facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

 

« News Home

Gerberry would tax fracking wastewater recycling operations



Published: Fri, March 30, 2012 @ 10:57 a.m.

Gerberry would tax fracking wastewater recycling operations

COLUMBUS

State Rep. Ronald V. Gerberry of Austintown, D-59th, has introduced legislation that would tax fracking wastewater recycling operations to offset infrastructure wear-and-tear from the oil and gas industry.

Under the new legislation, counties, townships or municipal corporations where brine recycling facilities are located could impose a 17.5 cents-per-barrel tax on recycled brine.

“Brine recycling facilities can be hard on local infrastructure,” Gerberry said. “Townships and counties don’t have the resources to deal with additional costs like worn-out roads resulting from increased traffic. This bill will assist them in generating needed revenue to cover these increased expenses.”

The only fracking wastewater site in the Valley is currently Patriot Water Treatment LLC in Warren.

Patriot does not pay the state’s “brine tax,” which levies a five-cent-per-barrel fee on brine originating in-state and a 20-cent-per-barrel fee on out-of-state brine.

Another proposed recycling facility in Mahoning County has not yet been announced.

Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake Energy Corp. has a recycling system in Carrollton. It is not known how local governments could tax recycled brine since that data is not tracked by the state.

In Mahoning and Trumbull counties, the engineer’s offices have developed road-maintenance agreements with drilling companies to pay for road repairs and infrastructure updates.

Marilyn Kenner, chief deputy engineer in Mahoning County has repeatedly said the business relationship between the county and the drilling companies has worked so far, and does not want to see state-mandated road-maintenance agreements take effect.


Comments

1mahoningcovoice(11 comments)posted 2 years, 8 months ago

how bout allowing the counties, townships, and cites to tax these injection wells also. These injection wells for waste water are nothing more than a "landfield" for liquid waste. These counties, townships, and cities would need the monies to respond to earth quakes caused by these wells as well as the damage to the roads and the pollution to the ground water. Gerberry, Hagan should be worried about these waste water injection wells popping up all over the place. 2 in Coitsville, 1 in youngstown, 1 planned for Beaver. Get on top of these landfields. We tax BFI for solid waste and make them treat the liquid run-off of the solid waste so whats the difference for liquid waste?? A waste water injection well is just another way of saying "Landfield". And these townships and counties are going to need the monies to put in water lines (after the ground water for drinking becomes pollutted) and fix roads and respond to spills and disasters at these sites!! Coitsville, Beaver, Hubbard, Youngstown, Campbell should get on top of this. The county has the Green Team set up for BFI we can use that for these waste water injection wells.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes