- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

SB 5 foes take command in TV advertising campaign

Published: Mon, October 10, 2011 @ 12:01 a.m.


Money spent by We Are Ohio in the Youngstown media market for television ads in its campaign against Issue 2*:

TV station/We Are Ohio ad buys

WKBN-TV 27: $114,650

WYTV 33: $49,020

21 WFMJ-TV: $116,000

WYFX 17/62: $23,040

*The groups Building a Better Ohio and Make Ohio Great have spent nothing in the local market

By Laura A. Bischoff

Dayton Daily News


The television ad war being waged statewide over Issue 2 appears to be lopsided in favor of the union-backed group seeking to defeat the collective- bargaining reforms targeted at more than 350,000 public workers.

We Are Ohio, the anti-Senate Bill 5 group, appears to be outspending Building a Better Ohio, a business and Republican-backed group, by a 5-to-2 ratio, according to files kept by 17 television stations across the state.

Through Oct. 13, We Are Ohio has plunked down more than $1.92 million for television ads in Dayton, Columbus, Cincinnati, Cleveland and Youngstown, while Building a Better Ohio, the group supporting Senate Bill 5, has spent more than $741,000 for TV ad time.

Make Ohio Great, which is funded by the Republican Governors Association, bought $441,000 in those same media markets to run ads featuring Gov. John Kasich advocating for “reasonable reforms” without specifically campaigning for Issue 2.

The numbers were compiled by a consortium of newspapers that includes the Dayton Daily News, The Plain Dealer of Cleveland, The Columbus Dispatch, The Cincinnati Enquirer and The Vindicator. They do not include the Akron and Toledo markets and give only a partial read on the Columbus and Cleveland markets.

We Are Ohio said its tracking of TV ad buys in all Ohio’s media markets shows a total of $9.4 mil- lion spent so far: $5.4 million by We Are Ohio, $2.8 million by Building a Better Ohio, and $1.2 million by Make Ohio Great.

“We are spending a significant amount of money on the airwaves,” said Melissa Fazekas, spokeswoman for We Are Ohio. She added, “But we do think we’ll be outspent at the end of the day.”

Jason Mauk, spokesman for Building a Better Ohio, said, “It is a policy that we do not discuss our ad strategy so I really can’t comment on the extent of our statewide buy.” He also said he expects his side will be outspent.

A referendum on Senate Bill 5 will appear on the statewide ballot as Issue 2. A no vote is to reject the collective-bargaining reforms; a yes vote is to keep the changes.

SB 5 would outlaw strikes by public employees, institute a merit-pay system, allow management to impose its last offer on a three-year contract if the two sides reach impasse, require workers to pay at least 15 percent of their health-care premiums and 10 percent of their wages toward their pensions, mandate that seniority no longer be the sole factor in determining who gets laid off, and prohibit bargaining on issues such as grievances, promotions, and minimum-staffing rules.

Television stations are required to publicly disclose advertising buys for candidate campaigns but not for issue campaigns.

As a result, four stations opted not to reveal the buys while 17 stations voluntarily disclosed data to reporters.

Ohio Democratic Party Chairman Chris Redfern, who is backing We Are Ohio, said issue campaigns historically come down to television ads.

Although We Are Ohio has spent more so far, Redfern said he expects a great deal of corporate money will flow in to pay for a last-ditch push by Building a Better Ohio in this campaign.

Federal elections law allows 501(c)4 groups to collect unlimited, undisclosed donations as long as a majority is spent on their primary mission and not on electioneering.

Contributors: Columbus Dispatch reporter Alex Stuckey, Dayton Daily News reporter Joanne Huist Smith, Youngstown Vindicator politics writer David Skolnick, Plain Dealer reporter Henry Gomez, and Cincinnati Enquirer reporters Howard Wilkinson, John Kiesewetter, and Amanda Seitz.


1fd6636(255 comments)posted 2 years, 11 months ago

This means nothing!!! We know Pro SB5 are laying low, no big seceret! I am SOOOOO glad wkbn website is publishing the WHOLE oppressive, sub-servient bill for all to see. If anyone out there can figure out the whole thing, God, let me know what the hell it all means! There are so many loop holes that slant towards oppression towards police, fireman and teachers cant figure it out. But, if this passes, lawyers will be sure to profit because of all the pending law suits that it brings, and towns and citys will have to fend off the law suits with public dollars!vote no on 2!!!

Suggest removal:

2jupiter(116 comments)posted 2 years, 11 months ago

FD6636...the lawsuits are what is soooo funny about a bill designed to "save" money. I for one am looking forward to the comedy that ensues should SB5 pass: the blatant nepotism and cronyism that the Mahoning Valley is famous for will run rampant should SB5 pass. The resulting lawsuits will no doubt be John Kasich's true legacy...
Employers-please feel free to run wild should SB5 pass. As we have seen regarding such issues as residency, trampling on the rights of the "unconnected/unrelated" is a costly mistake. SB5 will embolden the powers that be into making similar, but more costly mistakes...

Suggest removal:

3SAVEOURCOUNTRY(470 comments)posted 2 years, 11 months ago

your are exactly right. the 250,000 to 350,000 or so dollars SB5 will save state wide will be a drop in the bucket to what the state will pay in legal fees for all the lawsuits. They figured it wouldn't happen since the broke the unions with this bill. However, the national unions will stay to assist with these suits. Once the public see's the truth of this bill and votes every last one of the fools in Columbus out and restores worker rights!!!!!!!!!

SB5 = more forclosures
SB5 = less qualified teachers with in 3 to 5 years.
SB5 = higher insurance costs
SB5 = higher local taxes or huge cut in services like plowed streets, emergency response times

need I go on with more facts!!!!!

Suggest removal:

4jasoninohio(119 comments)posted 2 years, 11 months ago

There is a reason those not in favor of this bill are spending more money, they know they are in trouble. The silent majority of people, those who support this bill, will have their say on election day.

Vote Yes on 2!!

Suggest removal:

5Cowboyfan(105 comments)posted 2 years, 11 months ago

No wonder it looks like We are Ohio is spending more. Vindicator gave the Pro SB5 FREE advertising. This article will tell you what SB5 will outlaw but not what it will do to local jobs and economies. The wonderful Make Ohio Great is being asked to pull their new ad for using a Great-Grandmothers face without her permission and changing what she said from con to pro on the issue. She is calling for the article to be pulled. Nice try Make Ohio Great.

Suggest removal:

6GTX66(343 comments)posted 2 years, 11 months ago

Remember the violent demonstrations over Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker doing away with the collective bargaining for teachers unions? The results are in. Some school districts went from a $400,000 deficit to a $1,500,000 surplus as a result. Why?

It seems that the insurance company that provided all the so-called "benefits" to the teachers was an insurance company owned and operated by the teacher's union! Since it was guaranteed to get the insurance business from the teachers and the State had to pay for it, not the teachers, it was increasing the annual costs every single year to become the most expensive insurance company in the state. At the same time, the insurance company was donating millions and millions of dollars to their favorite democrat politicians, who, when they got elected, guaranteed to keep funding the union's outrageous costs In other words, the insurance company was a "pass through" for Wisconsin taxpayer money directly to the democrat politicians!

Nice racket, and this is the racket that is going on in every single State that allows “collective bargaining” No wonder the States are taking it away.

Now that the State of Wisconsin is free to put the insurance contract out for bid, lo and behold: it has saved so much money that it has turned deficits into surplus amounts! As a result, none of the teachers had to be laid off, everyone got a raise, etc., etc; and the taxpayers of Wisconsin don't have to pay more taxes to fund the union's political ambitions.

If you weren't aware of the reasons why Governor Walker was fighting to take away collective bargaining, this gives you an idea of the problem!

Suggest removal:

7db(280 comments)posted 2 years, 11 months ago

GTX, government union corruption that we taxpayers have been saddled with is why our taxes are so high. SB5/Issue 2 ends more than paid retirement in middle age, double dipping, and gold-plated benefit packages. Union members getting paid not to work is just the tip of the iceberg. Thanks for pointing out yet another taxpayer ripoff. Vote YES on Issue 2.

Suggest removal:

8Shepard(3 comments)posted 2 years, 11 months ago

Of course its lopsided. Not to many people would go through the embarrassment of supporting SB5.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport