facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Judge plans to deny bid for park Xmas displays



Published: Mon, November 19, 2012 @ 3:21 p.m.

Judge plans to deny bid for park Xmas displays

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A Los Angeles federal judge has indicated she will deny a bid by churches to force suburban Santa Monica to reopen spaces in a city park to private displays including Christmas Nativity scenes.

U.S. District Court Judge Audrey Collins announced her intent in a tentative ruling given to attorneys in advance of a hearing this morning.

An attorney representing a group of Christian churches says he will appeal. The group contends its free-speech rights are being violated.

Christmastime Nativity scenes had been erected in Palisades Park for decades. Last year, atheists overwhelmed the city’s auction process for display sites, winning 18 of 21 slots and triggering a bitter dispute.

The city then banned private, unattended displays at the park.


Comments

1paulydel(1318 comments)posted 2 years ago

That judge is a moron. Christmas Day is a holiday it is not called anything else. I think that those of you who oppose Christmas should have to work a regular shift and not get the day off. If get employed at a job they should have something there for the holidays you oppose that way they can make up a works schedule to include you.

Suggest removal:

2LtMacGowan(653 comments)posted 2 years ago

Good. The city has no business displaying religious materials to begin with.

Suggest removal:

3paulparks(235 comments)posted 2 years ago

LtMac,

My atheist friend... how are you? Still railing against Christianity, eh?

Suggest removal:

4NoBS(1981 comments)posted 2 years ago

I don't think this should have been left to the courts at all. The atheists 'loaded the meeting' last year. Shame on the churches if they allow that to happen again.

Suggest removal:

5charms(228 comments)posted 2 years ago

Wikipedia says this:

Religion is a collection of belief systems, cultural systems, and world views that
relate humanity to spirituality and, sometimes, to moral values.

This is a pretty good definition of religion. Under this definition, government now promotes the "religion" of atheism in public. I can call atheism a religion because atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. This is a belief system (or "non-belief" system, if you like) that is promoted above the deistic view. So atheists have succeeded in turning the Constitution on its head.

Suggest removal:

6Lifes2Short(3877 comments)posted 2 years ago

All this over a Christmas Nativity scene. Is this world that "petty " that because some certain non-believers have to go to court (court that is) to fight for not having a "innocent" Nativity scene displayed for everyone to enjoy. You don't like it, don't go to it. Real simple.
You atheists are pitiful, you don't believe in nothing so how could you ever be happy? You can't. But let others enjoy the life we all been given instead of hating all the time.
I will keep "Christ in Christmas" till the day I die. And that, you atheists, you will never be able to take away.

Suggest removal:

7LtMacGowan(653 comments)posted 2 years ago

Nobody is saying you can't have a nativity scene or whatever on PRIVATE Property. Its having it on public property that is the issue.

Suggest removal:

8Lifes2Short(3877 comments)posted 2 years ago

ltmac

"Its having it on public property that is the issue."

And exactly why is that a issue?

Suggest removal:

9LtMacGowan(653 comments)posted 2 years ago

The Establishment clause? Which the courts have ruled time and time again that public venues are no place for religion.

Have an issue with it take it up with the Supreme Court

Suggest removal:

10Lifes2Short(3877 comments)posted 1 year, 12 months ago

ltmac

""Which the courts have ruled time and time again that public venues are no place for religion.""

""Christmastime Nativity scenes had been erected in Palisades Park for decades. ""

So for "decades," this innocent Christmastime Nativity scenes were really pushing "religion?" Christmas Time is celebration of Jesus Christ's birth, whether you believe it not, it's just pretty decorations for people to enjoy. It's not forcing religion on anyone, if anything, I'm sure all the people, including little children, for "DECADES" went to this display and enjoyed this pretty scenery. But because of these "few" morons now no one can enjoy it.
What pitiful ignorant people we have in society today. When they get left behind, there the ones that are going to suffer and for good reason.

Merry Christmas! They will never stop me from saying it.

This guy in the picture must really hate running by these pretty scenes. I'm sure he is scarred for life now because religion was forced upon him.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a...

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes