facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Court: Cafaro can’t have all records



Published: Sat, September 22, 2012 @ 12:08 a.m.

By Peter H. Milliken

milliken@vindy.com

YOUNGSTOWN

The Ohio Supreme Court has unanimously ruled a lawyer for the Cafaro interests in the dismissed Oakhill Renaissance Place criminal conspiracy case is entitled to only part of what he asked for in a public-records request.

The lawyer, John F. McCaffrey of Cleveland, made the request of Paul J. Gains, Mahoning County prosecutor.

Exactly two years after McCaffrey filed his mandamus lawsuit, the justices in Columbus ruled Thursday he is entitled to work-related entries on the calendars of Gains and his assistant prosecutors, Linette Stratford and Gina Bricker, between Nov. 1, 2008, and July 2010.

The top court said many of the items McCaffrey requested were exempt from disclosure or don’t exist.

“We think there’s some information there that might be enlightening about the prosecutors’ activity,” said Joe Bell, director of corporate communications for the Cafaro Co.

Bell added that company officials were glad McCaffrey could get some of the information he wanted but disappointed he couldn’t get it all.

McCaffrey represented Cafaro Co. affiliates, The Ohio Valley Mall Co. and The Marion Plaza Inc., in the Oakhill criminal case, which state special prosecutors dismissed in July 2011 because they were unable to obtain tapes from the FBI to be shared with the defense in a pretrial evidence exchange.

In the dismissed Oakhill criminal case, the Cafaro interests and two current and two former Mahoning County officials were charged with conspiring to impede the move of the county’s Department of Job and Family Services from rented quarters in OVM’s Garland Plaza on Youngs-town’s East Side to the county-owned Oakhill.

JFS made the move in July 2007.

The top court ruled the sealed records McCaffrey sought “have everything to do with the criminal cases and nothing to do with McCaffrey’s assertions of prosecutorial misconduct.”

Gains may keep the records sealed because they are trial-preparation records, which are exempt from disclosure in a criminal case that still could be re-filed, the justices ruled.

In court documents, Cafaro lawyers accused Gains and his staff of improperly serving as witnesses, advisers and investigators for the grand jury, which issued the 73-count indictment in July 2010.

Gains said in 2010 he gave McCaffrey more than 8,000 pages, including everything Gains believed was subject to disclosure under the state’s open- records law.


Comments

1chuck_carney(499 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

The Trib's Joe Gorman reported some important information that the Vindy overlooked:

"An opinion issued by the Ohio Supreme Court Thursday said Prosecutor Paul Gains had requested that a special prosecutor take the case before a grand jury to avoid the appearance of impropriety because "the investigation involved numerous public officials, including two current judges and one retired judge, who might be witnesses or potential targets." '

Who are the judges? Will the Feds refile this case?

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport