facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Welfare is needed



Published: Thu, September 20, 2012 @ 12:00 a.m.

By C. NICOLE MASON

McClatchy-Tribune

Mitt Romney’s latest attack on Americans who are “dependent” on the government is off the mark.

Today, despite tremendous need and massive employment, less than 1 percent of the population is getting cash assistance from the government. From 2007 until now, only an additional half million women and children have received cash assistance.

Still, Romney blames President Obama for making it easier for people to be on welfare.

Romney has the story wrong. With the exception of funds doled out to states to shore up budget deficits and to support middle-class families who suddenly found themselves in need during the most recession, there have been no significant policy changes or spending on welfare. In fact, since Obama took office, spending on welfare has been about the same as when George W. Bush was president.

So what’s this all about?

Seeds of resentment

It is about trying to drive a wedge between middle-class Americans who are working full time and everyone else. Romney is sowing the seeds of resentment. He wants half of the country to look down upon those who, in his mind, just can’t pull it together to become successful. And he wants us to believe that if we all just worked hard enough, we wouldn’t need a safety net.

But that is simply not the case. The Great Recession has taken a grave toll across the lower and the middle classes. With high unemployment and job scarcity, all kinds of families have had to tap into government-sponsored programs to make ends meet.

In 2011, for example, close to 46 million — or one in seven people — received food stamps, a marked increased from 2007 when only 26.3 million tapped into the program. And these are not just the “old” poor, but also the “new” poor who are now accessing programs and services because of long spells of unemployment.

We have to be honest about our economic reality. Now is not the time to do away with programs that are keeping millions of families afloat.

C. Nicole Mason is an Ascend Fellow at the Aspen Institute and a senior consultant with the New York Women’s Foundation. She wrote this for Progressive Media Project, a source of liberal commentary on domestic and international issues; it is affiliated with The Progressive magazine. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.


Comments

1ytownsteelman(616 comments)posted 1 year, 7 months ago

So which is it? Less than 1 percent or 1 in 7? This op-ed is contradictory.

Suggest removal:

2harleyb(1 comment)posted 1 year, 6 months ago

I made this account just to ask why anyone would write an article on the internet without using said collection of human knowledge to, say, fact check your statistics. 1%? It seems the Department of Commerce says there is roughly 15 million welfare recipients. I wasn't aware the U.S. had more people than China. I guess we can just add the population of India to our own if it is used to support your point of view. Also, "massive employment". Please increase your professionalism, articles like this just make republicans look like they actually know what they're talking about.

Listen before you speak, read before you write.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport