facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Youngstown city council hires deputy clerk



Published: Fri, May 20, 2011 @ 12:00 a.m.

By David Skolnick

skolnick@vindy.com

YOUNGSTOWN

By a 4-3 vote, city council agreed to hire a first deputy clerk, more than three months after she started the job.

Luanne Knox began working for city council Jan. 31 as a clerk with an annual salary of $40,958. But it wasn’t until Wednesday that council took a public vote to hire her, retroactive to Jan. 31.

Council members who voted in favor of the hiring said the delay was caused by mixed signals sent by the city law department.

Law Director Iris Torres Guglucello initially told council in late December that it wasn’t necessary to have a formal vote on the floor of council to hire a clerk, according to an email recently provided to The Vindicator by the law department.

But in late March, Guglucello wrote members of city council that the legislative body needed to take a public vote, said Councilmen Jamael Tito Brown, D-3rd, and DeMaine Kitchen, D-2nd, who voted to hire Knox.

Councilwoman Annie Gillam, D-1st, and Councilman John R. Swierz, D-7th, also voted in favor of the hire.

“We did it to pacify our law director,” Kitchen said of the vote.

The law department refused the newspaper’s request for correspondence between the department and city council about the legality of hiring Knox without a public vote.

Dan T. Pribich, the city’s deputy law director, said the letters weren’t public records because of “attorney-client privilege.”

Brown said the newspaper’s request for records related to the clerk appointment wasn’t the reason city council voted in public.

Though the city doesn’t have a lot of money, hiring a third clerk for council is needed to keep the office running efficiently, Brown said.

Councilman Mike Ray, D-4th, disagrees.

“We’re asking everyone to do more with less, and we should lead by example,” he said.

Ray, along with Councilman Paul Drennen, D-5th, and Councilwoman Janet Tarpley, D-6th, voted against the hire.

Before she was hired by city council, Knox worked as district administrator for the Western Southern Financial Group in Austintown for 16 years.

Kitchen also works for the company at its Austintown office.

While they worked together, Kitchen said Knox responded to an ad about the job, and he had nothing to do with her applying for the job.

“I think she’s a good hire,” he said.

Before Knox was hired, the city council office had a temporary part-time clerk in addition to Clerk Valencia Marrow, who makes $67,861.82 in annual base salary, and Terri Dawson, first assistant clerk, who earns $51,580.36 in annual base salary.


Comments

1MGShorrab(23 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

I know the former occupant of this "position" when it was held by a temp. She worked there for almost 3 years and was laid off after she placed first on the civil service test for the position. They not only created this job out of nepotism, but they temped it out for years to avoid paying unemployment. It's bs and backdoor dealing. They laid off a masters level associate professor with a decade of experience in government for this woman. Ridiculous.

Suggest removal:

2tylersclark(182 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

Mr. Kitchen was wrong to not abstain from voting in this instance.

Suggest removal:

3Nunya(1356 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

@ tylersclark

I'd whole heartily agree with that. Be it sheer coincidence or not he knows her. Which in non bias deliberations can't be overlooked.

I don't know any of the parties so I'm weighing in with total and absolute impartiality. To include the individual hired could be outstanding in what she does,.. however, it goes beyond that.

It goes both ways,.. if he liked her his vote to approve was tainted. As well as if he knew her and happened to not like her. Then she was dis-favored by undue influence.

So by upholding the sanctity of impartiality either way it goes. Mr. Kitchen should have either recused himself. Or been motioned by the panel to have his vote disallowed,.. and or substituted.

By that happening the way it did. Shows that the " legal department " that's referenced. Is negligent, incompetent at best,.. and or insufficient at the very least.

Suggest removal:

4debraweaver(30 comments)posted 3 years, 4 months ago

I think this smells fishy and I think that Kitchen should have abstained from voting.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport