facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Why big-budget movies bombed this year



Published: Mon, July 22, 2013 @ 12:00 a.m.

By Rafer Guzman

Newsday (MCT)

The return of Arnold Schwarzenegger! A teen romance from the creator of “Twilight”! Will and Jaden Smith in a massive sci-fi spectacle! As movie concepts go, these must have sounded like surefire ways to start printing money.

So ... what happened?

The year is only half over, and already we’ve seen a string of major duds. “Gangster Squad,” a costume drama starring Sean Penn and Emma Stone, had an almost Oscar-like glow but wound up freezing in January. Jennifer Lopez and Jason Statham courted the action/romance crowd with “Parker,” but shot themselves in the foot. And while we were still marveling at the implosion of “After Earth,” along came the belly-flop of “The Lone Ranger.”

Who or what is to blame for these major letdowns? We asked a handful of movie-industry observers to help us do a postmortem on a few of this year’s most high-profile duds. The recurring problems were unoriginal stories and underwhelming stars, but the larger issue seems to be a combination of increasingly inflated production budgets and a mercilessly crowded marketplace.

“Movies are having a hard time holding,” says Todd Cunningham, news editor at TheWrap.com. “There’s just blockbuster after blockbuster. If you don’t connect with your audience on your first go-round, you’re not going to.”

“The Last Stand” (Jan. 18)

The pitch: Schwarzenegger tackles his first starring role in a decade as a small-town sheriff battling an international drug lord.

What happened: Despite a sizable fan base for “The Expendables” movies, audiences barely noticed this dead-of-winter release.

Who’s hurting: All vintage action stars, says Phil Contrino, chief analyst at BoxOffice.com. “What they’re finding out is that they can’t transition from doing a franchise movie and then doing an original movie.”

Bottom line: $37.1 million (all are recent worldwide figures according to reporting service BoxOfficeMojo.com)

“Parker” (Jan. 25)

The pitch: Jason Statham and Jennifer Lopez team up as a thief and a real- estate agent in this action romcom.

What happened: Statham’s violent antihero and Lopez’s bubbly office girl made for a weirdly noxious mix.

Who’s hurting: Statham. “He’s always stuck in this range of between $10-$15-million openings,” says Contrino, “and ‘Parker’ did less than that.”

Bottom line: $17.6 million

“Beautiful Creatures” (Feb. 14)

The pitch: In a small Southern town, an average teenage boy falls for the witchy new girl in school.

What happened: This adaptation didn’t come with the built-in fan base of “Twilight” or “The Hunger Games,” says Andrew Stewart, box-office reporter at Variety.

Who’s hurting: Other young-adult franchises with less than rabid followings.

Bottom line: $60 million

“Jack the Giant Slayer” (March 1)

The pitch: The old fairy tale gets the “Lord of the Rings” treatment with an action-fantasy vibe and elaborate CGI.

What happened: It wasn’t an ultraviolent twist or a pure kids movie, and “Jack” never found its audience. An A-list lead actor might have helped.

Who’s hurting: Budgeted at $195 million, “Jack” has made some money. But it’s a slight ding for director Bryan Singer.

Bottom line: $197 million

’The Incredible Burt Wonderstone“ (March 15)

The pitch: Steve Carell and Steve Buscemi don campy costumes and kooky wigs as old-school Las Vegas magicians, while Jim Carrey plays their crazed nemesis.

What happened: “Competition, crummy marketing, bad reviews — you could check a couple of boxes,” says Cunningham. “And none of this addresses the idea that it was a really bad movie.”

Who’s hurting: Carrey, especially given the pre-release damage he’s done to his upcoming film “Kick-Ass 2” by publicly disavowing it.

Bottom line: $22.5 mil-lion

“The Host” (March 29)

The pitch: While battling an alien invasion, one human girl (Saoirse Ronan) must choose between two suitors (Max Irons and Jake Abel). Based on a novel by “Twilight” sensation Stephenie Meyer.

What happened: A serious case of supernatural-teen-love-triangle fatigue.

Who’s hurting: “Stephenie Meyer is not Stephen King,” says Contrino.

Bottom line: $48 million

“After Earth” (May 31)

The pitch: Box-office megastar Will Smith plays father to real-life son Jaden in a sci-fi adventure set on an abandoned Earth.

What happened: Produced by Will Smith and based on his story idea, “After Earth” ended up looking like a vanity project for Jaden, who proved unable to carry a $130-million movie. Whiffs of Scientology — Will has been a donor, and the movie features a possibly Hubbardian volcano — didn’t help.

Who’s hurting: Director M. Night Shyamalan (“The Last Airbender”), whose name is becoming synonymous with “bomb.”

Bottom line: $199 million, but only $59 million in the United States.


Don't Miss a Story

Sign up for our newsletter to receive daily news directly in your inbox.

News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Services
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes