facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Home-school advocates wrong in undermining ‘Teddy’s Law’



Published: Sun, December 22, 2013 @ 12:00 a.m.

State Sen. Capri S. Cafaro walked into a buzz saw last week when she proposed what she obviously thought was a common sense bill designed to offer children the greatest level of protection against abuse during their school years.

Cafaro, D-Hubbard, called Senate Bill 248 “Teddy’s Law” as a tribute to and reminder of Teddy Foltz, the 14-year-old Struthers boy who died in January after enduring months of abuse at the hands of his mother’s boyfriend, Zaryl Bush.

Teddy’s death raised significant questions about how the level of abuse the boy was receiving continued, especially after it was learned that teachers in Hubbard and Struthers schools had reported suspected abuse. His mother, Shain Widdersheim, pulled him from Struthers schools when questions of abuse were raised, saying she was going to home school him.

Cafaro made the tactical error of trying to close that loophole in her legislation and opened a firestorm of opposition from home-school advocates. Under that pressure, an apparently chastened Cafaro announced Thursday that she was withdrawing the bill. Her new bill, she said, would be more comprehensive, but would in no way address the question of home schooling.

Unfortunate reaction

The kneejerk reaction to Cafaro’s bill was unfortunate. While there is no question that the vast majority of home-school parents are conscientious in providing their children the education that they believe is best for them, Teddy Foltz’s mother used home schooling as a ruse that ultimately resulted in the death of a child.

As a practical matter, however, Cafaro did what was necessary because the present leadership in the General Assembly would not have given consideration to any bill that attracted the ire of home school forces or the opposition of e-school companies.

Whatever course Cafaro follows in pursuing a new Teddy’s Law, it remains that a boy suffered and died, even as some adults around him suspected the worst. In February, we suggested the case called for an unusual response, a full and open coroner’s inquest that would have allowed the subpoenaing of school and social service workers, leading to reconstruction of events leading up to his death.

Such an inquiry may have answered the question of how the social network failed Teddy. Cafaro is now calling for field hearings before crafting a bill to protect vulnerable children. The hearing in Mahoning County should focus on a textbook example of failure, the death of Teddy Foltz.


Comments

1birdseed(66 comments)posted 8 months, 4 weeks ago

the liberals will use any crisis to advance their agenda, which is total control of education. this is the real reason they oppose home schooling.

Suggest removal:

2concerned(173 comments)posted 8 months, 4 weeks ago

Teddy was enrolled in an e-school and almost all of which are in fact public schools (charter/community schools) which declare that the student is in fact not homeschooled, but an enrolled student in a government funded school for which NO notification needs to be filed and no compliance written for excusal, making the law contradict other laws in place. In fact, by the definition of the law, Teddy was never homeschooled. He was enrolled in an e-school. One virtual school defines it this way: http://www.k12.com/facts-about-k12-public-virtual-schools....

Any action taken in reaction to Teddy's abuse and death should look at the failures of the Child Protective Services system. They dropped the ball here. Teachers did report their concerns about Teddy's possible abuse. So, what happened?

Sen Cafaro is correct in withdrawing this bill.

You are incorrect in blaming the home school community for undermining her efforts. The home school community would support any efforts that actually target the responsible organizations actions, or lack of them.

Suggest removal:

3shuttlebus(5 comments)posted 8 months, 4 weeks ago

After reading this article, I have to wonder if this "reporter" even bothered to read the bill. There was absolutely nothing in this bill that would have prevented Teddy's death. The abuse had been going on for years and had been reported to CPS on multiple occasions. Rather than blaming homeschooling for this tragic death, our elected officials should be launching a full scale investigation into determining why CPS didn't do its job. The General Assembly would not have supported this bill because it violated homeschoolers' 4th Amendment rights.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport