- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Phillips Mfg. will challenge Niles strikebreaker law

Published: Sun, November 18, 2012 @ 12:09 a.m.

BY Jordan Cohen



The attorney representing Phillips Manufacturing, whose workers have been on strike for more than two months, says he will file a constitutional challenge to the city’s strikebreaker law.

The company has been charged in a criminal case with hiring replacement workers, a violation of a Niles ordinance which prohibits the employment of “strikebreakers” during a legal work stoppage.

“The local law is pre-empted by a series of federal laws and court decisions and is unconstitutional,” said attorney Patrick Wilson of Warren, the company’s legal counsel. Wilson said he advised Niles Municipal Court Judge Thomas Townley of his intent to challenge the law’s constitutionality during a pre-trial hearing in the judge’s chambers Friday.

Wilson said that a similar strikebreaker ordinance in Columbus was ruled unconstitutional in a 1988 court case. “That will be included in my filing,” the attorney said.

“We think they’ve hired around 20 people since the strike began,” said Tony Beltz, vice president of United Steelworkers Local 4564, who, along with several striking union members, waited for the outcome of the pre-trial conference. The 44 union employees struck the Walnut Street plant Sept. 13 after an impasse in contract negotiations.

Atty. Terry Swauger, city prosecutor who filed the criminal charge against the company, said he doesn’t agree with Wilson’s contention. “I feel confident that our law will stand up to the challenge,” Swauger said.

The prosecutor said the city ordinance was enacted in 1964 and amended in 1971. A constitutional challenge of the law was filed in 1989 during a strike against the Amweld Corporation, which had brought in replacement workers. However the labor dispute was subsequently settled, and the constitutional issue was never litigated.

Penalties for violating the ordinance are fines of up to $500 and a six-month jail sentence. “I’m assuming a corporate executive would have to serve the sentence,” Swauger said.

Trial has been set for Jan. 7, however, Swauger said the proceeding could be delayed depending on the time it takes for Townley to rule on the constitutional issue.

The USW’s Beltz said contract negotiations are at a standstill, and no new talks have been scheduled. “We emailed a proposal that they turned down, and they don’t want to negotiate,” Beltz said. The union vice president said he believes the company has decided to “wait us out.”

Brad Garlock, Phillips human-resources director, declined comment about the status of negotiations. “[We] remain positive and hopeful that agreement for a new collective-bargaining agreement is possible,” he said in a written statement to The Vindicator.

Phillips Manufacturing produces metal products for the commercial and residential construction industries.


1NoBS(2757 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

This is why we don't have manufacturing in this country; too many teabagger business owners thinking they're above the law, and can do whatever they want. That's why unions were formed in the first place - to counteract that sort of treatment.

Sorry, Wilson/Phillips, you have to follow ALL the laws, not just the ones you want to.

Suggest removal:

2Harleyfatz(3 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Cheers to Phillips Mfg. and boo to the city of Niles for such an antiquated silly ordinance. Time to face reality people, the need for unions in this country has long passed. Go to work, get off your ass and do your job!
Good luck again Phillips!!!!

Suggest removal:

3Attis(1128 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Scabs, like the thieves they are, should of course be outlawed and those who employ these thieves should, like any criminal organization, be fined and imprisoned. That's what a Nation under God would do.

Suggest removal:

4justsayin(42 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

If the final outcome of this situation is the permanent loss of jobs due to the company moving or shutting down, I would love to hear one of these loudmouth union lemmings justify it. This ordinance won't hold up to scrutiny by any court outside the area.

Suggest removal:

5cozmo(32 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

These so called scabs need to support their families too. With unemployment rates around 8% and 10% people are desperate on both sides of this spectrum.

Suggest removal:

6Bigben(1996 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

The desperation is what the vultures prey upon. Unions while far from perfect were a lot better than being at the mercy of big business. Read some history and get an accurate perspective instead of what some corporate news program tells you to parrot.

Jobs left the valley because business wanted it that way and congress and the presidents have repeatedly sided with business to foster lopsided trade agreements. They want wage slaves with no rights not workers.

Trade unions and such go way way back not just the early part of the 20th century in this country. Again stop being ignorant parrots and study history.You might get your azz kicked but if you don't stand up to the bully you will get your azz kicked, repeatedly.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes