- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Romney: ‘Victims’ comment not elegantly stated

Published: Tue, September 18, 2012 @ 10:18 a.m.

Romney: ‘Victims’ comment not elegantly stated

COSTA MESA, Calif. (AP) — Republican Mitt Romney is trying to head off a new distraction for his campaign after a video surfaced showing him telling wealthy donors that 47 percent of all Americans “believe they are victims” entitled to help from the government.

Romney offered no apologies at a news conference Monday but conceded the comments were not “elegantly stated” and spoken “off the cuff.”

The Republican presidential nominee says the remarks showed a contrast between President Barack Obama’s “government-centered society” and his belief in a “free-market approach.”

Obama’s campaign is pouncing on the video and using it to encourage supporters to donate money to the president’s re-election effort.

The video comes as Romney advisers try to reassure party leaders and donors about the Republican’s ability to win the White House.


1greene(167 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

z123go, nice try. The NAACP, Sandra Fluke (sp?) et al, encourage the victim mentality 24/7. Biden spoke of putting, "y'all BACK in chains..." Z12go, what does this mean?

Suggest removal:

2MzVirgoLuv(157 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

No, Greene, nice try. If you knew anything and I mean anything at all, you'd know, all the ppl I know, whom voted for Obama in 08 and whom are voting for him this election ALL PAY INCOME TAX. And the NAACP, Sandra Fluke do NOT have a victim mentality. Sorry to burst your republican bubble. If you knew anything, you'd know that insurance companies cover Viagra and why...that's not an health issue! But they won't cover Birth Control pills, that are rarely used for Birth control, but for many women's health issues! You even saying that we play the victim let's me know you are part of that great Youngstown racist mentality. If you knew anything, you'd know that it's more Whites on government assistance than any other race. So, who has that entitled victim mentality? Here's some facts for you greene: 49% OF WELFARE RECIPIENTS ARE WHITE; 26% ARE BLACK; 20% ARE SPANISH AND 8% OTHER RACES. So my dear, whom exactly has that victim mentality again? If you knew anything, you'd know, at only a gross income of two working adults in my houselhold of only $35,000 a year we pay a combined income tax of over 60%. My husband is at 37% so far and I make slightly more than he does an hour and I'm at 42%. So you and that racist POS Romney can kiss my taxed arse! And back in chains was meant as in "the government will put you back in chains by voter suppression, by raising your taxes...you know, chaining you down financially. But someone with a small mind like yours, would like to think that way...but won't admit your guy is an extreme elitlist racist! and so are MOST of the g-no-p! Hey, don't get mad because the brother has not only up staged your guy in results, but also in intelligence, morality, compassion, action and even in the wife department. I hope your kids never leave home so they can show you what a real victim is!

Suggest removal:

3AtownAugie(697 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Not "elegantly stated?" The truth rarely is.

Suggest removal:

4JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

@ MzVirgoLuv :

> > a gross income .... in my houselhold of only $35,000 a year we pay a combined income tax of over 60%. < <

I strongly suggest that you immediately seek the advice of a competent CPA. You are paying far in excess of what income tax would normally be applied to that income level.

If your numbers are correct.

Suggest removal:

5DwightK(1256 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

I think it's clear now what Romney thinks of the middle class and the poor. There are plenty of people working their butts off and barely surviving. They need help, not a smug jerk who thinks they all have the victim mentality.

Suggest removal:

6walter_sobchak(1909 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

@ MzVirgoLuv :
Please see a CPA immediately! If you have a gross income of $35K and file a joint tax return since you are married, you can claim a standard decuction of $11,600 and personal exemptions of $7400, giving you an adjusted gross income of $16,000. The tax on this amount for married filing jointly is $1603!. This is an effective tax rate of 4.6%, nowhere close to 60%! Even if you added in payroll taxes for SS and Medicare, that is only another 7.65%, yielding an effective rate of 12.25%.

The truth of the matter is that 50% of Americans receive some type of govt assitance or check. The dependent class keeps getting bigger and the real USA keeps shrinking. Victim status...I'll agree with that!!!!!

Suggest removal:

7gdog4766(1495 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Hey you have to remember Kasich act like a jerk his whole campaign and got elected. He stated he didn't care about the middle class, didn't like unions, only cared about businesses and still was elected.

Suggest removal:

8JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Why all of the bashing of pro business people?

They are the ones who build companies that supply the jobs for which so many clamor.

Suggest removal:

9cambridge(3010 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

romney is the best thing that has happened to the Democratic party since palin.

Clinton 2016!

Suggest removal:

10JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

@ cambridge :

You must have been on the debate team, that reply was an excellent sleight of hand, so to speak.

Suggest removal:

11JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

@ z123go :

> >They don't build a company to make jobs, they start a company to fill a need and sell something. < <

This goes without saying, it's understood. You're correct, businesses are not created for the sake of "jobs." It is in filling a need that they create jobs and wealth.

Ironically, the business creators are so often vilified by the job seekers.

Suggest removal:

12DwightK(1256 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Joe, a little respect from the job creators to employees would go a long way in changing that opinion. We've seen what Romney says behind closed doors when the cameras are off. Why wouldn't people be disgusted with him?

Suggest removal:

1376Ytown(1241 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Democrats want to help people with a hand OUT, Republicans want to help people with a hand UP.

Some people see a glass as half full some as half empty. Same glass different perspective. Both truly believe they are correct. Positive/Negative.

What is more shameful, the fact that the American people are getting poorer requiring the help of the federal government in order to survive, or, is it more shameful to suggest that people are given hope that they can get a job, support themselves and their families, plan for their future, provide for their retirement? If you find it disgusting to be successful, you might have a victim mentality. If you find it offensive to hear the word entitlement maybe you have no clue as to where the money comes from. Ever hear the phrase "money doesn't grow on trees"?

The path we are on is about to bring everyone down. More dependency, Tax the rich. Fewer jobs. Even if the entire nation, rich, middle class, poor, were to give their entire wealth to offset the deficit it would still only amount to about $3 trillion toward our $16 trillion debt. For every dollar our government spends, 40 cents is borrowed from countries like China. This is short term debt borrowed at today's interest rates.

Look at Youngstown of the past when the steel mills were the major industry of the area, utopia of good jobs, hope for the future, promise of a better life for our children. Youngstown of the present is dependent, unable to support themselves, aging deteriorating city, declining population, decreased wealth. In which scenario are we better off? Obama says we're all in this together...trouble is, we're all in this same rubber boat that 's about to sink!

Suggest removal:

14greene(167 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

z123go, it was Mr. Biden that introduced race, not me. Mr, Biden was speaking to a Black audience.
BTW, google Y-town tax accountant before Apr 15th.

Suggest removal:

15JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

@ DwightK :

Romney does appear to suffer from foot-in-mouth disease on too many occasions.

Executive level comments are not meant for the general public which often misinterprets them as arrogant and slanderous.

Suggest removal:

16Knightcap(699 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Too many in the wagon and not enough pulling the wagon.

Suggest removal:

17JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

> > Too many in the wagon and not enough pulling the wagon. < <

That is precisely why Romney needs to take charge of the business in Washington.

Suggest removal:

18300(554 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

I have to laugh at all the working-class idiots and pensioners who don't realize that he's talking about them.

Also, Joe, the reason why there's a backlash against businesses is that people are finally realizing that the system's slanted in business' favor. With all the loopholes, write-offs, and deductions, businesses hardly pay any taxes anymore (as compared to 50 years ago when businesses paid more than people did). I know, I own a few LLCs, I write off practically everything I do. It's not fair, but I'm not about to be a martyr.

Suggest removal:

19JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

@ 300 :

> > I own a few LLCs, I write off practically everything I do. It's not fair < <

Quit apologizing, it certainly is fair, according to the law, which I assume you obey.

The only ones who think it is not fair are those who can not position themselves to do the same.

This becomes an instrument of Obama's class warfare. Don't lower yourself to that level.

Suggest removal:

20JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

> > If Mitt wants to give lectures about who is paying what then why does he continue to hide his tax returns? < <

If he is not compelled to do so by law, then he should not do it.

That is his business that no one other than his accountants and the IRS need to see.

Suggest removal:

21300(554 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Of course I obey the law, I'm just pointing out that our system is skewed in the favor of business owners.

I don't have any personal security issues that I need to cover for, so I'm able to admit that I benefit disproportionately from the system due to my LLCs. I still can't believe that the American people accept a Capital Gains tax that taxes that income at a lower rate than those who actually work for their income.

There's nothing fair about it.

By the way, do you think for one second that I'd quit investing if Capital Gains went up to 30 or 40%? Of course not, it's still money that I managed to earn without doing any actual (or at most, very little) work.

Suggest removal:

22JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

@ 300 :

> > it's still money that I managed to earn without doing any actual (or at most, very little) work. < <

The "amount of work" is a different issue.

The important thing is that you have capital at risk. Your gains, if any, should be compensated for the risk taken through a lower tax rate.

Suggest removal:

23LLoyd(8 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Guys, where exactly do you think tax breaks come from? Write-off or etc....????? Wait for it.... Wait for it..... wait for it....

The GOVERNMENT! Which is really Congress that allows these things to be negotiated between the Repugs and Demo's.

It's a BIG A$$ gov't entitlement! Don't attempt to sugar coat it, it is what it is.... And the ones that do pay income taxes end up paying for those so called write-offs "cough" I mean entitlements.

Just Saying

Suggest removal:

24JoeFromHubbard(1038 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

@ LLoyd :

You're exactly right. The whole tax code is a convoluted disaster of "breaks, loopholes, and handouts." It is designed to raise revenue, steer social behavior, and provide selective advantages or punishments among other things.

It is skewed by those who have the capacity to influence Congress.

Suggest removal:

25rayt(8 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

Just remember this, Mr. Romney, that this rabble you're talking about... they do most of the working and paying and living and dying in this community. Well, is it too much to have them work and pay and live and die in a couple of decent rooms and a bath?

Suggest removal:

26LtMacGowan(643 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

If anything the government isn't doing enough to help the poor, disabled, veterans, and elderly. you realize that full welfare assistance in Pennsylvania for some one with no kids is $86 every 2 weeks and $200 of foodstamps a month? I couldn't even imagine how to live on $43 a week.

Our veterans come home disabled and we live in poverty.

God forbid you get sick in Ohio. If you are over 19, under 60, and not disabled (how are you going to get on disability if you don't have the medical insurance to see a doctor that you're trying to apply for!?) or don't have any children under 19, forget it. The state says too bad suffer.

You can always go to the Emergency Room but all they are required to do is stabilize you i.e. make sure you don't die.

Its sickening that we spend billions on bombers but our vets are in poverty and people are sick.

Suggest removal:

27IslandMike(752 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Mitt-Flopper: ‘Victims’ comment not elegantly stated.

Obama thought it was VERY elegantly stated. Mitt-Flopper has dropped in the polls like the Titanic hitting an iceberg!!

Suggest removal:

28kurtw(848 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Romney has to be faulted for his political skills (non-existent), rather than the value, or lack of value, of his message.

The bottom line: our present course is unsustainable- we can't continue to borrow 40% of every dollar we spend at the Federal Level and the only people who seem to be talking about that are some of the Republicans (the Tea Party Members). We need entitlement reform more than anything else- especially of Medicare- if we wish to not end up like the SS Titanic- under the waves and sinking fast.

Unfortunately, the GOP has a habit of picking their most inept politicians to carry their message: Romney, McCain, Dole, etc. and these lightweights have to come up against superb natural (read talented) pols of the caliber of Slick Willy, and (much as I hate to say this) Barack Hussain Obama.

That's like, to use a sports metaphor, putting up a Muhammed Ali against and amateur who like to "put on the gloves" on weekennds. A Bloodbath.

The GOP would have been better off - with someone like Santorum, or even Newt- people that had the courage of their convictions and could effectively communicate.

Political Skills and Statesmanship are not the same. In Ronald Reagan, who I believe will go down as one of 20th Century America's greatest statesman (FDR- the condescending Elitist not withstanding) we had someone with both. God, please send him back to us, on Loan: the Country Needs Him Desperately!

Suggest removal:

29cambridge(3010 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Last I heard reagan was a lump in a dirty diaper. Come to think of it, that probably is a better choice than romney.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport