- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -


« News Home

Ohio colleges, universities unite on proposed changes to policies

Published: Sat, December 1, 2012 @ 12:06 a.m.

By Marc Kovac



Student graduation rates would have greater weight when determining state funding for Ohio’s public colleges and universities, under a first-of-its-kind framework unveiled by Gov. John Kasich’s administration.

The proposed policy changes were developed by a group of university and college presidents, headed by Ohio State University’s Gordon Gee and Zane State College’s Paul Brown, after Kasich asked the various campuses to work together for the common good.

“There is no one else in this country doing what we’re doing right now,” Gee said, adding later, “There was collective sacrifice for the common good.”

Brown added, “We’re doing this in a way that’s going to set the bar for the rest of the country.”

Friday’s report marked the second time under Kasich’s administration that the state’s higher- education institutions have worked together on budget matters. Earlier, they met and agreed on construction projects to be funded under the state’s capital budget, with some campuses stepping aside to ensure the completion of needed building improvements at others.

That’s a change from past practice, when colleges and universities would compete for funding.

“We were very jingoistic; it was about us individually,” Gee said. “Fast forward to where we are and around this table today. ... We collectively have made a historic decision.”

There aren’t any dollar totals attached to the plan. The governor will release his proposal for college and university funding during next year’s budget cycle. Some of the group’s suggestions will require lawmaker action to implement.

But the plan provides a framework for determining how the administration and colleges and universities will approach budget issues moving forward.

Among other suggestions, the plan:

Calls for half of the state’s funding for higher education to be based on student graduation, up from the current 20 percent, plus a shift away from funding based on enrollment.

Provides benefits to campuses that enroll out-of-state students and keep them in Ohio after they complete degree programs and to those that enroll at-risk students.

Allows students to transfer course credits among the state’s public colleges and universities, meaning students could take classes at a community college, then transfer to a four-year campus to complete a degree.

Cynthia E. Anderson, president of Youngstown State University, said the plan was a long time coming and much needed.

“I have long been opposed to being evaluated on the number of students coming in the door,” she said. “I think that universities should be evaluated on what they’re doing with thestudents who choose to come through their doors and the output that they are giving. This is a first step in that.”

Anderson added that increased efforts to link colleges and universities with technical schools and primary and secondary education ultimately would benefit Youngstown and other communities.

“There are plenty of students to go around for everyone,” Anderson said. “It’s our responsibility to find those individuals, figure out what it is their dreams and aspirations are and get them to the right institutions where they can follow those dreams and aspirations.”


1ytownsteelman(680 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

This is absolutely backwards! A student still uses university resources whether or not he or she graduates. Who pays for the students who enroll and then drop out?

Suggest removal:

2redeye1(5661 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

@yman They have to repaid their school loans themself, not the school's problem!

Suggest removal:

3Spiderlegs(161 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

The details are very vague, and the individuals who drew them up themselves don't seem to know what the outcome will be. We have to wait until we see the numbers.

Part of my concern is how we count completion. The usual standard in higher education is completion within six years. YSU full-time student graduation rates are nearly as good as the elite colleges in Ohio, but the overall numbers are low because of the large part-time population, many who graduate but take more than six years. Some features of the new plan, like attention more attention to STEM and out-of-state students, could actually benefit YSU in the long-run because these reflects the direction that the university is moving. There will definitely be schools hurt worse than YSU by this.

Some of the concern about transition goes away if YSU can raise tuition at a rate greater than 3.5%. YSU held its tuition down for several years, and contrary to the stories we read in the Vindy (which clearly hates YSU), YSU is still one of the lowest tuition rates for a four-year campus in Ohio.

Here's the report: https://www.ohiohighered.org/sites/oh...

Suggest removal:

4Tigerlily(509 comments)posted 3 years, 7 months ago

Yes, ytownsteelman, exactly!

Who is going to pay for the student who goes to college for two years and then drops out?

Not the student. Not the taxpayer. Guess who?

The faculty, staff, and everyone else the universities send up the river in their next contract "negotiations".

This is just another Kasich money grab wrapped up to look like a present.

Sacrifice. Gordon Gee of Ohio State is a sham.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes