facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Commission holds off on decision on small livestock in Youngstown



Published: Wed, November 21, 2012 @ 12:07 a.m.

By Ashley Luthern

aluthern@vindy.com

YOUNGSTOWN

The city’s planning commission agreed Tuesday to hold off on recommending a new redevelopment and zoning plan to city council after hearing from residents about policies on small livestock and bees.

City residents and members of the Mahoning Valley Food Policy Council told the commission they support a simplified process where residents go to one department to get small-livestock approval instead of the current method of going through the health department, planning commission, public hearings and then city council, which approves such permits on a case-by-case basis.

Sophia Buggs is preparing an eight-lot farm on the city’s South Side for “Lady Buggs Garden.”

“I want to raise hens and bees. This is all about eating local and having access to fresh food,” she said.

Buggs and other supporters said the commission could impose limits on the number of animals and regulate the coops, including their distance from residential structures.

“If I can only have three chickens, that’s fine,” she said.

The redevelopment-code draft first was released in February, revamping and streamlining the section on small livestock and specifically excluded roosters as a nuisance. In the most recent version, the language reverted back to the original case-by-case policy.

The Mahoning Valley Food Policy Council submitted a letter Tuesday that stated guidelines for cleanliness, and provisions that prohibit roaming animals could allay some concerns.

It also noted that Cleveland allows six chickens per standard-sized lots while Canton and Columbus allow an unlimited number as long as the coop is 50 and 100 feet, respectively, from a street.

John B. Slanina of Youngstown said the change would show the city is progressive and added it likely would save costs in the health department.

“This would have a minimal impact in neighborhoods. ... This can always be rescinded if it’s being abused,” he said.

But Councilman John R. Swierz, 7th Ward, disagreed, saying the city already has trouble with its dog ordinances, and livestock would be no different. He also said he expects more noise from small livestock.

“We need to tread on this very lightly. I think it will be a complaint in the neighborhoods,” he said.

Law Director Anthony Farris suggested moving the redevelopment code to next month’s agenda, and the commission agreed and said it will take public comments in the interim before deciding on a recommendation.


Comments

1whitesabbath(738 comments)posted 1 year, 5 months ago

I need me some fresh brown and green eggs get this passed !!!!!

Suggest removal:

2UsuallyBlunt(105 comments)posted 1 year, 5 months ago

The fellas from Detroit could use some "mules", their current carriers seem to be dying off!

Suggest removal:

3zz3(874 comments)posted 1 year, 5 months ago

hell we can't handle the animals we have on the south side now!!

Suggest removal:

4commyliberal(93 comments)posted 1 year, 5 months ago

I live in Austintown on a residential lot, approx. 1/3 acre, and I have 10 hens. They are contained at the back of our property which abuts a large wooded non-developed property. Our neighbors are OK with the birds BECAUSE we keep them contained. Hens are not as noisy as dogs since they do not crow. We got the chickens because I wanted my children to see where some of their food came from and so I could teach them the importance of treating animals we use for food with dignity & respect.

A pet owner can be good or bad and the same can be said of someone who owns small livestock. I keep my two dogs in my yard or house, feed them, get them vet care & keep them licensed. They don't roam the neighborhood, bark or attack people. Small livestock if cared for by a responsible owner should not be any different than any other pet. There should be a limit on the number of livestock just like there is a limit on dogs.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport