- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Ohio ballot board works on rewording Nov. redistricting measure

Published: Fri, September 14, 2012 @ 12:06 a.m.

By Marc Kovac



The state Ballot Board met in emergency session Thursday to reword ballot language for a redistricting reform measure that will be decided by voters in November.

The meeting came a day after the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that language earlier approved by the board, which is headed by Republican Secretary of State Jon Husted and controlled by Republicans, was inaccurate, prejudicial and missing information voters would need to make informed decisions.

The state’s high court ordered the board to change wording related to how members of a new 12-person commission that will draw congressional and legislative districts will be selected, what criteria will be used to establish new lines and how the commission will be funded.

Husted and two other Republicans on the Ballot Board opted to address the justices’ concerns by deleting some words and adding language straight from the proposed constitutional amendment instead of attempting to summarize.

But the two Democratic members of the board and representatives of Voters First, the group that collected signatures to place the issue before voters, were critical of the changes. They said the final language approved was full of legalese that would confuse voters.

“I don’t really think it helps the voters understand what the amendment’s about,” said Ann Henkener, redistricting specialist for the League of Women Voters of Ohio, speaking on behalf of Voters First. She added, “They certainly did not in any way, shape or form comply with the spirit of the court decision.”

Democratic Ballot Board member Mark Griffin added during Thursday’s meeting, “You shouldn’t have to have three years of law school and a law degree and having passed the bar in order to understand what you’re voting on.”

State Issue 2 proposes creating a new citizens commission to draw legislative and congressional districts. The board would include four Republicans, four Democrats and four nonpartisan voters, with eight of the 12 members required to sign off on any districts.

Lobbyists, politicians and large campaign contributors would not be allowed to serve, and districts would be drawn following specified criteria, including compactness and competition.

The proposal would replace the existing apportionment and redistricting process, which critics say favors whichever political party is in power. If OK’d by voters, the new panel would form immediately and could revisit maps drawn last year that critics say lean too heavily in favor of GOP candidates.

The Ballot Board signed off on abbreviated language for the issue in mid-August, but Voters First filed suit shortly thereafter, saying the results were biased and inaccurate and did not provide an adequate overview of the proposed amendment.

The Ohio Supreme Court sided with the group late Wednesday, and Husted called an emergency meeting of the Ballot Board, saying the language needed to be finalized quickly to provide sufficient time to send ballots to overseas and military voters.


1ndawket(10 comments)posted 3 years, 10 months ago

If you want to understand Issue 2, read this ballot language submitted by Voters First to the Ohio Ballot Board. http://votersfirstohio.com/author/staff/ It’s accurate and understandable. Share it with all the voters you know to remove the intentional fog opponents are creating. Speak out against politicians who try to rig elections.

Suggest removal:

2JulietZavon(18 comments)posted 3 years, 10 months ago

Voting yes on Issue 2 is a step toward fixing a broken system that currently lets politicians rig congressional districts to favor their own party. Both parties do it. For 40 years the League of Women Voters has sought a bi-partisan solution to the problem, but the dominant party is never agreeable. They care more about their self-interest than the communities they are supposed to serve. Now, they are doing it again: they favor confusing language over clear language to describe Issue 2 on the ballot. Ohioans deserve better. Support Issue 2 to tell them we’re tired of their games at our expense.

Suggest removal:

3redeye1(5678 comments)posted 3 years, 10 months ago

Boy when things don't go a liberal way they get petitions out. This has been going on for over forty years and now that the GOP is in control they don't like it. I will be voting NO on issue #2

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes