facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Court consolidation hits snag



Published: Sat, June 9, 2012 @ 12:00 a.m.

By Marc Kovac

news@vindy.com

COLUMBUS

State lawmakers support the idea of consolidating two Trumbull County courts, but some Democrats in the Ohio House aren’t backing provisions to accomplish that task that were added to another bill that passed the Ohio Senate last month.

At issue is whether the new full-time judge of the proposed court should be subject to an election next year or in 2017.

House Bill 433 was approved by the Ohio House last month and focused solely on a court consolidation in Sandusky County.

The Ohio Senate amended the legislation to include comparable language for Trumbull County, abolishing two county courts and replacing them with a new Trumbull County Municipal Court.

The cost-saving move is supported by the county commissioners and county bar association.

“In both counties [Trumbull and Sandusky], the courts in question have annual caseloads which could easily be handled by a single full-time judge,” said Sen. Larry Obhof, a Republican from the Medina area, in urging support for the legislation late last month. “These consolidations will save these counties in the state thousands of dollars in judicial salary alone.”

Under the bill, the two existing part-time judges in Trumbull County — one Republican, one Democrat — would continue to serve until the end of the year, at which time the Republican incumbent would become the lone full-time judge in the new court. The Democratic incumbent is running unopposed in November for common pleas court.

Under HB 433, the new municipal court judge would serve until the end of 2017 and have to seek re-election that year.

But Democratic Reps. Tom Letson, from Warren, and Sean O’Brien, representing the southeastern portion of Trumbull County, introduced separate legislation calling for the court consolidation but requiring an election next year.

“It would require that an election be held for a new Trumbull County Municipal Court in 2013 so that a new judge for the new district could be seated starting Jan. 1, 2014,” Letson said, adding later, “My bill just moves up the time period when the people affected by this consolidation get to have their voice.”

The bills would require an emergency clause so that their provisions would take effect immediately, so Democratic support is needed in the Ohio House for passage.

Lawmakers could act on either bill next week, during what are expected to be their final voting sessions before the summer recess.


Comments

1RightofLeft(41 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

These actions by Letson and O'Brien are reprehensible. Pure politics of the worst possible kind. Their actions will derail cost savings for the county and therefore increase expenses paid for by taxpayers. This all because they want a chance to get rid of another d_mn Republican. You guys and your cronyism poitics make me sick. But I guess that is to be expected - it is Trumbull County.

Suggest removal:

2pat(7 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

Why is Trumbull County on the verge of eliminating uneeded courts while politicians in Mahoning County continue to "consider" and avoid the logical and obvious need for action in Mahoning County for over 30 years? Seems like Trumbull County is always the leader in government action while Mahoning County is the leader in government inaction.

Suggest removal:

3polwatcher(3 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

Letson and O'Brien should be remembered on election day. They are not at all concerned about the cost savings to taxpayers. They have their own agenda, and lets not forget who's pushing that agenda. Trumbull County Dems and especially Polivka and Fuda. They were shamed into passing it in Trumbull County by the citizens and now have found a back door to stop it. Letson is up for reelection in November. It seems pretty clear that Randy Law is the clear choice in this election. But we all need to remember O'Brien, Polivka and Fuda when it's their turn at the ballots. They are suppose to handle the taxpayer dollars and obviously chose their own agenda over us.

Suggest removal:

4YoderDame(4 comments)posted 2 years, 3 months ago

Wait a minute, Letson and O'Brien were against this because they were not satisfied with the cost estimates that Judge Campbell had projected. But now, they are for it as long as the Judge has to run for the seat sooner. Hmmmm, that just doesn't sound quite kosher to me. We need to elect Randy Law to replace Rep. Letson and Pat Paridon to replace Rep.O'Brien.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport