- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

The last time Congress dallied, the economy paid the price

Published: Mon, November 12, 2012 @ 12:00 a.m.

Congress doesn’t have to drive off the fiscal cliff to do the economy serious damage. All it has to do is stand on the edge long enough acting as if it may jump, and the economy is going to take a hit.

For reference, remember what happened when Congress diddled over whether it was going to increase the debt ceiling in 2011? All but the most stubborn members of Congress knew they were going to have to raise the ceiling or the economy would take an enormous hit. But still, they put off acting just long enough that the nation’s credit rating was downgraded anyway. And the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 635 points in a day.

The lesson to be learned is that inaction has its consequences.

And it is not difficult to guess the immediate consequences when Congress is in a position of causing economic uncertainty and reducing consumer confidence just as we’re entering the biggest buying season of the year. The consequences grow as 2012 gets shorter and 2013 gets closer.

Fifteen months after the debt limit fiasco of 2011, the nation is flirting with yet another unnecessary crisis.

Congress started it

Indeed, this crisis is a direct outgrowth of the summer of 2011, because the temporary solution to the long-term problem of fiscal irresponsibility was the Budget Control Act of 2011. That act gave Congress three months to reach a budget compromise — which it didn’t — and then kicked the can down the road, past the presidential and congressional elections of 2012. Those elections are now history. We all know that we’re going to have the same Democratic president, Barack Obama, for the next four years, and essentially the same Democratic Senate and Republican House for the next two years.

It falls to this lame-duck Congress to avert a crisis it put in motion. That’s because under the Budget Control Act of 2011, across-the-board spending cuts will kick in Jan. 1: about $55 billion in defense spending and about $55 billion in domestic spending. Doctors will see their Medicare reimbursement cut by 2 percent.

Oh, and the “Bush Tax Cuts” that were supposed to expire two years ago but have been extended to avoid worsening the recession, will all expire with the first of the year. Other tax cuts are also due to expire, including the 2 percent cut in Social Security payroll taxes, and unless it is amended, the Alternative Minimum Tax will hammer middle-income families for an average of about $3,700.

The net effect will be the loss of an estimated 3 million jobs and a quick descent into a double-dip recession.

White House parlEys

President Obama will be meeting with corporate leaders in the White House on Wednesday and with Republican and Democratic congressional leaders Friday.

He appears ready to use the bully pulpit — and the grass-roots support his organization built during the presidential campaign — to push for a speedy and comprehensive response to a vexing problem.

One of the main sticking points appears to remain the fact that a majority of congressional Republicans are tied to the Grover Norquist pledge that keeps them from increasing taxes, even on Americans whose wealth has steadily grown while the earnings and wealth of the middle class has been stagnant or declined.

It is time for the Norquist pledge to be consigned to the dust bin of history. Norquist is a political charlatan who has never stood for election yet manages to bully gutless elected officials into towing his line.

It’s so obviously incongruous that no less an established conservative commentator as Bill Kristol, Weekly Standard editor, is suggesting that it is time for Republicans to rethink the Democratic position that taxes be allowed to go up on the wealthy.

“It won’t kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires,” he said on “Fox News Sunday.” He suggested that Republicans take Obama’s offer, and questioned why the Republican Party would “fall on its sword to defend a bunch of millionaires, half of whom voted Democratic and half of whom live in Hollywood and are hostile.”

The larger question is why House Republicans would hold the vast majority of their constituents hostage for, as Kristol puts it, “a bunch of millionaires.”

What’s at stake

What Obama is suggesting is preserving the Bush tax cuts except for those at the top rate, who would see an increase from 35 percent after Dec. 31 to 39.6 percent, the rate in place during the Clinton administration. That would raise about $1 trillion over 10 years, but it would also help rationalize spending cuts that are going to hurt lower income people.

It’s time for Congress and President Obama to reach an agreement that reflects the national consensus of last Tuesday’s election and that is in the best interest of the American people. And that interest is best served by avoiding any further and unnecessary economic turmoil.


1redeye1(5669 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

WE can only hope that the GOP stands its ground and doesn't cave in to them.

Suggest removal:

2redeye1(5669 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

SeriouslyNow What incentive will people have to keep working and trying to succeed if the GOV"T takes away their earning to feed the WELFARE class. What we should be doing is looking at the entitlements such as welfare. First we have to make it harder to get. Secondly there must be limits set on how much they can get, how long they can be on it. No more additional monies for every child they have. limit one! All EBT card must have a photo indentifying the person so that they can't sell or give their card to anyone for cash etc. This is where we start if we want our country back, Quit the wellfare handouts now/.

Suggest removal:

3redeye1(5669 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

Take a look at the stock market the day after the election. Down over 300 pts, and falling every day since. Unemployment rising again. So when do we start blaming the sitting President, you know BO for things . Or are the D party members going blame everyone else but themselves. Just more BS from the demon party.

Suggest removal:

4georgejeanie(1538 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

I hope the house does not bargain at all.
the country can not stand more debt. Let us go over the socalled "physical cliff", and let the strong survive and the weak either pull up their boot straps and start contributing, or they can wallow in their own laziness,No more free handouts for life, either produce or goodbye. I do not have a problem with government helping people who are injured or in capacitated through no fault of their own, but to keep handing people money when they could be working is ridiculous.

Suggest removal:

5saddad(655 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

Right on! Time for a major jobs program.

Suggest removal:

6charms(228 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

The main reason we have a fiscal problem in this country is not too much spending or too little taxes. It's abortion.

We have lost 40-50 million productive members of society since Roe v. Wade. And with our zero birth rate there will be fewer and fewer young people to build this country up.

Raise taxes..., cut spending..., BALONEY! Stop destroying the next generation of Americans.

Suggest removal:

7redeye1(5669 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

SN The only perosn to judge who is the fittest is YOU! If you want to survive , you will work or die the choose is YOURS!

Suggest removal:

8jojuggie(1725 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

gdog, I don't know what website you get your info from. Reagan accumulated US debt a little over 1 TRILLION, in 8 yrs.
Obama has accumulated over 5 TRILLION in 4 yrs.

Reagan began his term with 16% interest, on new const., he inherited from Carter (the 2nd worst president in our history), and in 2 yrs had interest rates lowered with the economy booming again.

Bush, the younger, inherited the dotcom buble from Clinton, then 9-11 happened. The 1st 6 yrs of his adm were good considering all of the events that occured on his watch. The last 2 yrs of his adm Pelosi & Reid took over & then our troubles began.


Suggest removal:

9NoBS(2832 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

"40-50 million PRODUCTIVE members of society"??!! Really? Wow! None of the aborted fetuses were drug-addicted? None were mentally or physically damaged from the mother's actions during her pregnancy, including her drug abuse or destructive habits? None of them were going to be born into a life of crime, abuse, neglect, and abandonment?

Tell me, charms, how many unwanted babies have YOU adopted?

Suggest removal:

10charms(228 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago


Okay Mr. "Quality of Life." Since when do mothers play God? Since Roe v. Wade. What are the current most deadly words in the English language (especially in China)? "IT'S A GIRL."

Your "Frankensteinian" view of life would have denied life to my retarded brother, to my autistic son, and to my father with altzheimers.

Be careful, NoBS, someone down the line may decide that your life is not worth living some day!

Suggest removal:

11andersonathan(687 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

All this and no one mentions the cost of Obama Care that will soon be added to some ones taxes or passed to the consumer [ Papa Johns Denny's ] and others raising prices just a little and cutting hours.

Suggest removal:

12jojuggie(1725 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

"Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen.

"Now add this, "Many of those who refuse, or are unable, to prove they are citizens will receive free insurance paid for by those who are forced to buy insurance because they are citizens.

Suggest removal:

13UsuallyBlunt(105 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

Survival of the fittest...no-one CHOOSES who is fittest...unless of course it is Mother Nature...or maybe...Sam Colt...

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes