vindyJobsvindyWheels

Youngstown school board rejects funding members' trip to Calif.

Published: 4/10/13 @ 12:10


By Denise Dick

denise_dick@vindy.com

Youngstown

If three city school board members want to attend a National School Boards Association conference this weekend in San Diego, they’ll have to pay for it themselves.

The school board on Tuesday rejected, by a 3-3 vote, spending about $4,113 for President Richard Atkinson and members Marcia Haire-Ellis and Brenda Kimble to attend the annual conference, which runs Saturday through Monday.

Atkinson, Haire-Ellis and Kimble voted in favor of the resolution with members Andrea Mahone, Rachel Hanni and Michael Murphy opposed. Without a majority vote, the resolution failed.

Lock P. Beachum Sr. didn’t attend Tuesday’s school board meeting. He’s in San Diego for the conference, but his attendance didn’t involve the expenditure of district funds.

Last month, the school board passed a resolution to spend about $12,000 for Beachum, Atkinson, Haire-Ellis, Kimble and Murphy to go to the conference.

Neither Mahone nor Hanni had planned to attend. Atkinson and Haire-Ellis planned to pay their own airfare.

But the district’s fiscal monitor, appointed by the Youngstown Schools Academic Distress Commission, rejected the earlier resolution.

Last December, the academic commission took over budget authority because of a projected district deficit. The commission, through the fiscal monitor, must approve all expenditures exceeding $5,000 and all contracts.

Tuesday’s resolution didn’t meet the $5,000 threshold. The three members planned to pay their own respective airfares and some other costs with Haire-Ellis and Kimble planning to share a room.

In other business, the board appointed James A. Reinhard, who has been the commission-appointed fiscal monitor since last December, as part-time treasurer.

Reinhard, who is the retired treasurer of Canton City Schools, will earn $60 per hour, not to exceed $70,000 annually.

His contract runs Monday through July 31, 2014.

The district has been without a permanent treasurer since May 2012.


Comments


Posted by RTS1416 (anonymous) on April 10, 2013 at 9:35 a.m.

58,000 for a master plumber is not at all out of line, in most parts of the country that would be a bargain. A quality skilled tradesman is difficult to find.


Posted by busyman (anonymous) on April 10, 2013 at 10:27 a.m.

You do not like this guy based on your apprasial of his performance and nowyou would consider rehiring him on a contract basis.


Posted by TERRAPINST (anonymous) on April 10, 2013 at 11:44 a.m.

My problem with this article isn't the salary of the Treasurer position it's the fact that not one but 4 Board members wanted to attend a conference for 12 GRAND- Seriously? Once again, the public officials need to take a lesson from private industry. it is important to stay in touch with professional development. Who knows, this could be the one where they instruct Bd. members how to oh ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING!! Therefore, send one Board Member and have them return and instruct the others in an in-service training as to what was shared. The idea of having multiple Board Members attend the same conference amounts to nothing more than Spring Break for our elected officials. Get your State required training hours at online COST EFFECTIVE sessions.


Posted by walter_sobchak (anonymous) on April 10, 2013 at 12:10 p.m.

$58,000 for a master plumber is about right. This is not an apprentice! It is a skilled trade. Maybe the teachers should take the time to instruct the students what a teacher makes to start, what a plumber can make, and let them see the benefits of obtaining a skill, either using their hands or their heads. Why is it that we demean those that do physical labor? Why do some think just because a person gets a four-year college degree they deserve some huge paycheck? Just like the clueless on in the White House that believes every kid should go to college. No they should not.


Posted by Cicero (anonymous) on April 10, 2013 at 12:50 p.m.

The real shame here is that the three voting for the proposal attempted to get under the $ 5K radar, after the Commission (properly) noted that the expenditure - at any level - was inappropriate.

$58K is not out of line for a master plumber, nor is $ 60 /hr. inappropriate for a qualified Treasurer. These are not the real issues in this story.


Posted by TERRAPINST (anonymous) on April 10, 2013 at 1:49 p.m.

The above post lead me to think about the following. I know I know if you say something abut teachers or their guerilla warfare unions you hate children and don't care about the future or the country and don't appreciate being able to read I know ... I know. The following was given to me by my Republican teacher brother who has been in the system for 32 years and says its very accurate. I know, he must not be one of the dedicated protectors of our youth that all teachers claim to be BUT food for thought. Simply don't work near regular full time employees.
The average American worker:
52 weeks x 5 Days/week = 260 Days
4 weeks vacation/year = -16 Days*
10 holidays/year= -10
3 sick days/year= -3
3 personal days/year= -3
Total days worked 228 Days/ year
* 4 weeks vacation AFTER 4-5 years of employment
Work day is 8 hours WORK with 1/2 hr. unpaid lunch and 2/15 minutes break/day

The average teacher:
School year = 180 days
14 Holidays/year= -14
5 personal days/year= -5
7 Sick days/year- -7
? Vacation days/year= ? *
Total days worked 154 Days/ year
*I have heard rumors teachers get vacation time as well but not confirmed
Work day is 7 hours including a 1/2 hour PAID lunch and one hour FREE period/day

Now I know all the teachers are going to cry about ALL the EXTRA time they put in at home and the "continuing" education they have to do.
Here is the solution: Work an 8 hour day with an unpaid lunch like the rest of us and you can get it all done in school! What a novel concept, huh?