facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Senate Republicans must slow the adoption of photo-ID bill



Published: Sat, March 26, 2011 @ 12:00 a.m.

In an obvious attempt to suppress the votes of Ohioans who do not traditionally support them, Republicans in the Ohio House have rammed through a bill that requires voters to present government-issued photo identification before they would be permitted to cast ballots.

It is revealing that this requirement did not come from Ohio’s chief elections officer, Secretary of State Jon Husted, a Republican, and that it is opposed by the AARP, the League of Women Voters of Ohio, the American Civil Liberties Union and Project Vote.

The minority Democrats accused the majority of advocating a modern-day poll tax, which was used to disenfranchise large segments of the population. They have a point.

Fortunately, the legislation will be taken up by the Senate, and even though Republicans are in the majority in that chamber as well, we are confident they will not rush to judgment the way their colleagues in the House did.

Our confidence stems from the Senate’s handling of the so-called JobsOhio measure which was rushed through the House, but received full-fledged committee hearings and debate in the Senate. It passed on a 31-2 vote, with most Democrats joining the Republicans. In the House, the measure, which created a non-profit, private entity to handle Ohio’s economic development programs, went through on a largely partisan vote.

The photo-ID bill would require a voter to present an Ohio driver’s license or an Ohio state ID or military ID or US passport at the polling place in order to get a ballot. Currently, state law allows for other forms of identification, such as a voter registration card, utility bill or bank statement.

Democrats, who blasted the GOP majority for having only two committee hearings, limited testimony and providing no real evidence of voter fraud to justify this extreme measure, contend that 887,000 Ohioans may lack the government issued ID that is required under the bill.

“Voting is a constitutional right which we have a responsibility to uphold, not make more difficult,” House Minority Leader Armond Budish, D-Beachwood, said. “This bill will negatively impact the elderly, college students, the poor and minorities. After years of reform and encouraging citizens to more actively participate in their democracy, this legislation will stop and reverse that progress. Are we returning to the embarrassing days when white male property owners were the only legal voters?”

Ramifications

We urge the Senate to consider carefully the ramifications of the photo-ID measure and to seek an answer to this question: If such an extreme step is justified, why wasn’t it a part of Secretary of State Husted’s election reform initiative called “Ready 2012 and Beyond”? In announcing the plan, Husted said the goal is to modernize and improve overall operation of Ohio’s elections and build voter confidence in the results.

Republicans certainly can’t claim that House Bill 159 will build voter confidence when the effect would be to make it difficult for many legal Ohio voters to cast ballots.


Comments

11970mach1(1005 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

Jibberish.

Suggest removal:

2sewingnut(33 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

I have had to produce my drivers license to vote in my precinct that last few years. Why is this news now?

Suggest removal:

3redvert(2064 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

"Republicans certainly can’t claim that House Bill 159 will build voter confidence when the effect would be to make it difficult for many legal Ohio voters to cast ballots".

The last thing in the world that we want to do is have voters prove that they have a legitimate right to vote. Oh, that's right, a certain political party would love to give voting rights to all the illegals in this country. Wonder which party that would be? Starting to make sense!!!

Suggest removal:

4city_dweller(194 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

I think it's far worse that in this economic climate, the legislature is pursuing a bill that does nothing to help Ohioans, and in fact makes it harder for many to exercise their rights. We already require some for of ID to vote, so what exactly is the reason for limiting the number of acceptable forms of ID from 5 to 2, especially since they are all equally legitimate and there is no evidence that changing the current law would do anything except make it harder to vote?

This is nothing more than conservative propaganda designed to promote fear and mistrust of all of "those" people who don't live like "us". If you don't have a driver's license or ID, you must be a criminal or an immigrant (legal or illegal), or lazy, or irresponsible, or all of the above, and you sure as heck don't need to be voting -- even if you have every right to.

Suggest removal:

5borylie(790 comments)posted 3 years, 6 months ago

Once again an embarrassing opinion by the Vindy staff. How do the elderly,college students,poor and minorities overcome the negative impact when trying to buy a plane ticket? How do they get an utility bill without proof of their identity? Then of course you have to use the race card. Minorities? Back to the days of white male property owners? Then in a related article by Kovacs,he claims the ID must be "lugged" around. What the heck is the size and weight of this ID? In this day and age we must know who everyone is whether voting or not. You Vindy editorial writers are an embarrassment.

Suggest removal:

6Ret(39 comments)posted 3 years, 5 months ago

I have always felt that voting is not only a right and privilege it is also a responsibility. Too many want to turn voting into a video game. Make it as easy as possible, and put as little as possible effort into it. I don't think that some people understand the difference between elections and voting for some TV game show.

My first 10 years after turning 18, I was in the Air Force. I had to make an extra effort to register for a absentee ballot as well as staying connected enough back home to make my vote count. It was very gratifying for me the first time I voted on election day in person. It makes me feel like I'm doing my part in trying to make a difference.

I can't remember exactly where I heard this saying, but it rings true. "People who show up make decisions" and when you show up be sure to bring your ID.

Suggest removal:

7Traveler(606 comments)posted 3 years, 5 months ago

What wrong with using a government photo id to provide you are who you say you are when you vote.
When you get a job you need a government id to apply to cash a check need that government photo id again.

But to vote the most important thing we do as citizen of a democratic society your word is good enough?

Suggest removal:

8palbubba(664 comments)posted 3 years, 5 months ago

Just look at the opponents of this bill. AARP, League of Women Voters, ACLU and Project Vote. Is this legislation so bad that only far left liberals oppose it? I classify myself as a moderate Democrat and I support this issue 100%. I also agree100% with the borylie post.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport