facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Niles cops vow no tolerance for juvenile crime



Published: Mon, June 18, 2012 @ 12:01 a.m.

photo

Hinton

Staff report

NILES

The Niles Police Department has adopted a zero-tolerance policy for juvenile crime after several incidents in the city in recent months.

Chief Rob Hinton said the incidents have involved property crimes such as vandalism on private and public property.

“It’s juveniles and young adults,” Hinton said, and he added the problem may result from young people staying overnight at another young person’s house. Then, the group goes out late at night and may carry out illegal activities.

“The order has gone out,” Hinton said, to Niles police officers to make arrests and file charges when such incidents occur.

In the past, juveniles have frequently been given a warning for curfew violations or other types of juvenile crime, but the zero-tolerance policy means warnings won’t be given, Hinton said.

“It’s up to the parents to know where their child is at,” Hinton said. Kids seem to be using the “sleeping-over” excuse as a way to get out late at night, so parents need to be vigilant to check up on their kids to make sure they are where they are supposed to be, he said.

Hinton said the department has been hindered this school year by having no school resource officer in the Niles school system. The resource officer was able to pick up on some of the juvenile crime and aid the department in rooting it out, he said.


Comments

1MatthewHouseJD(2 comments)posted 2 years, 6 months ago

Before imposing a policy as sweeping as zero-tolerance, consideration of youth rights and community safety demand of Niles Police Chief Rob Hinton a more thorough investigation and analysis of the root issues.

The juvenile court system has highly prized, since its inception in the United States 113 years ago, the care of the individual. It is inconsistent with that founding mission to make wholesale changes likely to ensnare some innocent teens within a punitive measure that, by definition, strips considerable discretion away from police officers.

Zero-tolerance policies, like all absolute statutes, are flawed because they cannot encompass every possible set of circumstances. However, by their very definition, they lack the corrective mechanisms that most laws include. Zero-tolerance policies provide no latitude for officers to decline to arrest a person the policy was not drafted to target.

The mantra of the first juvenile courts was the dual purpose of seeking the best interests of the child while equally protecting the wellbeing of the community. A few isolated property crimes, cannot justify a deprivation of liberty that will leave citizens no better off. Hinton’s zero-tolerance approach is a solution in search of a problem that will not eradicate the problem he seems to believe his new measures will eliminate.

The chief’s theory – that the problem of juvenile crime may result from young people staying at their peers’ homes without parental supervision – is not conclusive enough to justify such an all-encompassing, unilateral order.

If every law enforcement agency in every jurisdiction in the country funneled such a potentially grand number of status offenses into juvenile court, the system would be hopelessly clogged within weeks. Formal disposition of property crimes and status offenses should be deemphasized, not accentuated.

While I oppose the great majority of the aspects of Hinton’s ill-conceived decision, I salute him for identifying parental involvement as a key component of combating juvenile crime.

I hope the Niles juvenile curfew policy, enforced as Hinton has signaled he will, includes fines for parents who do not supervise their children, followed by jail time for those who continue to neglect their responsibilities.

Where parents fail, police, school staff, and the courts must fill the void. Indeed, the loss of a school resource officer is tragic, because such preventive measures allow law enforcement, schools, and the juvenile court system to be proactive rather than managing the fallout later.

However, if a school’s on-site police officer is to be an effective asset to preventing juvenile crime, the officer must be a resource at the school, not merely a resource to the school. As long as adolescents see a school resource officer as a “mole” – an agent of law enforcement, the courts, or the schools, the trust and rapport to promote positive change will not exist.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes