- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Congressmen, challengers spar over Medicare plan

Published: Wed, March 21, 2012 @ 12:07 a.m.





By David Skolnick



With the unveiling of the proposed Republican budget bill that significantly impacts Medicare, U.S. Rep. Bill Johnson and his Democratic challenger took shots at each other over their positions on the senior health-care program.

Ex-U.S. Rep. Charlie Wilson, a Democrat from St. Clairsville who lost to Johnson in the 2010 election, said the Republican incumbent’s vote for the bill, released Tuesday by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, “would kill Medicare as we know it today. Seniors will pay the price while millionaires will benefit.”

During a Tuesday interview with The Vindicator, Wilson said the proposed bill is “the wrong way to go, but it shows the thinking of the Republican Party.”

Rather than eliminate tax cuts to the wealthy, Wilson said Johnson and other Republicans want seniors to pay more for Medicare.

Though this bill will be a major campaign issue nationwide, it’s unlikely to go further than the Republican-controlled House. The Democratic-controlled U.S. Senate opposes the bill as does President Barack Obama, a Democrat.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is targeting 41 incumbent Republican House members, including Johnson, with automated phone calls urging residents to call congressmen to oppose the proposed Medicare plan.

The plan doesn’t change Medicare for those at least 55 years old. Neither Johnson of Marietta, R-6th, who is 57 years old, nor Wilson, who is 69, would be affected by the bill.

For those under 55, the plan would provide a set amount of money for future Medicare beneficiaries to purchase a private health plan or the traditional government-administered program through a new Medicare exchange, starting in 2023, according to the Associated Press.

Also, the plan gradually increases the eligibility age beginning in 2034, from 65 to 67.

If nothing is done, Medicare will be bankrupt in a decade, Johnson told The Vindicator.

“It’s laughable that Charlie Wilson would attack the Ryan budget,” Johnson said. Wilson “voted for the president’s takeover of our health system.”

That health-care law cut $500 billion from Medicare, Johnson said.

Wilson said the Ryan proposal would provide an $8,000 annual voucher, for each Medicare participant for health costs, which isn’t enough for many seniors.

The Ryan proposal isn’t a voucher system, but a premium-supported program, Johnson said. The congressman’s staff said the $8,000 figure is an average that someone would receive under the plan and not a cap.

Seniors “will choose a plan,” Johnson said. “Charlie Wilson says we’re choosing millionaires over seniors. Nothing could be further from the truth.”

Wilson and Johnson criticized each other for voting lock-step with their party leaders to the detriment of their constituents.

Like Wilson and most Democrats, U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan of Niles, D-17th, said this proposal “shows that congressional Republicans have learned nothing from the past 10 years, and it gives a clear picture of their priorities: The wealthy get lower taxes while the middle class and seniors get higher taxes and higher Medicare costs.”

The Republican proposal is designed to “re-create the divisiveness we saw last year in Congress,” he said.

Marisha Agana of Howland, Ryan’s Republican challenger and a pediatrician, commended Paul Ryan “for the brave attempt to address the problem of looming insolvency of the Medicare program in our country by proposing a national budget that will overhaul the system in the next decade.”

The proposal, she said, is “a step in the right direction. We cannot continue to ignore this problem.”

Agana said the federal government needs to gain control over fraudulent companies that “plague our current Medicare system.”


1chuck_carney(499 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

Isn't it odd that ryan and his cronies have no problem taking contributions from the area's wealthy, such as Cafaro, Zoldan, Humphries, Debartolo, etc. Does this mean he will give their money back and quit doing their bidding in private, while proselytizing he is for the great unwashed. He should unoccupy the incubator since he silently represents the 1%.

Suggest removal:

2CompMan(125 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

Comments from thethinker are very much appreciated and supported. Additionally: 1) Besides the federal goverment spending SS funds on other programs we now have a tax holiday of 2% diverting additional funds from SS. Both Rep & Dems are accountable for this legal "theft" of funds. A temporary holiday on all income would have served better and could have been restored easier than on SS in the future. 2) Medicare is paid by 1.45% of income from employees and 1.45% from employers (self employed 2.9%) regardless of income limitations that control SS. This is also based on a lifetime of workers earnings or 35 to 40 years. We now have 10,000 turning 65 each day now these workers are now just joining Medicare A and paying for B & D. I would support moving the Medicare age to match the SS age (full not early) now not 2034 (20 years earlier for 1/4 of a generation of a 80 year lifetime) for those under 55 to offset expected reductions in shortfalls. 3) the idealogies of both Dem & Rep needs to replaced with genuine best practices for benefit of their constituants.

Suggest removal:

3commoncitizen(961 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

Put Congress in the SS system and see how fast they fix the problem.

Suggest removal:

4faith(200 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

If the tax cuts for the rich (repbulicants call them job creators) were going to help the economy, we would all be doing great. That trickle down BS does not work!! I'm in my 40's and these bums will want me to work till I die. This way I collect nothing. Pay my whole life and you take my money and give tax breaks to millionaires, billionaires, gas and oil companies, give banks a truck load of money. Unbelievable. I hope every republicant gets de-elected. God forbid we have a national health care plan that protects kids and seniors. God forbid we help working people at all. Throw more to the richest 1% and take away from the 99%.

Suggest removal:

5commoncitizen(961 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

faith, the government takes OUR money (working people, that paid into the system) and wants to give it to the people that haven't earned a dime, because they were making more babies so they could "milk" the system.

Suggest removal:

6olddude(201 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

Average couple retiring today have paid in roughly 100k into Medicare but expect to get in return 500k in Medicare benefits till death...as thinker above stated SS trust fund has been pillaged by Congresses run by both parties.. Life expectancy is longer.. Baby Boomers have just started to retire... More people on Medicaid, Food Stamps and other entitlements.. You could tax the 1% folks 90% and just confiscate all of their wealth and it would still not pay for these programs in their current form.. Changes have to take place...

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport