facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

A reading ‘guarantee’ is fundamental to success



Published: Sun, December 30, 2012 @ 12:00 a.m.

Running a school district is a complicated job, one made no easier by the financial pressures of the day, and often by external forces, such as poverty or parental indifference.

And almost every aspect of education is more difficult in the Youngstown City School District, which has struggled with fiscal and academic emergencies, as well as declining enrollment and competition from charter schools and vouchers. Often those charter schools siphon students and income from the city school district without providing a higher quality of education and with less state oversight.

Be all of that as it may, there are some basic things that every school must do if it has any chance of success, and chief among them is teaching its students to read.

Some years ago, a literacy program adopted the slogan “Reading is Fundamental,” with the accent on fun. It was clever, but more than that, it was literally true. Literacy is the foundation of any learning.

And so we are happy to see that the Youngs-town Board of Education has adopted a policy that will help facilitate a “third grade reading guarantee,” in keeping with a law signed by Gov. John Kasich in July.

A bad precedent

This is not the first time such a reading guarantee has been tried in Ohio. Former Gov. Bob Taft promoted a requirement that all fourth-grade students be able to pass the reading portion of the Ohio Proficiency Test at the beginning of the 2001-2002 school year. If not, they could not advance to the next grade level. This was stated well in advance, so that every school board, principal and teacher knew that the kindergarten student of 1997 was going to have to be able to read at a fourth grade level by 2001.

And yet, when the deadline came, so many thousands of students had been allowed to fall behind that the standard was abandoned.

Youngstown’s plan calls for tests at the beginning of each year, parental notification and remedial action when a student is not on track to meet the standard by third grade.

Every teacher and every student knows that “cramming” for a test doesn’t work. Learning is a gradual and constant process, and it involves the teacher, student and parents to be successful. Principals are responsible for monitoring the success of teachers, and if they don’t the superintendent must hold them to account.

About 20 years ago, a grand plan was announced in Youngstown that called for 100 percent of Youngstown’s students to graduate by 2000. This paper was criticized for stating editorially that goal was unrealistic, but we believed it was, and history has shown it was.

This goal, however — that every primary student be taught to read — is doable because it is focused, and it is designed to identify deficiencies and take early corrective action.

There are few guarantees in life, but a guarantee that a child who comes to school each day will be taught to read should be one of them.


Comments

1TB(1167 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

So what happens if they dont?

Suggest removal:

2kurtw(938 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

The real problem with public education in the U.S. is monopoly control- i.e. The Teachers Union. Parents- who should be entitled to oversee the education of their offspring- are left out of the loop- even though they pay for what is being done to their children without their consent.

The only sensible approach is some sort of voucher program- which allows individual choice. Sending kids into a school system dominated by union "apparatchiks" is a recipe for failure.

Why are we 25th or 30th among industrialized societies in Math and Science even though we spend the most per capita? The countries leading the pack- Finland, Scandinavia, etc. do not, as far as I know, have teachers unions. They have Civil Servants committed to educating young people. There's the difference.

Suggest removal:

3TB(1167 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

You don't know much then. Scandinavia has highly unionized workforces.

Whenever there is a guarantee regarding humanity, it is most likely destined for failure. As pointed out above, holding every individual accountable to an arbitrary standard is usually a recipe for failure.

When the state experiences 0% unemployment, 0% crime, etc., then I'll sign on for societal guarantees.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes