- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

City schools miss targets, lose $1.8M

Published: Fri, July 20, 2012 @ 8:24 p.m.

District aimed for 11% achievement growth, reached only 2%

City schools miss targets, lose $1.8M


The city school district will see its school improvement money slashed more than 50 percent for next year because the schools didn’t meet growth goals.

The federal School Improvement Grant money allotted for University Project Learning Center, Chaney and East totaled $3.3 million. For next year, the amount is reduced to about $1.5 million, said Doug Hiscox, deputy superintendent for academic affairs.

“Each year you have to go through a process for evaluating how well things were done or whether you met targets,” he said.

The reviewers from the Ohio Department of Education were concerned that some things weren’t done in a timely manner.

John Charlton, an ODE spokesman, said a comprehensive review of all 85 SIG buildings in Ohio is ongoing. Districts won’t get final notification of their funding for next year until that is complete, which is expected in late August.

“There were outside providers that should have been in place early in the school year that would have helped with professional development and staff development,” Hiscox said. “They were not actually contracted until November, December or January. There’s also a monitoring system that needs to be used.”

Principals and assistant principals are required to complete a certain number of classroom walk throughs during the school year, and they either weren’t done frequently enough or not done for a significant amount of time, he said.

There were also concerns about the academic progress at East and UPLC, the deputy superintendent said.

“At the beginning of each year you have to submit what the targeted objectives are, and we had not met those,” he said.

The targeted growth in student achievement was 11 percent for both schools, but both saw about 2 percent growth.

“They haven’t reached the level of academic growth that is expected in the evaluator’s eyes for the amount of money that’s been spent,” Hiscox said.

Read more in Saturday’s Vindicator.


1Ytownnative(1118 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

Sounds like we need to up that levy to 20mil and make the taxpayers pick up the tab. Don't worry about that poor planning done by the school system it had to of been G.W. 's fault. I do think if we just keep building new stuff and giving pay raises and watch the student population drop everything will be ok. Aso make sure we keep all the current staff because they are doing such a bangup job.

Suggest removal:

2georgejeanie(1192 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

Sounds like a problem with the bosses, that means the supervisors of the principals are not being tough enough on the principals of these schools. If the principals are not doing what is required of them and walking through the classrooms as required get rid of them. Of course I realize that these teachers must be notified before a principal comes to their class room because of collective bargaining rules. Who would sign a contract that requires a supervisor to notify a teach before a visit? That person should be fired, period. Just another sweetheart deal, probably between a former teacher and the union which represents the present teachers.

Suggest removal:

3Education_Voter(1014 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

What you are saying is not true, georgejeanie.

I guess you will be relieved to know that the "walkthroughs" that principals do are surprise visits.

In any case, a principal can walk into a classroom at any time.

Now, if you are going to have an evaluation meeting with a teacher, it is only polite to schedule the meeting, so that the kids are not observers.

Where were the principals? No doubt dealing with some aggressive and disruptive students and parents.

Or filling out the endless reports required when one gets a grant.

Some principals let the teacher know the day and period an evaluative observation will be done. But since disciplinary concerns and interruptions from Central Office often put them off schedule, they usually just dropped in when they could for my evaluations.

Also, this is important. Youngstown City is being run by an Academic Commission that has been given the ability to void any provision of the Collectively Bargained Agreement that they want to void. They have been using that ability with abandon.

Suggest removal:

4Ytownnative(1118 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

Maybe they need to get someone in charge who will rid of the little thugs

Suggest removal:

5lumper(291 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

teach these monsters target shooting so that they will hit each other with more accuracy, thus solving quite a few problems at once.

Suggest removal:

6mrblue(1159 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

PARENTS., That's where it all starts. They don't care and so the kids don't care. Take a look at how many kids and parents have different last names. What does that tell you? Take a look at the board of education. Do they not set down rules? You cannot simply blame the teachers, especially when no one backs them (the higher ups).Youngstown schools will continue to lose money because NOBODY cares.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2015 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes