facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

 

« News Home

Renewal of school levy may be tough sell in city



Published: Sat, August 11, 2012 @ 12:00 a.m.

The president of the Youngstown Board of Education, Lock P. Beachum Sr., made two statements recently that show just how worried he is about the financial future of the troubled urban school district.

“It’s a renewal — it’s not a new tax,” Beachum, a former principal and teacher in the Youngstown system, said of the property tax levy that will be on the Nov. 6 general election ballot.

Why emphasize that point? Because the 10.4-mill tax the district is seeking is higher than the 9.5 mills now on the books. The larger amount is necessitated by the decrease in property values in the city since 2008, when voters approved the 9.5-mill levy.

Beachum stressed that the 10.4 mills will bring in the same amount of money — about $5.2 million a year — that has been generated by the current millage.

The second public statement from the board president that reflects his anxiety about the fiscal condition of the district is designed to reassure an increasingly restless public.

“This is not something we wanted to do,” he said of the tax levy.

In that, Beachum is absolutely right.

Several months ago, as the school board was contemplating the expiration of the current levy at the end of this year, we praised Beachum for insisting that the taxpayers deserved a break and, therefore, the property tax should be lowered.

He talked about the need for the administration to cut operating costs without affecting what was taking place in the classroom.

As a result, Superintendent Connie Hathorn and the school board determined earlier this year that there was no need for the entire 9.5 mills to be renewed because the district’s finances had been stabilized as a result of state-declared fiscal emergency. The state auditor imposed the emergency in 2006; it was lifted last year. A five-year forecast required by the state showed the books to be balanced.

But earlier this year, the district was informed by the state that it would be getting about $1 million less in funding than expected because of the loss of several hundred students. In the public education system in Ohio, the money follows the student. Charter schools, vouchers and open enrollment are siphoning money from school districts, especially those in urban areas like Youngstown.

That, coupled with reductions in the state’s per-pupil funding, means that the troubled city district — it is now under state-designated academic watch — is in choppy financial waters.

Economic recession

But, taxpayers are in less of a giving mood as they were before the national economic recession began in late 2008, as then Republican President George W. Bush was leaving office.

It isn’t only the slowing revenue stream that is cause for concern. The academic recovery plan developed by the state academic distress commission carries a price tag of at least $500,000 for books and other supplies to bolster the 7th through 12th grade curriculum.

Beachum and his colleagues on the board of education were sincere about reducing the property tax millage, but now the district can ill afford to lose money. The 9.5-mill tax being collected will not generate the same amount of money it now does. That’s why 10.5 mills are necessary.

The challenge facing the school system is to persuade the voters that this isn’t just a money grab. In today’s environment, that’s a tall order.


Comments

1Ianacek(856 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

Youngstown Schools should have been well aware property values were falling & the impact this could have on their finances . I'm not aware of the millage being adjusted downwards in the years when property values rose .

A lot of the reason property values fell so far in Youngstown is that institutions like the schools stopped engaging with the community that funds them .

Likewise , the loss of several hundred students . This didn't happen suddenly . it was progressive . Surely the schools' financial managers monitor student numbers , revise their roll-sensitive income forecasts & look for opportunities for income replacement or expenditure reduction .

Aren't taxpayers & residents of Youngstown tired of hearing excuses?

Perhaps voters should exercise the latent power they possess vote against the Levy renewal & allow the State to step in again & remind the schools' of economic realities

Suggest removal:

2TB(1167 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

The state did step in. What was accomplished?

Suggest removal:

3SAVEOURCOUNTRY(464 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

you can't make a race horse out of an A%$!

Suggest removal:

4Westsider(215 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

I won't vote for it - especially with the district's intent to impose a teaching method that is unproven in urban districts. The administration is making it impossible for those who want to learn and improve themselves to do so AND it wants me to pay for it? No thank you

Suggest removal:

5YtownParent(250 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

"Charter schools, vouchers and open enrollment are siphoning money from school districts, especially those in urban areas like Youngstown." That is like McDonald's crying foul because the Burger King across the street sold more burgers than they did last Quarter.

For once will the Vindy, The Unions, and the administration accept that the Youngstown Schools own sole responsibility for providing a poor alternative to charter schools, vouchers, open enrollment etc.

Maybe if the schools spent more time on Math and less watching Disney movies in the classroom, they'd have retained more students. Maybe if the teachers sent home classroom reports other than when they need more tissues or want more disinfecting wipes, less parents would take their kids (and their funding) elsewhere.

Suggest removal:

6olddude(194 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

He blames a decrease in revenue because of declining property values since 2008.... Well, what happened to all the money generated from 2003 to 2008 when property values were increasing?..........I'll tell you where.. The teacher unions saw all this xtra money flowing in and negotiated nice little raises....everyone thought property value increases would never end........Now, why cant the teachers take a pay cut when values go down?.......And this is the main school budget issue all over the country..

Suggest removal:

7theotherside(328 comments)posted 1 year, 8 months ago

If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport