facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

YSU union attorney objects to comment



Published: Thu, February 23, 2012 @ 12:01 a.m.

By Denise Dick

denise_dick@vindy.com

Youngstown

The attorney for the Association of Classified Employees at Youngstown State University objects to a former prosecutor’s contention that the union didn’t cooperate in the criminal investigation of its former treasurer.

“It is one of the most absurd comments I’ve ever heard,” said Atty. Ira Mirkin, who represents ACE.

He was responding to comments made by Atty. Robert E. Bush Jr., a former Mahoning County assistant prosecutor, published in The Vindicator Wednesday regarding a plea agreement negotiated by Carol Hovanes.

Hovanes, the former ACE treasurer, pleaded guilty Tuesday in Mahoning County Common Pleas Court to a misdemeanor theft charge. She had been accused of taking money from union accounts. Her sentencing is March 29.

“We contacted them because the union wanted to pursue criminal charges against Ms. Hovanes,” Mirkin said.

In the article published Wednesday, Bush said that ACE didn’t cooperate with the investigation, provide documents or witnesses.

Mirkin said that he personally delivered to Bush boxes of documents in July 2010 containing about 4,000 documents.

Included in those documents was the audit the union had conducted, documenting the missing funds, he said.

Mirkin said that he notified Bush that the union would object to a plea agreement that didn’t include restitution and had asked to be notified of court proceedings in the case.

The plea didn’t include restitution and Mirkin said he wasn’t notified of Tuesday’s court date.

Bush said that Hovanes admitted she had taken about $13,000 and she had repaid about $9,900 of that.

The documentation provided by Mirkin in July dealt with Hovanes, who had already acknowledged what she had taken.

“We wanted documentation related to some other case,” Bush said, declining to be specific.

When investigators from the prosecutor’s office contacted ACE union leadership in March 2010 and June 2010, including a former president, vice president and treasurer, they declined to talk about the case.

A vice president said he couldn’t get any of the documents supporting the theft allegations, a treasurer said she would need the president’s permission to talk about the missing money and the former union president told investigators he believed the Ohio Education Association should be consulted before he discussed the issue, Bush said.

“They were covering, now they want to say something different,” he said.

“No matter what they say, the leadership was not cooperating.”


Comments

1crlbk1052(99 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

Mr. Bush is wrong when he states that, "A vice president said he couldn't get any of the documents"....the vice president at that time was a woman, who has since retired from her position at the university and was NOT re-elected to any positions for the union.

I wonder what fishing expedition he was on when he said, "We wanted documentation related to some other case, declining to be specific."

Amazing how the crime town political machine works here. This woman had Jay Macejko's wife as her attorney when she filed bankruptcy, is this why she is getting such a break? If you look at other cases where money is stolen, those people lose their jobs AND go to jail. This person cut a pretty sweet deal with the Macejko's and Bush. She gets probation for stealing over $13,000.00?

Oh, by the way, she 'raises' money for the Relay for Life that is held every year at YSU while still holding her current position, which is in the collections dept.....I wonder if any money is involved there?

Suggest removal:

2dancinmoses(66 comments)posted 2 years, 5 months ago

Let me get this straight, Bush didn't like the documents he received because they were NOT what he was looking for? What then was he looking for?

Seems to me that all the other cases relating to stealing funds reported in this paper show the thief gets jail time, loses their job AND has probation, why not in this case?

A sweetheart of a deal was cut here, WHY? what makes this case so special? Just who is connected to who? Why isn't someone investigating this deal AND REPORTING on these back door deals?

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport