- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Which will Kasich choose: Pay for roads the old-fashioned way, or raid turnpike’s coffers

Published: Wed, December 5, 2012 @ 12:00 a.m.

We’re on pins and needles wait- ing to see if Gov. John Kasich leaves the Ohio Turnpike to do what it has been doing so well for almost 60 years or whether he fundamentally changes one of America’s first superhighways into a cash cow. Actually, we’re just kidding about the pins and needles part. For as much as Kasich tries to maintain some aura of suspense about what he is going to do, his intentions are clear.

He doesn’t see the turnpike as a functioning engine of prosperity for the state’s northern tier. He sees it as an under-utilized asset that he can convert into quick cash. He can then spread the money around the state the way a sovereign hands out the spoils of war to his favorite vassals.

And this old fashioned political wheeling and dealing will be passed off to the gullible as conservative governance.

Even while he repeatedly says that the results of a $3.5 million study on the turnpike’s future that he commissioned won’t be released until the end of the month, Kasich appeared before the Ohio Contractors Association with a clear message. At one point he urged the contractors to “keep an open mind,” but virtually everything else he said made it clear that all he’s open to is cashing in the turnpike’s chips. The only thing the KPMG study is going to provide is one or more means toward that end.

“Why would we have an asset in our state that is under utilized, where value could be captured from that asset and it can be used to generate jobs and also the ability to do the infrastructure needs that we have in a state that’s within 600 miles of 60 percent of the country?” Kasich asked the contractors.

Why stop at the ’pike?

Frankly, the state has a lot of assets other than the turnpike that could be viewed in the same light. It has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in prisons that could be sold off to private investors. Oh, wait, Kasich already tried that with something well less than resounding success. But the state has thousands of acres of public land that it could sell. It has billions of dollars worth of universities. It has valuable real estate in downtown Columbus. Why not sell the Statehouse to a private investor and then pay rent? And what about the governor’s mansion that Kasich couldn’t be bothered to live in? The question almost answers itself. And then there’s the state’s real money maker, the Ohio Lottery. We bet Las Vegas gambling mogul Sheldon Adelson would be delighted to take that off the state’s hands.

Why, the under-utilized, under-capitalized assets of the state are legion.

Everybody knows that private companies can do things so much better than government — with the possible exception of that prison deal. Oh, and Indiana, where the state leased its turnpike to a consortium of foreign investors. In six years, tolls for cars have doubled and those for trucks have increased 2.5 times. Meanwhile, the state has already run through the lion’s share of the $3.8 billion it received in a 75-year lease deal. And while the outgoing governor basked in the glory of building new roads, the incoming governor will have to find the money to maintain them.

It isn’t free money

But whatever other arguments can be made for or against leasing or even further mortgaging the Ohio Turnpike, we believe one of the strongest is a decidedly old-fashioned one: the moral argument. The Ohio Turnpike was established as an independent entity that was supposed to pay its own way, and it has. The taxpayers of Ohio did not pay for the turnpike, the users did. Many of them are Ohioans, many aren’t. Appropriating an asset that was built by tolls paid over 57 years and using that money for the aggrandizement of the governor is wrong.

The turnpike commission has done Ohio proud. The turnpike has done and is doing what it was designed to do.

If Kasich is successful in leasing the turnpike, look for him and his successors to sell off other state assets in the name of smart monetization — until there’s little left to put on the block, or until the public realizes that selling the seed corn is a rotten idea.


1NoBS(2832 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Just one more reason why Kasich isn't the right man for the job. Anybody see any parallels between Lehman Bros. and the state of Ohio?

Suggest removal:

2GoPens(397 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

If Kasich follows through with the plan to lease or " giveaway" the Turnpike, then recall procedures should begin immediately.

Suggest removal:

3borylie(951 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Vindicator says: He can then spread the money around the state the way a sovereign hands out the spoils of war to his favorite vassals. Is this what President Obama did with the stimulus monies?

Suggest removal:

4chuck_carney(499 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Not a word from the Vindy editorial board that former Gov. Stricland raided the tobacco fund to balance the budget. So it's OK for a Democrat elected official to use creative financing but not the opposition.

Selective memory at its best.

Suggest removal:

5NoBS(2832 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Chuck, "raiding" an established fund is hardly the same thing as selling, long-term leasing, or otherwise depriving the state of the income derived from the everyday operations of the Turnpike.

Maybe what Kasich really aspires to is a seat on the board of Bain Capital.

Suggest removal:

6dennismangan(14 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

I don't often enter these discussions, but when I notice someone just making stuff up ... The Vindicator criticized Strickland more than once for securitization of the tobacco fund. In one of those, June 10, 2007, we even used a phrase, "robbing Peter to pay Paul," which we have used in discussing Kasich's plan for the turnpike.

Suggest removal:

7Towmater(2 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

In attempting to make the "moral" argument for protecting the cesspool of corruption known as the Ohio Turnpike, the Vindy conveniently forgets that the people of Ohio were promised in the 1950s that once the original bonds to build the Turnpike were paid off, the tolls would be removed and the road would revert to the state of Ohio. The corrupt Turnpike Commission and its equally corrupt counterparts in Columbus broke that promise. This road should have been under the jurisdiction of ODOT a long time ago, which is where it belongs.

Suggest removal:

8GoPens(397 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Oops Chuck! You've been busted! How many of your other posts are made up garbage as well?

Suggest removal:

9DSquared(1788 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

"Corrupt Turnpike Commission" indeed! May as well have the mob run the thing.

Suggest removal:

10rickking123(331 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

At least on the turnpike you have a good chance of seeing a snow plow when its snowing, whereas you can dream on about seeing one on 680 when its snowing.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes