- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Traffic cameras will be in school zones by the fall semester

Published: Mon, June 17, 2013 @ 7:45 p.m.

Traffic cameras will be in school zones by the fall semester

Youngstown council to discuss traffic cameras


About four years after it first was discussed, city council will consider an ordinance Wednesday to establish laws on traffic cameras.

The cameras, about 10 in all, will be installed in school areas this summer, and be up and running by the start of the fall semester, said Anthony Donofrio, the city’s deputy law director who worked with Police Chief Rod Foley on the cameras issue.

The ordinance doesn’t restrict traffic cameras from being used throughout the city, but Donofrio said city council members are committed to using them only in school zones.

“The ordinance is open if they want to expand it” in the future, “but they only want it in school zones,” he said.

The city first started talking about traffic cameras in school zones in 2009. In September 2012, three companies submitted proposals to install and monitor the cameras; city council decided in January to go with Redflex Traffic Systems of Phoenix.

Redflex will keep about 30 percent of the money collected from those caught speeding or other vehicular infractions in school zones, Donofrio said.

City officials say this isn’t a money grab, but an effort to keep speeds down in school zones.

The cameras will be used only when school is in session, Donofrio said.

The proposed traffic- camera law would require the city to initially put up signs in “conspicuous location[s]” informing motorists that the cameras are going there, the ordinance reads. Then, there would be a 30-day grace period in which warning letters would be sent to violators before the city started ticketing.

Those caught on camera would be charged with civil violations so it doesn’t impact their driver’s license or registration, Donofrio said.

When students come to and leave schools, the speed limit is 20 mph in school zones.

Those caught by the cameras driving about 10 mph over the limit likely will not be charged, but that’s up to the police department, Donofrio said.

The new law, if approved by council, calls for a $100 penalty for going up to 13 mph over the speed limit, $125 for those driving 14 to 19 mph over the limit, and $150 for those going 20 mph over the limit. Also, non-speed-based violations are $100.

There are late penalties, too. If a fine isn’t paid in 30 days, $20 is added. It goes to $40 60 days after getting a ticket, and to $60 if it’s unpaid after 90 days. The fine and penalty go to a collection agency after 90 days, and could impact people’s credit scores, Donofrio said.

The city likely will hire a retired officer to review the data and video produced by the traffic cameras to determine who will be cited under the new law, Donofrio said. Those who want to contest the fine would have appeals heard by a local attorney to be hired by the city for that responsibility, he said.


11970mach1(1005 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

Money grab.

Suggest removal:

2glbtactivist(304 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

City council should be ashamed of themselves. They are not charging anyone with a crime and giving them a day in court. Instead they are using speeders to make money. Council should be serving the public, not squeezing the public's wallets.

Suggest removal:

3NoBS(2509 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

It's all about the Almighty Dollar. Traffic cams do not affect safety one iota. All they do is generate revenue.

"The city likely will hire a retired officer to review the data and video produced by the traffic cameras to determine who will be cited under the new law, Donofrio said." Why does anyone have to "determine" who will be cited? If the camera clicks, it's a violation, right? If these things are so fool proof, why do we need someone to pick and choose who is cited?

Suggest removal:

4NilesOhio(926 comments)posted 2 years, 7 months ago

@NoBS - Because people have been challenging that the whole process is flawed since the accused cannot confront his/her accuser. They were also shifting these cases from traffic court to civil violations to circumvent that very problem. You, the average citizen, cannot challenge the courts in those cases.

The whole thing just wreaks of governmental abuse of power. And with many areas removing the cameras (or in Girard's case, having it removed for them and thrown off a bridge) I'm surprised that Youngstown is now going forward with this. Oh yeah, this is Youngstown - always late to the party and never fails to do the wrong thing for the community.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes