facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Niles schools chief to get $9,400 raise after a month



Published: Tue, June 28, 2011 @ 12:00 a.m.

By Jordan Cohen

news@vindy.com

NILES

Mark Robinson, who becomes superintendent of schools effective Aug. 1, will receive a pay raise of $9,400 or 8.5 percent after only month on the job in addition to his base salary of $110,600.

Contract clauses also contain the possibility of additional significant pay increases depending on pending legislation in Columbus.

A review of Robinson’s contract by The Vindicator shows that as of Sept. 1, Robinson receives “incentive pay for achievement of goals” of 7.5 percent of his base compensation and that “such payment will be included … beginning with the month of September, 2011.” The goals, however, are not defined in the contract language.

In addition, Robinson, whom the board hired May 31, gets “ancillary responsibilities compensation” of 1 percent of his base pay due to work he will have to perform outside of normal business hours.

After Sept. 1, Robinson’s salary would jump to $120,000, one of the highest for a superintendent in Trumbull County.

The contract also contains two provisions pertaining to the superintendent’s Medicare and retirement contributions that could significantly raise Robinson’s salary:

If Ohio law is changed to prohibit board payment of the superintendent’s employee contribution to the State Teachers Retirement System, referred to as the “pick up,” the board will increase Robinson’s salary by 10 percent.

The same applies to the board’s payment of the superintendent’s contribution to Medicare of 1.45 percent. The contract states that if Ohio law also prohibits the Medicare pick up of the employee share, Robinson’s salary will be increased by 1.5 percent.

In an earlier interview, Marlene Rhodes, board president, said she believed the payment of the incentive pay “was still being negotiated” even though the contract has been signed by Rhodes, Treasurer Linda Molinaro and Robinson. Rhodes said the contract on behalf of the board was negotiated by Atty. Timothy Sheeran of the Cleveland law firm of Squire, Sanders and Dempsey.

Messages for Sheeran were not returned. Neither were calls to Robinson, who is completing his work as superintendent of Ashland City Schools. Several board members also did not respond to requests for comment from The Vindicator.

Robinson’s contract could impact the current contract talks between the district and its 180 teachers. “Mr. Robinson’s contract is a huge concern for the membership,” said Mary Ann McMahon, president of the Niles Classroom Teachers Association, the bargaining representative of the teachers. McMahon, however, said she did not want to discuss if Robinson’s contract might play a role in the teachers’ contract demands.

“All I can say is that we are working for a fair and equitable settlement,” McMahon said. The teachers’ contract expires Aug. 28.

Robinson’s contract was made available under Ohio’s Public Records Law as was the contract of Rocco Adduci whom Robinson succeeds. Adduci’s contract with a base salary of $91,860, more than $14,600 less than Robinson’s base, does not contain a goal achievement incentive or the ancillary responsibilities compensation. The board pays Adduci’s contributions to STRS and Medicare, but there is no clause to increase salary should the pick ups of both be prohibited, an issue that had not arisen in the state Legislature at the time Adduci’s contract was negotiated.

Adduci retires July 31.


Comments

1Miki(90 comments)posted 3 years ago

No PROBLEM! Just raise taxes.

Suggest removal:

2inezniehaus(1 comment)posted 3 years ago


By learning from "Penny Health" When it comes to medical insurance, never use the words "experimental" or "investigational" or tell them that you want them to pay for a clinical trial.

Suggest removal:

3Photoman(989 comments)posted 3 years ago

The citizens of Niles should stop this nonsense by recalling every individual who approved of this contract. Even in better times, this is unacceptable.

Suggest removal:

4ohsuzyq(2 comments)posted 3 years ago

Hopefully Niles didn't give him a "moving expense" incentive like his last school district. Saying he was going to move to the new district, he used that incentive money to store things while he tried to sell his house up north. But when the house sold, he bought another house UP NORTH instead of moving down to the district that gave him the money to store his stuff. I'd consider that a breach of contract and, at the very least, I'd have demanded he reimburse the district the money they gave him in good faith. Watch him carefully, Niles, or you could be the next victim.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport