- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

No longer undecided: 2 Valley voters at odds in choice for president

Published: Fri, September 28, 2012 @ 12:09 a.m.

By Doug Livingston


Kate DeMay and Jodie Jacobson were undecided voters just two weeks ago.

But after joining more than 3 million people who have viewed the same Youtube video, each woman is now decidedly voting for a candidate — just not the same one.

DeMay, 21, will vote Democratic on Nov. 6, and Jacobson, 43, will throw her support behind the Republican Party.

The women are among a growing number of formerly undecided voters.

As the weeks wind down to the presidential election, undecided voters from Northeast Ohio align themselves with a candidate, while others remain hesitant.

TheNewsOutlet is following eight such voters, some previously undecided and others yet undecided. This is the second installment in a series that aims to reflect these voters’ opinions and the events that influence those opinions. TheNewsOutlet will periodically follow up with these voters leading up to the presidential election.

Undecided voters’ opinions change as the campaigns heat up and private videos surface, such as the Mother Jones video, which surreptitiously recorded Mitt Romney at a fundraiser dinner.

The video portrayed Romney ostracizing 47 percent of Americans who receive government assistance.

It affirmed DeMay’s impression of Romney and everything that Jacobson has avoided talking about for the past three months.

“I appreciate the fact that he said that,” Jacobson said. “If you need help, that’s one thing, but if that’s your lifelong income, I don’t think it’s right.”

But DeMay, who attends Kent State University and grew up in Poland, doesn’t pay income taxes because the full-time student has no income. She was offended by Romney’s comment that those on government assistance think of themselves as victims.

“By calling me a victim you’ve pretty much just solidified that I’m not going to be voting for you,” DeMay said.

Both women said they were undecided in early September.

When DeMay filled out her new voter registration form two weeks ago, she said she would be keeping a close eye on both presidential candidates.

She wasn’t ready to commit to a party; she could barely commit to a pair of shoes, she said.

Around the same time, Jacobson was wrapping up the last day of the season at her parents’ produce stand along Belmont Avenue in Trumbull County.

Jacobson avoided political conversations that might reveal her true beliefs and potentially offend customers.

But early on, Jacobson expressed the burden that government subsidies placed on providing for her family, and DeMay said she didn’t trust Romney.

And with other self-proclaimed undecided voters expressing partisan concerns, some experts question the claim of being an undecided voter.

“Oftentimes people who are leaning really are going to vote for the person for whom they’re leaning,” said Leonard Steinhorn, a professor of political communication at American University in Washington, D.C. “They’ll find evidence that will confirm how they’re leaning.”

Steinhorn was a political speech writer for 15 years. If he were working for the Republican Party on this presidential campaign, he said he would have advised Romney to not apologize for his remarks and remind the country that the jobless rate at 8.1 percent is the only percentage that matters.

His message may have worked for some such as Columbiana County resident Dan Warner, who said the economy and jobs continue to be a concern.

Warner said comprehensive fiscal reform is necessary to save the nation’s stagnant economy. Another possible round of stimulus under Obama worries him.

So, now he, too, is leaning like other undecided voters before him.

“I do believe [Romney’s] business background and his past leadership experience give him a better shot at making the tough decisions necessary to fix what’s wrong in our nation, fiscally,” Warner, 30, said.

While most undecided or formerly undecided voters mentioned Romney’s comments about 47 percent of Americans, some are giving less weight to the video.

Joe Sullivan has voted for both major political parties in the past.

Sullivan, a 60-year-old Boardman resident, said that while Romney’s remarks were a “stupid thing to say, ... if you depend on the government to take care of you, you will be sorely disappointed.”

Real Clear Politics, which aggregates national polls, shows Obama leading Romney by 4.1 points in Ohio as of Monday.

The average polling statistics, charting each campaign’s ups and downs like a heartbeat monitor, show Romney’s vital signs as relatively unscathed by the video.

Before the video’s release, Romney commanded 44.3 percent of the Ohio vote, according to Real Clear Politics. After the video was released, Romney lost a half a percentage point within a day but, as of Monday, has rebounded to 44.7 percent, higher than before the video first aired last Wednesday.

Steinhorn said the content of the video was damning for Romney’s campaign. But after his wife’s attempt to humanize the GOP candidate during the Republican National Convention, the video did something the Romney campaign has been trying to accomplish for some time.

“The Republicans keep saying, ‘We want the people to know the real Mitt Romney, the genuine Mitt Romney.’ Well, here was the real Mitt Romney,” Steinhorn said, “unvarnished, in a way that he didn’t plan it to be seen.”

But even Steinhorn, who called the video more than just a speed bump for the Romney campaign, said everything fades in time.

“It may not be top of mind forever, but it has certainly created a frame around [Romney],” Steinhorn said.

TheNewsOutlet of Youngstown State University is following eight such voters, some previously undecided and others yet undecided. This is the second installment in a series that aims to reflect these voters’ opinions and the events that influence those opinions. TheNewsOutlet will periodically follow up with these voters leading up to the presidential election.

Read full stories on the eight voters at thenewsoutlet.org


1NoBS(2697 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

What about the growing number of us who dislike both choices, and are more and more annoyed at the incessant yammering from both sides?

Each party has given us a candidate that it considers "electable." Not the best qualified for the job, just "electable.". But qualifications don't matter anyway, because the President can't accomplish much of what he wants to do anyway, between what he owes his party for getting him the job, and what he can get past Congress, who actually runs the country.

England has a ban on paid political advertising before a certain date. It's high time we did the same thing, here in the US.

Suggest removal:

2bunkpatrol(361 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

No Democrat or Republican will be a staunch supporter of campaign finance reform. It takes too much money to fend off misinformation and slanderous political ads. Both parties have too much to lose.

Think of it as two different puppets controlled by the same puppeteer; the established corporate dinosaurs have too much to lose to make real change.

It is high time to stop supporting "the lesser of two evils" and put your vote behind someone in whom you believe represents YOUR interests.

You may not get the glory of having voted for the "winner" this time. But your grandchildren may certainly benefit from your baby steps made in the right direction.

When fear is the motivator (ie, "vote for this guy because you don't want THAT guy to win") we all lose. There is no real choice until we support one.

Suggest removal:

3AtownAugie(873 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

One of the two women obviously loves America, and made the right choice.

Suggest removal:

4misterlee(118 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

Right Augie, anyone who has different ideals than you must hate America. Get real

Suggest removal:

5AtownAugie(873 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

@misterlee-- I didn't say which end of the spectrum was best. Temper, temper.

Suggest removal:

6LtMacGowan(708 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

Romney caught showing his true self on Camera didn't effect how I'm voting. I already knew this about him but let me be clear I'm voting for Obama again because I believe he s earned a second term, not because I'm voting against Romney.

Suggest removal:

7rickking123(330 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

Kind of funny that Mitt talks about the 47% and this Obama phone lady shows up to protest his campaign stop in Bedford Heights and basically proves his point.


Suggest removal:

8JoeFromHubbard(1742 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

Anyone who votes based upon Youtube video presentations is not well grounded in reality.

It is this mentality that elected Obama in the first place.

He campaigns among the inexperienced youth who will eventually pay for making the mistake of voting for him.

Suggest removal:

9borylie(946 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

The Obama's know they better get voters to the polls early, before the Libya cover up hits the fan. The killings of four Americans should have every American angry and the truth be known. Yet very little coverage of this terrible event. When Pres. Bush was president months and months of coverage of the Abu Ghraib event. No coverage of the 1998 tape with Obama saying he believes in income redistribution. Once some of this comes to light and after the debates,people will be wishing they didn't cast an early ballot for Obama.

Suggest removal:

10jojuggie(1668 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

LtMac, you don't state your reasons for voting for Obama.
There are no jobs, the economy is in a shambles, he put the coal industry in the dumper, I've posted videos where Obama says he is a Muslim, he just lied about the executions in Libya, he wants income distribution, he has added 50% to our National debt, he is the 1st president to have our US credit rating reduced etc etc, and you say he earned another 4 yrs.. Do you know where we will be in another 4 years? I don't think we will exist as AMERICA.

Suggest removal:

11ANTIYOUNGSTOWN(253 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

Voting because you know what you`re going to get means you get more of what you already got.

Wish we could more four years ahead. hopefully we`ll get better choices.

Suggest removal:

12jojuggie(1668 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

KKK Tea Party ?????? where did you get that from??????? See Below

By NBC News, msnbc.com staff and news services
Story updated 12:30 p.m. ET:

Oakland officials on Sunday were inspecting damage inside City Hall that was caused by about 50 Occupy protesters who broke in and smashed glass display cases, spray-painted graffiti, and burned the U.S. and California flags.

The break-in on Saturday was the culmination of a day of clashes between protesters and police. At least 300 people were arrested on charges ranging from vandalism and failure to disperse.


At least three officers and one protester were injured.

Mayor Jean Quan said Occupy protesters have caused an estimated $2 million in damages from vandalism since October. She said the cost to the city related to the Occupy Oakland protests is pegged at about $5 million.

Suggest removal:

13jojuggie(1668 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

This is one of the 47% that Mitt was talking about.

Dear Mr. President:
During my shift in the Emergency Room last night, I had the pleasure of evaluating a patient whose smile revealed an expensive shiny gold tooth, whose body was adorned with a wide assortment of elaborate and costly tattoos, who wore a very expensive brand of tennis shoes and who chatted on a new cellular telephone equipped with a popular R&B ring tone.

While glancing over her patient chart, I happened to notice that her payer status was listed as "Medicaid"!

During my examination of her, the patient informed me that she smokes more than one costly pack of cigarettes every day and somehow still has money to buy pretzels and beer.

And, you and our Congress expect me to pay for this woman's health care? I contend that our nation's "health care crisis" is not the result of a shortage of quality hospitals, doctors or nurses. Rather, it is the result of a "crisis of culture", a culture in which it is perfectly acceptable to spend money on luxuries and vices while refusing to take care of one's self or, heaven forbid, purchase health insurance. It is a culture based on the irresponsible credo that "I can do whatever I want to because someone else will always take care of me."

Once you fix this "culture crisis" that rewards irresponsibility and dependency, you'll be amazed at how quickly our nation's health care difficulties will disappear.



Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes