facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Turn down additional duties, YSU faculty told



Published: Fri, September 16, 2011 @ 12:10 a.m.

By Denise Dick

denise_dick@vindy.com

Youngstown

Two Youngstown State University professors are encouraging fellow faculty to withhold their participation in departmental meetings and abstain from additional work, should the administration impose a contract.

The YSU-Ohio Education Association’s Crisis Committee distributed to members a four-page report, “Use Your Own Sense of Justice and Fairness.” The committee consists of John B. Russo, coordinator of the labor studies program and co-director of the Center for Working-Class Studies, and Gabriel Palmer-Fernandez, director of the ethics center.

Russo and Palmer-Fernandez via email each referred questions to Sherry Linkon, faculty union spokeswoman.

Linkon in an email said the crisis committee “operates as part of the leadership of the union, though they function independently.”

She said that union leadership does not review the crisis committee reports before they are sent out, describing it as discussing “ways that faculty could reasonably express their perspective, within the contract, on the administration’s actions.”

Ron Cole, YSU spokesman, said in an email that it’s unfortunate the union leadership would send out such a letter.

“Those kinds of suggestions will only hurt the university, and particularly our students,” he said. “I think the vast, vast majority of our faculty disagree with that approach. Otherwise, I think the letter speaks for itself.”

The crisis committee’s letter says the union “has been informed by trusted and reliable sources and in a recent negotiation that the Anderson-Schulick nexus is considering to unilaterally implement their last best offer in the next several weeks” — referring to YSU President Cynthia E. Anderson and Trustee Scott Schulick. The report says faculty members have been asking what to do if that happens and lists seven items to consider.

“The administration relies upon time and work that are beyond our contractual duties and for which we are not compensated,” it says under the heading of “Unpaid, Additional Work.”

“They extract from us a type of free labor.”

The faculty union and administration have been involved in a contract dispute since last month when YSU trustees rejected a fact-finder’s report that spelled out recommended terms and conditions for a new three-year contract. The union accepted the report, which included concessions.

After additional talks failed to produce resolution, the administration issued what it termed its last best offer. That called for no pay increases the first two years with a 2 percent raise the third and final year.

It also involves a reduction in faculty pay for summer school and increased health-care contributions.

The union rejected the offer and initially said members would strike. A few hours later, though, the union called off the strike, saying it wanted to return to the table.

Both sides have met since then although no agreement has been reached.

Faculty salary minimums are $75,674 for professors, $64,215 for associate professors, $51,238 for assistant professors and $38,689 for instructors. The average faculty salary is $72,213.

The report from Russo and Palmer-Fernandez says that trustees don’t know or care about the “important work and services we do almost daily on behalf of the university that go unrecognized in the collective- bargaining agreement, and without which the university cannot function properly.

“It is that kind of free labor that is totally under faculty control,” it says. “In order to help them recognize our full value to the university, we should be selective about which, if any, of those activities we continue to perform.”

It further states that while the contract says faculty shall attend university, college and department faculty meetings, it doesn’t say that faculty must participate in discussions, “and it certainly does not say that we have to smile and applaud either the President at her State of the University Address or any dean at college meetings.”

That’s particularly important for faculty in the colleges of those administrators who were members of the team “that belittled and abused the faculty, and persistently misdirected facts during negotiations,” the report says.

The professors’ report also refers to an email sent to some faculty requesting participation in the planning for Non-Violence Week.

“While this is a very good program, the Anderson-Schulick nexus must realize that they have to compensate our professional labor and time,” it says. “In response to such invitations, a faculty member might respond thus: ‘Because of the unconscionable actions by the Anderson administration and her negotiating team and out of my own sense of fairness and justice, I will not take on any activities that are not recognized in the collective-bargaining agreement and compensated appropriately.’”

It also cautions that faculty will face blame, referring to the administration’s contention last month that the enrollment decrease was the result of labor disputes.

“They seem to have forgotten that they had already projected a decrease in enrollment as a result of the establishment (and support) for the new Eastgate (sic) Community College and the regional depopulation,” Russo’s and Palmer-Fernandez’s report says of Eastern Gateway Community College. “Likewise, they seem to have forgotten that they had a perfect opportunity to settle with us when we voted to accept the fact-finder’s report. They chose not to.”

The university has contended that concessions are necessary to address a projected $1.7 million deficit this year due in part to state cuts.

A major point of contention is the health-care contribution. Under the just-expired contract, faculty members pay 1.5 percent of a monthly salary for the family health-care plan. Under the proposal, that faculty member would contribute 10 percent of the cost of the health-care premium in year one, and 12 percent and 15 percent in years two and three.

Faculty members have expressed concerns about not knowing the amount of the premium in the last two years while the university contends it can’t project the second- and third-year amounts.


Comments

1Tigerlily(491 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

Isn't it obvious that this newspaper's editors are interested in pursuing and persecuting individuals like John Russo, who they are constantly attacking, rather than pursuing information like how the university administration has been lying to the public via the Vindicator about how much the cuts in salary actually are for the faculty based on their final offer? They report around 1000 dollars in cuts, but in fact its several times that amount and more when cost of living adjustments are factored in. Furthermore, they sent the faculty an excel calculator, so the faculty could tabulate their own individual losses in this deal, and even the calculator they supplied showed a far greater loss for faculty members than the administration is reporting publicly. Where's that story, Mr. Sweetwood, Brown, Franko, and others? Where's that story? No, it's not for public consumption, because you have axes to grind with John Russo.

This newspaper is nothing but a propaganda machine.

Suggest removal:

2biteme(38 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

What have the trustees and university president given back to assist in this financial crisis? Are they paying more for health care also? If you want the professors et al to help financially then step up and be a leader and take cuts for yourself

Suggest removal:

3AtownAugie(701 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

And the "Linkon-Russo Debacle" enters a new and much more marxist phase. (John and your wife Sherry: you *do* know how the faculty and staff feel about your grandstanding, do you not? Please stop feeding your egos by seeking the spotlight -- your shadow puppetry is making a mockery of a fine university.)

Suggest removal:

4repeaters(206 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

Let's just pay them each $250,000.00 a year, raise the tuition to $50,000.00 a year, and that should make the teachers and students happy four at least.....a couple of years. This way, no ones miserable life gets disturbed. We must have happy, happy, faculty and students so life in this 'lucrative valley', can proceed without disruption.

Suggest removal:

5penguinfan1(29 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

I agree totally with Tigerlilly. This newspaper is so biased against the Unions at YSU that I shudder each time I read an article regarding YSU and the unions. It's a shame the only newspaper in Youngstown hates YSU. Just go back and read the editorials. Unbiased news is not what the Vindicator spews. It prints lies, and all it want is the unions to lose, lose, lose.

Suggest removal:

6DwightK(1263 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

Why would the faculty agree to a raise in health care premiums without knowing what the amount is? How could the university not provide the cost of premiums for the last two years?

That's bargaining in bad faith.

Suggest removal:

7jethead11(139 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

No matter what the university does or says, the union is going to drag this out until after the election in November. On the Weds after the election, they will strike, just like they've wanted to all along. Not striking now is just a political move so people are not reminded why they hate public sector unions before they vote. Let's see if it is "about the students" on November 9. I suspect we'll get a "we tried, but can't take it any more" press release.

Suggest removal:

8Tigerlily(491 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

Actually, jethead11, it's the admin dragging it out, not the union, if you're paying attention to what's happening. It's the admin that won't bargain in good faith.

Suggest removal:

9paulparks(235 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

Tigerlily,

Good Faith, my foot! Every time a union doesn't get what it wants, the other side is not bargaining "in good faith."

Chew on this - the YSU profs lost this battle when they failed to strike. Everything else is "face-saving" garbage!

Go back to your cushy jobs and quit crying!

Suggest removal:

10Tigerlily(491 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

In this case, it's not about not getting what one wants, it's about being forced to continue sacrificing and sacrificing even more, while the administration pays themselves more and more.

It's disgusting.

Suggest removal:

11taxpayer1001(274 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

I notice not as many are defending the faculty as were. Guess these antics are getting old for everyone but tigerlilly

Suggest removal:

12commoncitizen(961 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

what does tigerlilly do? Work at YSU as a prof? Or is she a part of the union?

Suggest removal:

13abcezas123(3 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

Folks, the faculty would gladly sign a contract for 15% of the medical premium, and in fact did support such a contract under the fact-finder. What the faculty will not accept is a contract that allows the administration to profit from a hiked medical premium due to vague language. Faculty have voted to take a sacrifice, but to see financial overages that were supposed to go towards their medical care end up as a cost-of-living raise for some upper-level administrator would be a bitter pill that none of you would want to swallow. We all need to stop bashing the faculty at YSU- their efforts have made the University one of the bright points of Youngstown.

Suggest removal:

14YtownParent(331 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

The administration of YSU, or any other business or industry, can't provide an exact dollar amount for insurance premiums until the current year rolls over and the insurance carriers adjust the premiums. This happens in most workplaces during the open enrollment periods. I have yet to see a contract that spells out more than a percentage of insurance premiums employees are responsible for paying.

I would think the labor leaders of YSU would have enough of a grasp of labor history to know that companies always ask workers to contribute more when budgets aren't breaking even. The workers that do keep their jobs, as UAW workers have done to survive the current recession. Workers that don't contribute more, out of stubbornness on their part or insane demands on management's side, find the the doors locked. Look at the mills and foundries like Valley Mould/Valley Vulcan.

Suggest removal:

15Peregrine(47 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

I cannot believe that any professional would actually say that “important work and services we do almost daily on behalf of the university that go unrecognized in the collective- bargaining agreement, and without which the university cannot function properly.

“It is that kind of free labor that is totally under faculty control,” it says. “In order to help them recognize our full value to the university, we should be selective about which, if any, of those activities we continue to perform.”

I believe that in the private sector that's known as casual time. Your salary pays you for ALL the work that needs to be done to get the job done, that's why you are considered to be a professional. Even if you are paid by the hour, you should do whatever needs doing to do your job well. Whatever happened to going the extra mile? When did a university professor's mantra become "what's in it for me?"

Suggest removal:

16Jerry(500 comments)posted 3 years, 1 month ago

RE. Peregrine - "that's why you are considered to be a professional"

I'll go back to my comment from some time ago: The YSU Faculty is free to do what they want to do; however, I will not be mistaking them for "professionals".

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport