facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Replace the farcical filibuster with one that requires effort



Published: Wed, January 2, 2013 @ 12:00 a.m.

There are any number of reasons why the 112th Congress will be remembered as one of the least productive in history. And both parties will share some of the blame for that, although each will argue that it was the other’s fault. That very tendency — to look for someone to blame rather than look for a solution — says a lot about the state of inertia in our nation’s capital.

And while there are those who will argue otherwise, we would suggest that one of the most productive things that Senate Democrats could do to get things moving in the 113th Congress is to change the Senate rules to restore the filibuster. Not the filibuster that we know today — a virtually painless shadow of the filibuster of yesteryear — but a real filibuster that would require a senator who wanted to block legislation he or she considered deleterious to stand on the Senate floor and inveigh against it for as long as voice and bladder would allow.

That was a filibuster that deserved to be honored with the 60 votes necessary to end debate. Today, all it takes is one senator to threaten a filibuster and virtually any piece of business before the Senate requires not a simple majority but a supermajority to pass.

Some Republicans say that if the Democrats change the filibuster rules for the 113th Congress to make a filibuster more difficult (and more meaningful) that they will use other tactics at their disposal to shut the Senate down. Perhaps they would, but at least then their intransigence would be transparent — and open to a response by America’s public.

And there are some Democrats who are reluctant to dilute the filibuster because they are mindful that majorities come and majorities go, and that they will someday be in the minority. Well, unless there is a sea change in the partisan rancor that has its grip on Washington, we’re going to suggest that if the Republicans had taken control of the Senate in the upcoming Congress — as they were once expected to do — they’d have changed the rules of the filibuster before any Democrat had a chance to utter “cloture.”

Initiatives blocked

The Republican minority has used the filibuster to block a jobs bill, a farm bill, a highway bill, the Disclosure Act, the Dream Act and dozens of other Democratic initiatives. They perfected the tactic, and anyone who thinks that they would have handed that weapon intact to minority Democrats so that they could hamstring a Republican majority would have to be dreaming.

Two years ago, Democrats flirted with the idea of filibuster reform. We liked a proposal by Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Oregon, that would have required that once a filibuster had started, five filibustering senators would have to be present for the first 24 hours; 10 during the next 24 hours and 20 after that. Meanwhile, there would have to be an ongoing debate, the kind of debate that informs the public about what is at stake.

But Democratic leaders were too timid for that or for any meaningful filibuster reform.

They trusted that their Republican colleagues would show more respect for governance than politics. What they got was a party so wedded to filibustering that last month Minority Leader Mitch McConnell introduced a bill that he was sure could not pass, and when it became obvious that it would pass, he filibustered his own bill.

There is an often mangled piece of folk wisdom: Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

The Democrats have been fooled into preserving the phony filibuster long enough. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid should make returning the filibuster to its historic roots his first order of business in the 113th Congress.


Comments

1chuck_carney(499 comments)posted 1 year, 9 months ago

Changing the filibuster rules will not get Sen Harry Reid to vote on the House bills sent over. The fiscal cliff issue could have been avoided if Reid put the bills up for a vote; rather the proposed legislation just sat there since the summer

The Democrat Senate is nothing but a body of inertia.

Suggest removal:

2NoBS(1963 comments)posted 1 year, 9 months ago

Open your eyes, Chuck - BOTH parties are nothing but inertia embodied. Which party has said publicly that it's main business will be to make sure nothing the President wants gets passed?

Congress - on both sides of the aisle, is broken.

Suggest removal:

3redeye1(4564 comments)posted 1 year, 9 months ago

Let's FIRE them all , Everyone has his or her own agenda. They could careless about the country. They are only going to work on things that make them look good..

Suggest removal:

476Ytown(1254 comments)posted 1 year, 9 months ago

And the Senate will go down in history as voting on the 154 page fiscal cliff bill within 3 minutes of receiving it. They never even read it! And who can forget when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of controversy.” And they passed Obamacare.

The Fiscal Cliff Bill includes several provisions that are unrelated to the fiscal cliff, including repealing a section of ObamaCare, extending the wind-energy tax credit,
$430 million for Hollywood through “special expensing rules” to encourage TV and film production in the United States. Producers can expense up to $15 million of costs for their projects.
$331 million for railroads by allowing short-line and regional operators to claim a tax credit up to 50 percent of the cost to maintain tracks that they own or lease.
$222 million for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands through returned excise taxes collected by the federal government on rum produced in the islands and imported to the mainland.
$70 million for NASCAR by extending a “7-year cost recovery period for certain motorsports racing track facilities.”
$59 million for algae growers through tax credits to encourage production of “cellulosic biofuel” at up to $1.01 per gallon.
$4 million for electric motorcycle makers by expanding an existing green-energy tax credit for buyers of plug-in vehicles to include electric motorbikes.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport