- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Gerberry’s legislative record shows commitment to public

Published: Tue, October 16, 2012 @ 12:00 a.m.

While we are unstinting in our support of state Rep. Ronald V. Gerberry’s re-election bid, we are impressed with his challenger, Kimberly S. Poma, a member of the Boardman school board.

In a region that is predominantly Democratic, Republican Poma is a public official who does the area proud. Unfortunately, she’s in the wrong race.

With her strong base of support in Boardman, where she has owned a business and has a long history of community service, Poma could have been a strong county-wide candidate. She might even have made a county commissioner race interesting. Unfortunately, she received bad advice fromthe county Republican Party and the Republican legislative caucus in Columbus. They urged her to run, but have not given her the financial support necessary to conduct an aggressive campaign in the 59th House District that includes Boardman.

It is revealing that the worst Poma will say about Gerberry, who makes no apologies for being a long-time officeholder, is that he has become complacent after holding elected office for 38 years. But Gerberry, who has served as a member of the Austintown Board of Education, state representative, county recorder and now again state representative, vehemently disagrees that he has slowed down or is taking his responsibilities for granted.

An objective review of his legislative record and his direct involvement in such crucial issues as state funding for public education and local governments leaves no doubt that he is truly committed to serving his constituents.

The current 59th District, created by Republicans in Columbus that sought to give the GOP an election advantage wherever possible, may pose a challenge to Gerberry, a resident of Austintown. In the redistricting, all but four precincts in Austintown were taken away from the new district. It now encompasses Beaver, Berlin, Boardman, Canfield, Ellsworth, Goshen, Green, Jackson, Milton, Poland, Smith and Springfield townships, the city of Canfield and the villages of Beloit, Craig Beach, New Middletown and Sebring.

Gerberry insists his record in Columbus reflects a willingness to work on behalf of communities in the Mahoning Valley that are not always in his district. A Vindicator news story last week detailed the myriad initiatives that the state representative launched on behalf on the region.

Pressed by The Vindicator’s editorial board to specify how she thinks Gerberry has failed his constituents, Poma replied, “I don’t know [Gerberry] has fought hard enough for schools.” We wish she had chosen something else, given that when the Democrats were in control of the House Gerberry served as chairman of the Education Committee and now, as a minority member of the committee, he has been vocally opposed to any attempt by the state to cut funding for kindergarten through 12th grade.

GOP agenda

Despite his efforts to stop the General Assembly and the governor from stripping funding for public education, the Republicans in power have ridden roughshod over school districts.

To her credit, Poma, who has seen first-hand what is happening to an excellent school district like Boardman as it struggles to make ends meet, is willing to criticize her party’s willingness to take money away from top performing districts and funnel it into charter schools that aren’t performing up to standard.

Gerberry’s legislative record, especially after the 2010 election when Republicans won all statewide offices, shows that his experience and knowledge of how things work in the General Assembly are a definite plus.

The Vindicator endorses his bid for another term, but also urges Poma to stay involved in politics.


1Alexinytown(246 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

"Unfortunately, she received bad advice fromthe county Republican Party and the Republican legislative caucus in Columbus."

And instead she should run for county office? That is better advice how? Do you guys even look at things like indexes and turnout? How on earth would she have been better running county wide?

If the Vindicator Editorial Board would like to comment on where Kim would make up losses of 150-1 and 200-1 in a number of Youngstown City precincts, I would love to hear where. I would love to hear where she would overcome the deficits in Austintown.

In order for her to overcome that, should would not only have to beat Gerberry in Boardman, she would outright have to destroy him in numbers.

Guess what, the 59th District is more favorable in numbers guys, like it or not. If you think you can do a better job running these kinds of campaigns, you are welcome the opportunity.

But to say she was given bad advice is insulting, because everyone did their homework on this one on which would have been a better race.

Suggest removal:

2youngspartanrepublican(92 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

I'm confused. Rather than run in the most Republican parts of the county run in the whole county? Kim wouldn't stand a chance in Austintown, Campbell, and Youngstown. However, she should run up huge margins in the rural southern part of the county, and win in the suburbs of Poland, Canfield, and Boardman due to her name recognition (PSHS Graduate, Boardman School Board member) and relative strength of the Republican Party in these areas. Geez vindy, you make zero sense here.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport