- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Support mounts for strike on Syria

Published: Wed, August 28, 2013 @ 12:00 a.m.

Secretary of defense: US forces stand ready

Associated Press


Momentum appeared to build for Western military action against Syria, with the U.S. and France saying they are in position for a strike, while the government in Damascus vowed to use all possible measures to repel it.

The prospect of a dramatic U.S.-led intervention into Syria’s civil war stemmed from the West’s assertion — still not endorsed by U.N. inspectors — that President Bashar Assad’s government was responsible for an alleged chemical attack on civilians outside Damascus on Aug. 21 that the group Doctors Without Borders says killed 355 people. Assad denies it.

The Arab League also threw its weight behind calls for punitive action, blaming the Syrian government for the attack and calling for those responsible to be brought to justice.

British Prime Minister David Cameron recalled Parliament for an emergency vote Thursday on his country’s response. It is unlikely that any international military action would begin before then.

U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said U.S. military forces stand ready to strike Syria at once if President Barack Obama gives the order, and French President Francois Hollande said France was “ready to punish those who took the heinous decision to gas innocents.”

Obama is weighing a response focused narrowly on punishing Assad for violating international agreements that ban the use of chemical weapons. Officials said the goal was not to drive Assad from power or impact the broader trajectory of Syria’s bloody civil war, now in its third year.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Monday the West should be under no illusion that bombing Syrian military targets would help end the violence in Syria, an ally of Moscow, and he pointed to the volatile situations in Iraq and Libya that he said resulted from foreign military intervention.

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said his country would use “all means available” to defend itself.

“We have the means to defend ourselves and we will surprise everyone,” he said.

At a news conference in Damascus, al-Moallem challenged Washington to present proof to back up its accusations and he also likened the allegations to false American charges in 2003 that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction before the U.S.-led invasion of that country.

“They have a history of lies — Iraq,” he said.

Vice President Joe Biden said there was no question that Assad was responsible for the attack — the highest-ranking U.S. official to say so — and the White House dismissed as “fanciful” the notion that anyone other than Assad could be to blame.

“Suggestions that there’s any doubt about who’s responsible for this are as preposterous as a suggestion that the attack did not occur,” spokesman Jay Carney said.

A U.S. official said some of the evidence includes signals intelligence — information gathered from intercepted communications. The U.S. assessment is also based on the number of reported victims, the symptoms of those injured or killed, and witness accounts. The officials insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the internal deliberations.


1TonyRizzo(82 comments)posted 1 year ago

"Those Who Do Not Know or Learn From History, Are DOOMED to repeat It's Failures and Mistakes AGAIN!"

Has not the US learned from the cancer in the Middle East (muslims) that there is nothing good getting involved with these people who do not value Life or property?
This is a civil war where muslim is killing muslim.
These people condem the US and bring death and destruction on the US and it's allies, and now these evil people want our help?

Where is the outcry from Al Quiada?
Where is the outcry from Hamas?
Where is the outcry from Iran?
Where is the outcry fron the Taliban?
Where is the outcry from Checnyia?
Where is the outcry from the muslim brotherhood in other countries?

A.) In the 1950s the Korean conflict, no solution or end, still stuck there today dealing with that conflict!

B.) In the 1960s the Vietman War, no solution and major costly defeat in lives and resourses!

C.) In the 1970s the US supported the Shaw of Iran, and that bit us in the Rear!

D.) In the 1980s the US supported Iraq and Sadam Hussein against Iran, and that bit us in the Rear!

E.) In the 1990's the US supported the Mushahadeen in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union, then they turned around and and bit the US in the "ARSE"!
How did all of these conflicts work out for the United States????
Terrible, Deadly and Very Very costly to families, lives and money.

Stay the hell out of the Middle East and those crazy muslims. Let them kill each other if that's their peaceful religion.

Who is going to pay financially for these bombs ships military black opps intell in there?
The republicans won't even give the needy an asprin for SS or Medicare and yet we will bomb?
The republicans are rigging the elections with voter restriction laws at the state level, yet they cry cut cut cut?
Hypocrites!!!! All of them.

$11 Trillion Dollars debt because of 2 wars by the republican congress and republican president (Bush), plus $13-15 billion dollars a year for VA benefits they heroicaly and rightfuly earned, those Brave Solders and their wonderful families who suffered lost of life and or limb for a whole generation (30-40 years)?

Stay away or the US will suffer AGAIN the same results they did for the last 60 years!

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport