- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Candidates defend their backgrounds

Published: Thu, February 23, 2012 @ 12:07 a.m.

gains, macejko take each other to task over cases


Mahoning County prosecutor candidate Jay Macejko, left, and incumbent Paul Gains meet before the start of Wednesday’s debate on 21 WFMJ-TV.

By Peter H. Milliken



Mahoning County Prosecutor Paul J. Gains and his challenger, city Prosecutor Jay Macejko, touted their credentials and traded barbs in a live, one-hour televised debate.

The debate was Wednesday evening on 21 WFMJ-TV, less than two weeks before the March 6 Democratic primary, in which Macejko seeks to oust Gains from office.

Gains, county prosecutor since 1997, is seeking a fifth consecutive four-year term in the $105,703-a-year job.

“Crime is down. Convictions are up. Prison commitments are up. We are a safer community than when I took office,” Gains said.

He cited the decline in Youngstown homi-cides from 62 in 1996 to 23 last year and a simultaneous drop in felonious assaults from more than 1,200 a year to fewer than 300.

“Nobody’s going to question my integrity,” Gains said, adding that he has given the county prosecutor’s office 15 years of scandal-free leadership, with no lawsuits alleging discrimination and retaliation having been filed against him.

Gains cited his experience as a criminal defense lawyer and prosecutor, in supervising a staff of 42 in the county prosecutor’s office, and in defending the county from civil lawsuits.

In contrast, Gains said Macejko, who has been city prosecutor for six years, lacks civil-law experience and supervises only six employees, two of whom have sued him.

Macejko said that if he’s elected, he’d enter the office with 14 years of experience as a prosecutor, compared to zero for Gains when Gains became county prosecutor.

“There’s a reason that people feel unsafe. It’s because we need better performance from the prosecutor’s office,” Macejko said. “We need to bring victims and their rights into the forefront. We need to support the good efforts of law enforcement.”

Macejko criticized Gains for giving his staff pay increases while deputy sheriffs are on layoff and parts of the county jail remain closed, but Gains said he did it within his budget and with the goal of reducing staff turnover.

Macejko repeated his assertion that he’s never discriminated against anyone. Bassil Ally, the assistant city prosecutor who filed a successful federal religious discrimination lawsuit against Macejko and the city, is “permitted to worship as he chooses on city time,” Macejko said.

Gains said, however, the city confessed a $100,000 judgment in the Ally case, and Gains cited a recent written finding by a federal judge that Ally was a victim of religious discrimination and retaliation.

Gains said he believes recent text messages between Macejko and Bret Hartup, an assistant city prosecutor, including a derogatory text message about President Barack Obama “are authentic.”

He added: “No prosecutor should condone any type of racism or other bigotry. No prosecutor should accept that type of conduct.”

Macejko, who has denied sending the Obama text, countered: “It’s something that, if we were able to authenticate it, that I would have dealt with as a supervisor. However, the reality is that these were on private phones and there’s no way of authenticating” the text messages.

Gains and Macejko also clashed concerning Lexter Williams, the armed home invader who fled to Philadelphia after his bond was reduced to zero and was captured there.

Gains said his office made a plea bargain in which Williams would serve a 13-year prison term and be released to house arrest pending his sentencing after the victims had moved to Texas and were “extremely reluctant” to return here to testify against him in a trial.

But Macejko said the victims were not notified Williams would be released and were willing to return here to testify.

“That little vacation cost him 67 years,” Gains said of Williams. Gains said Williams was sentenced to 80 years in prison after his capture. The actual sentence was 831/2 years.

U.S. District Judge Christopher A. Boyko ruled earlier Wednesday that Atty. Scott Cochran, lawyer for the Islamic Society of Greater Youngstown, should not have released any case documents to The Vindicator, before filing them with the court, with the court-ordered redactions of Social Security numbers and medical information.

Cochran, a Gains supporter, sought to unseal all court documents in the discrimination lawsuit by Ally against Macejko and the city. Cochran released to the paper the text messages between Macejko and Hartup that included the derogatory reference to Obama.


1BIGDOG69(27 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

Could it be that the homicide rate has dropped and the felony rate has dropped because they are pleading homicides down to a lesser crime and pleading felonies down to misdemeanors so that their stats for convictions look so much better?

Suggest removal:

2WC(8 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

I watched the debate and was curious about Attorney Macejko's characterization of his treatment of Attorney Ally as "bumping"heads...as happens in all offices when people work together. Attorney Ally was awarded $110,000 ..thats quite a bump on the head. Attorney Macejko is either in denial or can no longer recognize the truth.

Suggest removal:

3walter_sobchak(2418 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

Even if they plead a first degree murder charge down to a manslaughter charge, is the victim any less dead? So, if all homicides in Y-town are reduced, then the murder rate is zero?

My God, the voters are idiots!

Suggest removal:

4palbubba(746 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

The one thing we do know for sure is that Gains has done a terrible job. Thumbing his nose at tax payers with his raises to his staff, constantly pleaing cases down to nothing and constantly letting criminals back on the street with probations, paroles and lack of sufficient bail. You have the chance to change this in the election. Question is, will you or will the same old party hacks get their way and get this incompetent person reelected?

Suggest removal:

5praxis95(51 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

An allegation of racism has arisen in the prosecutor’s race based on a text critical of the president’s stimulus in 2009. The allegation was leaved without any examination of the content of the text. Before one can say the author of the text is a racist or had a racist motivation you have to ask have I inferred what the author implied. The author of the text was mocking the presidents stimulus package and clearly skeptical that the stimulus would have the economic impact claimed by the president. The author of the text stated that the value of the stimulus was worth very little, 3 pieces of fried chicken some cool aid and a dime bag. To claim with certainty that the text is racist one must be certain that the items available for purchase by the stimulus are purchased only blacks or synonymous with the black community. This requires three assumptions’; first that non blacks do not like fried chicken, Second, non-blacks do not drink cool-aid, and Third that non-blacks do not smoke the content of a dime bag. I would submit that the life experiences of us all clearly establish that those assumptions are false. SO since the author of the text did not include an item synonymous with or exclusive to the black community, I ask you who’s the racist the author or the text or the person hoping to benefit by the accusation of racism?

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2015 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes