facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Kasich plan: Raise drilling tax, lower income tax



Published: Thu, March 15, 2012 @ 12:10 a.m.

photo

Kasich

RELATED: Kasich proposes $1.74B capital-spending bill

By Marc kovac

and David Skolnick

news@vindy.com

COLUMBUS

Gov. John Kasich is proposing a tax increase on fracking, along with a corresponding income tax cut directly tied to how much the state collects from new oil and gas production.

The governor also wants to consolidate more state programs, lower taxes on smaller banks, implement a comprehensive energy policy, improve job-training programs and create closer ties between private business and public education.

Those initiatives and many others are included in Kasich’s midbiennium review, a lengthy bill being offered midway through the current two-year budget cycle.

The resulting legislation, at an estimated 2,000 pages, is full of policy proposals.

“Over the last 14 months, it’s pretty remarkable what’s been accomplished,” Kasich said, adding later, “This is an ongoing process. Frankly, almost every time I turn around, I find another piece of broken Ohio, so there’s so much more to do.”

Kasich, a Republican, and members of his cabinet unveiled details of the budget plan Wednesday during a two-hour press conference. The Ohio House’s finance committee will take up the legislation today, with extensive hearings planning in comings weeks as lawmakers work to pass the bill before breaking for the summer.

Severance taxes levied on oil and gas production from horizontal hydraulic fracturing will increase, with build-in breaks during the first year or two of operation to allow drillers to recoup their upfront costs.

The changes focus on fracking, an emerging means of extracting oil and gas by pumping large volumes of water, chemicals and sand into deep underground shale formations.

The governor also has proposed about $1 billion in income tax cuts — which represents a decrease of about 5 percent per family — over the next five years, with rates reduced in relation to the taxes collected through fracking.

“We believe that by modernizing our energy taxes, we can allow all 11.5 million Ohioans frankly to benefit ...,” Kasich said. “We are going to have low taxes, at the end of the day, on energy. The question is, who benefits? Do out-of-state oil companies benefit or do Ohioans benefit by having lower income taxes.”

He added, “Every dime of the modernized severance tax would go into a dollar-for-dollar income tax cut.”

Some Democratic state legislators from the Mahoning Valley support Kasich’s proposal to increase taxes for fracking but question why the money would be used for what they call minor tax cuts for residents.

The state’s income tax was cut by 21 percent between the mid-2000s and the beginning of 2011.

“I have issues with the policy,” said state Rep. Ronald V. Gerberry of Austintown, D-59th. “I’m glad we’re going to raise revenue, but there shouldn’t be a tax cut when we continue to have trouble with funding for local governments and public schools. Because of the cuts, governments and schools have had to ask for tax levies so people aren’t saving money.”

Kasich had legislation passed last year to cut the Local Government Fund, a major source of revenue for government entities such as cities and counties, by 25 percent in the first year and an additional 25 percent the next year.

Assistant Minority Senate Leader Joe Schiavoni of Canfield, D-33rd, said he favors the additional tax on the oil and gas industry, “but I’m very, very confused and concerned that he wants to give an income tax [cut] to everyone in Ohio. People from Cincinnati, Toledo and Dayton will receive a tax cut and those in the eastern part of the state [where the drilling is focused] will have to deal with issues such as fixing roads and potential health risks.”

Schiavoni favors using the proposed increased tax dollars for infrastructure improvements in the areas where drilling is happening as well as for job training and to restore local government and education funding.

State Rep. Sean O’Brien of Brookfield, D-65th, has a different thought.

“How will this tax affect the oil and gas industry?” he said. “Taxing it could have an unintended consequence of slowing it down. We need jobs.”

The bill also outlines a number of energy policy changes, including many related to fracking.

The legislation splits regulatory duties for oil and gas production from shale among a half dozen state agencies. The Ohio Department of Natural Resources, for example, will oversee well construction and related regulations, including requiring companies to disclose chemicals used in fracking.

Oil and gas companies will be required to prepay taxes to local governments, at a cost of $25,000 per well, to cover road repair and costs from increased truck traffic and other impacts from increased oil and gas production. Those funds would be recouped by companies over time through tax credits.

Kasich said the budget bill includes $90 million in cost savings.


Comments

1carlesgibbons(1 comment)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

If you could not find a job for a long time it is time to change your career guys.. The time is now. Be on your way to earning an accredited degree. Check out High Speed Universities and they sure find suitable career based on your interests.

Suggest removal:

2valleyred(1097 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

Typical Democrat response. He does something they are always pushing: RAISING TAXES ON OIL, yet they still aren't happy. Typical partisan politicians.

God forbid we lower taxes on our own citizens. The remarks from Schiavoni and Gerberry leave me scratching my head. They want higher taxes on oil, but don't want tax cuts for every Ohio citizen.

Wish they had good competition to vote them out in November.

Suggest removal:

3jrolley325(799 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

i thought raising taxes on "job creators" was always out of the question. you can't have it both ways. when obama wants to do it, he's a socialist, but when kasich wants to do it, it's a good idea.

Suggest removal:

4gdog4766(1473 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

TAX AND SPEND, TAX AND SPEND what a job killer. Now all these oil jobs will go to China, what a socialist. He wont lower our taxes hes already to spend two billion dollars on pet projects. He should learn to live within his means. You repuglicans are giant AS...............

Suggest removal:

5JohnMoormans(1 comment)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

ConsumerTaxReports.org has specified taxpayers a single outlet for looking for tax debt assistance firms, which makes it significantly less difficult to weed through the ripoffs of the business and obtain a efficient tax debt corporation to guidance get an Internal Revenue Service solution. Go and visit the website right here! <a href="http://www.consumertaxreports.org">http://www.consumertaxreports.org</a> The issue I preferred about the web page was the in-depth record of the national companies and surveys, that offer an vision of each organizations "free consultation."

Suggest removal:

6jrolley325(799 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

so, taking $ from rich companies for the sake of lowering taxes for the rest.....sounds like socialism to me. has that not been your guys' definition of "sharing the weath?"

and this country has been wasting $ on foreign aid long before BO ever took office.

Suggest removal:

7webad(156 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

It seems to me that fracking discussions ought to be focused on people in the Valley committing suicide. Some of you may be ready to meet your maker. If you're not, then look here:
|
v
http://ccrjustice.org/ourcases/curren...

Suggest removal:

8sam_carter(87 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

Did Mr Kasich check with Grover Norquist on this move? I dont think grover would approve...

Suggest removal:

9AlHaberstroh(13 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

Let's get this straight.....Kasich wants to raise taxes on the only segment of business with growth potential..... to give a tax break that probably will never happen, or at best partially over how many decades. So the end result will be higher natural gas prices because only a fool thinks that when business taxes are raised that they don't get passed on to the consumer. A better tax cut would be to get the waste out of Columbus. Also allowing local goverment to require bonding against damages would be a better idea and cheaper in the long run.

Suggest removal:

10Bigben(1996 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

We'll see if they tax the big boys or if this just fades away. I think they should be taxed and no it won't stop them from being extremely rich don't fret.

As far as foreign countries they don't hate us so much as they hate the wealthy internationalists who are invading their countries with our boots on the ground-the same folks who are screwing us with free trade ECT.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport