- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Assisted-living facilities lack ability to be fined

Published: Tue, December 4, 2012 @ 12:09 a.m.

An in-depth look at Ohio’s nursing homes




The alarms meant to protect Eva Gorosics were quiet the night of April 9, when the 84-year-old Alzheimers patient walked out of Grace Woods Senior Living in Niles, into the cold, and to her death.

Grace was understaffed and undersecured that night, a state Department of Health probe would eventually find. But it couldn’t levy fines or criminally charge the limited liability company.

The wrong that could be pursued was against the only person on staff that night, who was assigned to watch 33 residents. Niles city police charged care assistant Andrea Clark, 27, with patient neglect. She faces up to 90 days in jail and fines up to $750. Grace Woods remains open and was never sanctioned. That charges could only be brought against one staffer surprised Terry Swauger, Niles city prosecutor.

“This was someone’s parent, grandparent, great-grandparent … this is a loss of a family member which could have been prevented and I was a little shocked to find out that that’s the highest level offense there is for this type of action,” he said.

If Grace Woods were a federally certified nursing home receiving Medicare dollars, funds could have been cut to act as a fine for the safety violations. However, assisted-living facilities, which are mostly privately funded, don’t face the same penalties.

“There’s really not any kind of strong enough repercussions, particularly in assisted living facilities,” said state Sen. Capri Cafaro of Liberty, D-32nd. “You either get a slap on the wrist or shut down completely.”

Cafaro hopes to introduce legislation in the next session of the Ohio General Assembly that would allow the Department of Health to fine assisted-living facilities.

If such a law were in place earlier, she said, regulators could have held Grace Woods accountable for the death of Gorosics.

Between 2:30 and 6 a.m. April 9, Gorosics walked out of her room, wearing only a nightshirt and disposable underwear. Clark was the only caregiver on duty for that shift and was in charge of all 33 residents.

At the end of a hallway, a passcode and an alarmed door guarded a physical therapy room and an exit, but Gorosics had learned that if she pushed the door for 15 seconds, it would open anyway, officials said.

This wasn’t the first time Gorosics left the building. The Gorosics family would not comment for this story.

Four months earlier, she walked through a similarly secured door on the other side of the building. That time, Clark heard an alarm and led her back into the facility.

But the alarm system Gorosics breached the morning she died was found by Department of Health investigator Walt Bradley to have a “mechanical deficiency.”

According to his final report on the incident, a motion sensor in the therapy room was set to turn off the alarm when approached from that side.

It allowed staff to enter that wing of the building through the therapy room without having to punch in the passcode.

The device was 12 inches too close to the entryway. So after Gorosics pushed for 15 seconds, the door swung into the room and across the sensor, killing the alarm until it was reset hours later.

Clark was supposed to check on Gorosics and three other residents every half-hour because they were considered “at risk for elopement,” according to Bradley’s report. All had either attempted or succeeded in leaving the facility. Just a week earlier, a woman had climbed out of her bedroom window. The staff was not aware she was missing until she was returned unharmed by police.

Clark told police that she didn’t realize Gorosics was missing until 6 a.m., although she had already logged that Gorosics was in her room from 2 to 7 a.m. in the visual check log.

Also, Clark told police she had last seen Gorosics at 4 a.m., however, she told Bradley it was at 2:30 a.m.

Clark told Bradley she was cleaning, doing laundry and waking up other residents while Gorosics went unsupervised.

“She stated she always worked the third shift by herself and the last five months have been busier,” according to Bradley’s report. “She told the administrator that there were too many people to watch and do the work.”

It’s unknown at what time Gorosics disabled the alarm and walked through the secure areas of the facility into the frigid air of early spring.

Two staff members discovered Gorosics’ body about 6:45 a.m.

Bradley wrote in his report that the faulty alarm system and inadequate staffing created a “real and present danger” that jeopardized the residents’ lives.

The Ohio Department of Health could have closed the facility and relocated its residents. However, Bradley chose a more common option. He requested a plan of correction and scheduled a follow-up visit for a month later. A facility has 23 days to comply or face revocation of its license.

Out of 12 “real and present danger” incidents since 2008, the department proposed seven license revocations, only two of which were actually revoked. One of these was the House of Hope in Youngstown, which was closed in September 2011. That closing came upon public outcry and media scrutiny after a resident was found dead in November 2010 in one of the home’s bathrooms. Despite attempts by the state to close the facility in early 2009, the home remained open.

“It’s not something we do every day,” said Tess “Tessie” Pollock, a representative for the state Department of Health. “The main goal is to bring a facility into compliance.”

Pollock said the department doesn’t generally shut down a facility unless there is a “pattern of serious violations.”

Inspection reports dating to 2009 reveal that Grace Woods had been cited for 13 violations related to patient safety, including inadequate staff, untrained staff, unsecured entrances and allowing unlicensed individuals to administer medications.

In July 2011, personnel failed to notify the staff physician that a resident became lethargic and disoriented. During that time, the patient fell and fractured her hip. She wasn’t taken to the emergency room for two days.

Edward Fabian, owner and administrator of Grace Woods, declined to comment.

Like all prior violations, Fabian complied with safety regulations in a timely manner.

The night after Gorosics died, Fabian scheduled an extra residential-care assistant to the overnight shift. The following day, he installed a new alarm system.

By April 13, when Bradley filed citations against Grace Woods, “real and present danger was abated,” and the facility was already in the clear.

John Saulitis, regional director of the Long-term Care Ombudsman Program for the Department of Aging, said the state has limited power to enforce regulations for assisted-living facilities.

“There’s not a lot. I mean they’re not anywhere near compared to nursing home regulations. Partly that is because of the presumption of independence,” he said.

Assisted-living facilities vary in the services they provide to their patients. Some serve people who need relatively little assistance. Others so closely resemble nursing homes that — in terms of the functions they serve — the difference amounts to little more than a framed certification from the Ohio Department of Health’s Bureau of Long-term Care.

That piece of paper can mean a lot regarding the consequences of a code violation.

Assisted-living facilities and nursing homes are both licensed by the bureau. But nursing homes get certified, giving them access to Medicare dollars.

Most assisted-living facilities in Ohio are private pay and, unlike Medicare, which can withhold funding to encourage higher quality, the Department of Health can only revoke a facility’s license.

Saulitis said that without monetary penalties, correction becomes reactive. Violations affect the bottom line for federally funded nursing homes, but not so for assisted-living facilities.

“In the assisted-living world, there is either no penalty, or the death penalty,” Saulitis said.

Saulitis is working with Cafaro and the Ohio Department of Aging on research for a law that would allow the Department of Health to fine assisted- living facilities.

“Fines or monetary penalties are oftentimes used as penalties for violations of laws and rules,” Saulitis said. “If there were no financial penalties, I’d drive 85 mph everyday on every street.”

Cafaro plans to introduce a bill toward the beginning of the Ohio General Assembly’s next session. She can’t help Gorosics, but Cafaro said she hopes more oversight will prevent other needless deaths.

“Anytime you’re dealing with a vulnerable population, it’s important to make sure everyone is appropriately monitored,” Cafaro said.

Rose Bonilla contributed to this story.

TheNewsOutlet.org is a collaborative effort among the Youngstown State University journalism program, Kent State University, University of Akron and professional media outlets including, WYSU-FM Radio and The Vindicator, The Beacon Journal and Rubber City Radio, both of Akron.


1Crazygal(6 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Most definitely get those rules changed, so hard to believe a worker faces trouble and not the facility. She was wrong marking she was in bed, they were wrong for not heeding her pleas for another worker. These things can be prevented, that's what makes it so hard.

Suggest removal:

2whitesabbath(738 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

They may lack ability to be fined but you can bet your arse they can be held responsible in a civil suit.

Suggest removal:

3endthismess(464 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

The facility is CLEARLY at fault, not the worker! When they knew this resident was a flight risk, she should have been move onto another location. This place is still clearly a dump, lacking in proper monitering equipment. The stinking cheap owner should be held entirely responsible and this hell hole of a bat cave should be fined and then shut down! STOP BLAMING THE EMPLOYEES FOR CHEAP MANAGEMENT BLUNDERS. You own, YOU take the blame cheapo.

Suggest removal:

476Ytown(1367 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Are you kidding me? A 27 year old care assistant on staff responsible for 33 persons and they are going to charge her with patient neglect? Up to 90 days in jail and fines up to $750. They've arrested the wrong person. The administrator of this facility is the one who is neglectful. not the 27 year old care assistant! She was busier than a one-legged man in an a$$ kicking contest.

Suggest removal:

5whitesabbath(738 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

What are you ranting about endthismess ? Being at fault is one thing , Not collecting Federal Monies through Medicare is the reason for not being able to fine the company, it does not leave them free from litigation. This is more then likely the reason for no comment from the children of the diseased. Please read the article....

Suggest removal:

6laddjd(15 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

This facility is not a dump nor are the staff members and owners uncaring, my grandmother has been a resident of Gracewoods for over 20 years, the care she receives there is above board and those employees treat her like they are also her grandchildren. The facility was at fault for the violations and have made many changes but I stand behind the quality of care that my grandmother receives this is her home and she would not want to leave it.

Suggest removal:

7HappyBob(360 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

A couple of comments:
1) Readers need to understand what the difference is between an assisted care facility and a skilled care facility (so called "nursing home). Furthermore, while many residents in assisted care are mentally competent and ony need help with phyical activities of daily life, an increasingly significant population of impaired and have little understanding why they "elope" or wander off. Imagine what it might be like to awake in terror in a strange bed, surrounded by unknown people, in a facility you don't recognize, and being held "captive" for some reason you don't understand. These residents need a better support system than a caretaker ratio of 1:33 and an alarm system.
2) The article appears to reinforce the notion that these facilities are poorly regulated and where regulations do exist, the enforcement of regulations is ineffective. I have a hard time reconciling that with all the claims that our government is over regulating business.

Suggest removal:

8Christincharge(1 comment)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

I would like to reference two quotes from this article. Quote one: “84-year-old Alzheimers patient.” Quote two: “At the end of a hallway, a passcode and an alarmed door guarded a physical therapy room and an exit, but Gorosics had learned that if she pushed the door for 15 seconds, it would open.”

WOW, and here I thought that Alzheimer’s patients had trouble remembering things…so either she was faking Alzheimer’s OR the investigators got their story wrong. I have visited the Gracewoods facility on several occasions. The physical therapy room they are referring to is at the end of a long hallway. BUT they neglected to mention that to get outside from the physical therapy room, she would have had to walk up an inclined ramp (in the dark), get through another locked door (in the dark), walk down another short hallway (in the dark), and then finally get through ANOTHER locked door. Are you telling me that three “locked” doors couldn’t stop an 84 year old woman who was suffering from Alzheimer’s! Did the police even bother to investigate this incident or are they just making stuff up?

This is strictly my opinion, but what most likely happened is she walked right out of the front door. I know for a fact that if you pushed on the front door long enough, it would just open. The one and only caregiver on duty may have been assisting another patient or tending to her other duties. The door automatically closes and at the time there wasn't even have a buzzer on it, so how was the one and only caregiver supposed to know anything had happened. If you ask me, the owners of Gracewoods should be held responsible for this tragedy. Why aren’t they facing jail time and fines? If you set someone up to fail and they end up failing, whose fault is it?

This was a terrible tragedy that happened to this poor woman. My thoughts and prayers go out to her family. My hope is that they family is able to sue Gracewoods and get the facility closed. Places like Gracewoods don’t deserve to be in business!

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes