- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Speaker: Process will cause ‘crisis’

Published: Tue, January 10, 2012 @ 12:08 a.m.

By Karl Henkel



An Ithaca College professor doesn’t want to see a halt to horizontal fracturing.

She wants to see it banned.

Sandra Steingraber, an ecologist and author, speaking Monday in Virginia at a shale-drilling health forum along with dozens of health- care professionals, environmental advocates and attorneys, said that fracking will not just cause an envi-ronmental crisis, but also a “human-rights crisis.”

The consensus, however, is that the jury is still out; there is not enough information to determine if fracking causes widespread contamination.

“These things should not be causing contamination,” said Dr. Bernard Goldstein of the University of Pittsburgh’s Graduate School of Public Health. “We don’t know if they are, but we need to find out.”

Fracking is the process in which chemical and sand-laced water is blasted into shale rocks thousands of feet below the ground to unlock natural gas and oil.

Vertical fracking has existed for decades, but the advent of horizontal fracking has opened new doors for energy exploration.

It has also left the door open regarding potential water and land contamination and air pollution.

Some question the chemicals that drillers use in the fracking process.

“We don’t have a great handle of toxicology of fracking chemicals,” said Dr. Vikas Kapil of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

In Ohio, drillers do not need to disclose chemicals used in fracking. Wyoming, Pennsylvania, Arkansas, Texas, Colorado, New Mexico, Montana, West Virginia, Idaho, and North Dakota have or are working to approve legislation to require such disclosure.

Wilma Subra, president of Subra Co., an environmental consulting firm, said research identified a laundry list of chemicals found in some drinking water, supposedly due to fracking or subsurface spillage of fracking fluids, including brine.

Substances included methane, nitrate, sulfate and arsenic, but Subra said she does not have data to prove how much of those chemicals were present in the water, leaving some of her peers skeptical.

“The question is the dose,” said Goldstein, who called some of the accusations of widespread public health decay “the extent of ignorance,” because of lack of contextual information. “It’s not just what chemical is in there.”

An example is benzene, which can be present in drinking water in small doses.

Federal regulators have determined that benzene levels of 5 parts per billion or less are safe, so simply listing that chemical and connecting it to fracking is not a fair assessment, Goldstein said.

But many, including Subra and Steingraber, said they’ve already seen enough.

Steingraber urged for the rapid phase-out of all fossil fuels “to avoid human calamity” and said that mitigating fracking will only curb potential environmental risks, but not eliminate them.

“If we mitigate fracking to kill fewer people, we’re still killing people,” she said.

Steingraber used Dimock, Pa. as an example of fracking gone awry.

Some residents of Dimock, a small township in Northeast Pennsylvania, had their drinking water contaminated with high levels of methane after Cabot Oil & Gas began fracking in the area in 2008.

Cabot shipped clean water to 12 homes for about three years before the Environmental Protection Agency deemed the water safe last November.

The EPA has since said it will retest the drinking water.

But Energy In Depth, an education and outreach arm of the natural gas and oil industry, points to the Fort Worth, Texas region as an example of drilling done right.

The Fort Worth area, which is in the Barnett Shale region, had 15,675 producing wells as of last January. According to Community Health Status Indicators compiled by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, key indicators of health actually improved during the past several years.


1James_S(268 comments)posted 4 years, 5 months ago

The hammer has now been slammed upon the people of Dimock, Pennsylvania.
The Executive Branch of our ZOG, of which the EPA is part of, has decided to do this to them without congressional consent.
You're right.. not only is it our future, but it is the future of the entire country as well- especially if we continue producing/electing politicians who refuse to stand up against their masters who own them.
Thanks for the heads-up...

Suggest removal:

2Bigben(1996 comments)posted 4 years, 5 months ago

I'm thinking about selling rubber homes - interested ?

Suggest removal:

3gwscience1(7 comments)posted 4 years, 5 months ago

What's the definition for "inducing panic"? This one is a collection of all the "antis" in one thick lozenge. Commenter Subra in the article is trying to link "methane, nitrate, sulfate and arsenic" to drilling and hydrofracturing activities? Sorry folks, but arsenic and sulfate are common in some ground water, and methane is natural as well, all over big sections of OH and PA. PA lacks water well construction standards, and even with good standards, nitrate can get to ground water from the surface. We do public well water testing, and toluene and benzene in the atmosphere makes it very difficult to reach "zero" in samples. Some of these people feed the uninformed just enough to frighten. That's just irresponsible, and then casts doubt on reasonable voices for caution in this gold rush.

Suggest removal:

4southsidedave(5189 comments)posted 4 years, 5 months ago

Unfortunately, profits will most likely win over the safety of people...stay tuned.

Suggest removal:

5AirQualityTexas(1 comment)posted 4 years, 5 months ago

You folks better pray for global warming since you will not have fuel to heat your homes.... However if you are successful at your endeavors you won't have that either....

Suggest removal:

6Bigben(1996 comments)posted 4 years, 5 months ago

AirQuality Texas "you will not have fuel to heat your homes.... " - - - -Why is all the natural gas going to China?

Suggest removal:

7Bigben(1996 comments)posted 4 years, 5 months ago

gwscience - - -What's the definition for "inducing panic"? - - - - - - - -- -How about causing an earthquake with an explosion?

Suggest removal:

8Fishinsolitude(2 comments)posted 4 years, 5 months ago

It doesn't take a college professor to understand what's the correct thing to do.
Ban all fracking nationwide!

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes