facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Ryan plan attacks middle class



Published: Mon, August 20, 2012 @ 12:00 a.m.

Ryan plan attacks middle class

Mitt Romney has picked an extreme, radical V.P. running mate. If you haven’t heard of Paul Ryan and his budget, you better check it out.

The Paul Ryan budget proposes the elimination of Medicare as we know it. It will no longer be a fee for service, at a negotiated low rate. Contrary to what R&R are saying, the $700 billion in cuts to Medicare were for “non-essential.” These are administrative cuts that affects insurance and drug companies, not plan recipients.

The Ryan Plan has always had the same cuts, but it pays for the tax cuts (partially) of the very wealthy. It would be rolling the dice to change Medicare to a voucher/coupon plan.

Social Security would be privatized. That’s what we need to do, turn over the fund to Wall Street. It would cost $2 trillion to move the plan to the private sector. Ryan does not address this cost.

“Simplification” of the tax code means that the mortgage interest, property tax credits are eliminated, costing middle class families $2,000 in additional taxes. At the same time, capital gains taxes would be eliminated and the tax rate for the wealthy cut from 35 percent to 25 percent. Mitt Romney would pay no taxes.

Medicaid and food stamps would be decimated. Fifty percent of nursing home costs are borne by Medicaid. I guess we throw the elderly out on the street.

As far as education is concerned, this budget cuts Pell Grants, destroying any hope for a college education for thousands. Mitt Romney’s answer is to “ask your parents for help.”

The icing on the cake is that this plan would cost $4 trillion to $5 trillion over 10 years because it favors the very wealthy, corporations, and the military.

Joann Avery, Poland


Comments

1Alexinytown(246 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Sure, because in the hands of government, things run so much better than they do in the hands of the private sector. We already know Obama cut $750 billion from Medicare already to pay for ObamaCare. Why shed any light on something that has already happened?

You want to know who is screwing the seniors? The Obama supporters better take a good look in the mirror.

I love how we throw around words like 'Wall Street", "very wealthy", and "corporations" to illustrate a very populist viewpoint. Because that is all the Obama Campaign has left, to make this campaign about "us versus them", "rich versus poor".

Take the populist and race bating campaigning back to Chicago where it belongs, we do things differently here.

Suggest removal:

2chuck_carney(499 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Cong. Paul Ryan's plan to fix Medicare will not affect those 55 years of age or older. Medicare as we currently know it will be bankrupt by 2030. Maybe we should twiddle our thumbs like out timmie ryan and hope that iMedicare fixes itself.

The United States (as we know and love it) will collapse due to the tremedous economic burden of its debt and deficits. At least Paul is addressing the problem.

s/ A Catholic against Obama

Suggest removal:

3ytownsteelman(627 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Those administrative cuts are cuts in reimbursements, which will affect services to patients.

Just because someone proposes a plan does not automatically mean that the plan would be implemented. Start with a plan, then through compromise determine the best course of action to take. At least Ryan has OFFERED SOMETHING, which is something that Obama has not done. He even dismissed the findings of his own Debt Commission. He wants to kick the can down the road, and Joann fully supports that strategy.

Suggest removal:

4walter_sobchak(1847 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Social Security and Medicare, while noble in principle, are not sustainable under the current system. Within 20 years, they will consume every dollar tax revenue taken in. That will leave nothing for defense, infrastructure, law enforcement, jails, etc. All one need do is to look at the failed systems in Europe to see the end result. I give Ryan credit for taking on a serious challenge.

Suggest removal:

5DwightK(1236 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Walter, I give Ryan credit for bringing the subject up and putting forth a plan but he fails because he doesn't address the costs of healthcare. Giving people a voucher that doesn't cover their care because prices rise isn't a solution.

The cost of healthcare must level off or be reduced for any plan to be viable.

Suggest removal:

6tnmartin(203 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

No doubt the dramatic rise in cost needs to be addressed. Fine. Hang a LOT of lawyers as a good start, and continue with Tort Reform.
We all see those ads on TV, the tort-feasing shysters trolling with the "you may be entitled to significant compensation" claims. Where do you think that money comes from? A magic dollar tree? It gets added to the costs your doctor, your hospital, pharmacy, drug company, all, add to YOUR bill. How do you think that worthless philanderer, John Edwards, got rich? Sleazy lawyering, that's how.

Suggest removal:

7cathylukasko(116 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

When did "college costs" become a constitutional "right". Our parents helped us through college or we worked to pay for it. This "nanny state" philosophy was NOT the DEMOCRAT platform of JFK. "Ask NOT what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country". JFK would be a Republican today !

Medicare MUST be changed or there will be NO Medicare for our generation. DEMS will just ignore the future to win the current election - HOW SAD!

As for Social Security, I want an "OPTION" to privatize. I do NOT want the gov't to "spend my social security now" so that when I need it is INSOLVENT. Again, more gov't dependency is what DEMS want. America was NOT founded on DEPENDENCY!

As for food stamps, etc. When 47% of Americans pay NO federal income tax, it is time for the 53% to say "NO MORE" - although OBAMA just gutted the 1996 Welfare Reform Act (bipartisan under Clinton) so that Welfare recipients do NOT have to work to get welfare). Obama promotes Gov't dependency

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport