- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Will right to work haunt gov?

Published: Sun, January 6, 2013 @ 12:00 a.m.

By Bertram de Souza (Contact)

With two years in office under his belt and his re-election bid on the horizon, Republican Gov. John Kasich has embraced the adage, “Once bitten, twice shy.”

But, while he runs from an issue that could well be his undoing in the 2014 gubernatorial election, he may not be able to hide from it.

Right to work, which was all the rage in early 2011 in Columbus as the new governor settled in, isn’t even being whispered by Kasich.

However, his refusal to even mention the subject during his end-of-year interviews with reporters last month doesn’t mean it’s dead.

The tea party movement appears more interested in making Ohio the 25th state to adopt a right-to-work law — Michigan became the 24th last year — than in Kasich’s re-election.

That’s why tea party adherents continue to circulate petitions to get the issue on the ballot this year, even though the governor is trying mightily to avoid even mentioning the three words: right to work.

Consider his answer to a question on whether he would support the effort by proponents to place the issue on this November’s ballot:

“When you have a focus, you have to focus on your agenda. That’s what I’m focused on. Think of me as a horse trying to run to the finish line with blinders on. I’m not looking at any horse next to me. If I just do this, Ohio is going to be in much better shape, and focus is an awful lot about what this job is about.”

Time bomb

Reading between the lines, Kasich understands that the issue is a ticking time bomb.

It’s worth noting that during his run for governor in 2010 against incumbent Ted Strickland, a Democrat seeking a second four-year term, Kasich talked about the advantages of making Ohio a right-to-work state during a campaign stop in Toledo.

Thus, the chatter in Columbus shortly after he was sworn in that it would be one of the items on his agenda. Indeed, it was coupled with the reform of Ohio’s collective bargaining law that the governor and the Republican majority in the General Assembly were determined to pursue.

Kasich and his GOP colleagues are still licking their wounds from the battle over State Issue 2 (Senate Bill 5) that was on the November 2011 general election ballot.

After majority Republicans in the House and Senate rammed through legislation that took away many collective bargaining rights public employee unions have enjoyed for more than two decades, public and private sector unions, along with the Ohio Democratic Party, decided to go for broke and put the issue up for a vote of the people.

With more than 1 million voters signing referendum petitions, it became clear that the Republicans had woken a sleeping giant. Union workers and a goodly number of Democrats either stayed home in 2010 or voted for Kasich, resulting in Strickland’s losing by a very narrow margin.

It was suggested that hard core Democrats were unhappy with Democratic President Obama and his signature legislative initiative, health insurance reform (Obamacare).

But, with Republicans attempting to gut the public employee unions through collective bargaining reform, the old political alliances came together and put a hurting on Kasich and his GOP allies in the Legislature.

The wounds still haven’t healed, which is why the governor won’t even let the words “right to work” cross his lips.

If the tea partiers aren’t successful in placing the issue on this November’s ballot, they will certainly do so in 2014.

And that’s the last thing Kasich needs — another fight with an energized labor movement.

As one veteran pol in Columbus put it, “The tea party isn’t committed to Kasich, so the proponents of right to work aren’t concerned about his political future.”

Wide support?

Why push such a politically divisive issue? Because proponents believe that Ohioans, like their neighbors in Michigan, would support a ban on mandatory union membership and dues payments.

Kasich can run from the issue, but he won’t be able to hide from it if it’s on the ballot.

Note: For a discussion of the arguments for and against right-to-work laws, see Friday’s Vindicator, page A11.


1NoBS(2845 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

Kasich as a lame duck will have the fortitude to address the issue of RTW. Kasich the candidate for reelection is hiding from it.

People who don't like unions are free to move somewhere where they don't have any. And please have the integrity to give back the things unions got for you - the 40 hour workweek, laws governing overtime, job safety, and so on.

Suggest removal:

2samIam(242 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

Right to work for less, yes that's the bandwagon to jump on !?
Let's see now whom does it help? The masta's plantation owner that's whom it surely benefits doesn't it?
The middle class will suffer under the Wal Mart mentality of "more and more for Da owner and less and less for the grunts"

Suggest removal:

3redeye1(5683 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

I just read an article in a different newspaper that states that the RTW states are doing much better then union held states . The wages are comparative if not better , the working conditions are the same. So if we do get to vote on a RTW bill I will be voting YES

Suggest removal:

4fd6636(289 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

Nacho, and all the other right to work supporters, remember this: If right to work comes to Ohio, do you think the work place will become better??? Do you really think that if they curtail unions and their say at the "table" that things will be "better" for the non union workers?? Do you really think that it will make things as you say out there more fair??? NO!! Do you think you will have the chance for better wages under rtw rules?? I see it like this: You dont wanna pay for the wages/ benefits that the unions have fought for, then get YOUR OWN RIGHT TO WORK WAGES which will be lower Im sure! Your not gonna ride my back for free! (Isn't this the tea baggers battle cry!!!) how ironic, isn't it?
the rights of the employee will be less and the abusive power of the employer, I.E. "Bossman" will be greater. Dont think so? Ask employees of a right to work state about that. I have family who worked down south and HATED IT!!! Fact: Right to work means more work for less money which does nothing for the ecomony. Came back and got a better paying job, and yep, it was non-union!! Go figure that: A better, non union job in a union state!! This is what im tellin you,Job quality,pay scales, and work conditions will suffer like they do in rtw states. You get what you ask for!!!You think that its all good? Move. wait till it affects you! Bottom line. the domino effect. If it gets bad for union workers, and their jobs, they will more than abuse the non union workers even more than they already do im sure! why? Because they now would have the tools to do so. Food for thought.

Suggest removal:

51loaf(100 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

Since the booming economy and wonderful quality of life is the valley make the Valley a paradise to live in the state will have to exempt the Mahoning Valley from any laws which make life better for the middle class. Shouldn't be too hard since this area has long felt the folks deserve cradle to grave support without being bothered by working for it!

Suggest removal:

6mim1237(7 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

My niece lives in a RTW state. Never took a day off sick and never late for work. Got hurt outside of work and when she took her doctors slip in stating she needed a leave they fired her on the spot. No questions asked and no explanations. Right to work my..., well its right to screw over anyone an employer wants. Just because some people work for decent companies doesn't mean everyone does and with limited employment opportunities its not so easy to just go find another job. So do not try to tell me that RTW will not allow companies to treat workers like second class citizens and take advantage of people. Oh and by the way she was told by legal counsel that they can get away with firing her because she had no protection for an injury received outside of work.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes