- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
ad will close in 5

« News Home

Court orders new trial for man convicted of murdering baby

Published: Mon, August 26, 2013 @ 7:12 p.m.

Appeals court: Defendant’s right to open trial violated

Court orders new trial for man convicted of murdering baby

Man to get new trial in ’03 killing of East Side infant


The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati has ordered a new trial for a man sentenced to death for killing a baby in 2003 in the Lincoln Knolls area of the East Side.

The court ruled 2-1 in an opinion released Monday that John Drummond, 36, who also is on trial in Ashtabula County Common Pleas Court for a 1997 murder, was denied a fair trial in February 2004 because former Judge Maureen Cronin of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas closed the courtroom for part of the trial.

That violated Drummond’s Sixth Amendment rights under the Constitution to have an open trial, the circuit court said.

Drummond was convicted by a jury and sentenced to death for the murder of Jiyen Dent, 3, who was killed inside the Rutledge Drive home of his parents March 24, 2003, as they were unpacking boxes because they had recently moved there. The baby was hit with an AK-47 round in the head while he was in a swing and killed instantly.

Prosecutors at trial said Drummond, a member of an East Side gang, thought the baby’s father was responsible for the death of one of his friends in 1998.

At two points during the trial, Judge Cronin closed the courtroom because she said some of the jurors and witnesses felt threatened by some of the spectators in the courtroom.

Media members were allowed in to watch and record the proceedings, but the courtroom was cleared of all spectators, including family members. At the time, Drummond’s lawyer, James Gentile, objected, saying that Drummond was entitled to a public trial under the Constitution.


1mnascar(38 comments)posted 2 years, 8 months ago

What a joke the justice system is getting to be. How about protecting witnesses from gang retalitations. We the taxpayers have to pay for a new trial. Is his attorney being paid by the State of Ohio too?

Suggest removal:

2walter_sobchak(2587 comments)posted 2 years, 8 months ago

So, now, 9 1/2 years AFTER the original trial, this POS gets a new trial. Good luck trying to have justice served now since witnesses die (or are murdered), memories begin to fail, evidence gets lost or misplaced. What about justice for the 3 year old that was shot in the head? How does closing the courtroom for part of the trial not get the defendant a reasonably fair trial? This was put in the Constitution to avoid kangaroo courts not to allow pieces of human trash to game the system!

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes