- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -

« News Home

Man who must pay $67K in restitution now faces perjury, bad-checks charges

Published: Fri, January 7, 2011 @ 12:06 a.m.


David J. Venerose, Jr.

By Peter H. Milliken



David J. Venerose Jr., 40, of Sheridan Road, was indicted Thursday by a Mahoning County grand jury on one count of passing bad checks and three counts of perjury, all felonies.

The bad-checks count pertains to three rent checks for the Iron Shamrock bar, 8414 Market St., Boardman, which were sent to New Pioneer FLP, owner of the plaza where Venerose operated the bar under a $2,000-a-month lease. FLP stands for family limited partnership.

The checks totaling $8,600 were sent between Dec. 3, 2008, and March 31, 2009, according to the indictment.

In an interview with The Vindicator before Venerose was indicted, Sat Adlaka, New Pioneer’s general partner, said the three checks, which he reported to Boardman police, were in the amounts of $2,100, $1,000 and $5,500.

Venerose operated the Iron Shamrock for less than a year after opening it in 2008.

Adlaka said Venerose had called him a few days before The Vindicator interview and left a message saying he would pay his debts to Adlaka.

The perjury counts allege Venerose lied three times under oath concerning material issues in a March 9, 2009, hearing in Mahoning County Probate Court concerning the guardianship of Geraldine Burke, an 89-year-old woman with dementia who resided in Boardman.

Venerose could not be reached to comment Thursday evening.

The bad-checks charge carries a possible six to 18 months in prison; and each perjury count carries a potential one to five years in prison.

The indictment does not specify what Venerose allegedly lied about during the hearing, in which Magistrate Vincent J. Wloch questioned Venerose extensively about the management and disposition of Burke’s assets.

In a judgment entry referring the Burke case to the county sheriff’s office for a criminal investigation, Probate Judge Mark Belinky wrote that he believed perjury occurred in the hearing, but the judgment entry wasn’t specific as to who allegedly lied or what was allegedly lied about.

When a reporter informed him of the Venerose indictment late Thursday afternoon, Wloch declined to comment.

Ohio law requires the prosecution to have two witnesses testifying concerning the objective fact to support a perjury conviction.

Under questioning by Wloch, Venerose said he first met Burke in the late 1990s through his mother, Edith Venerose, who was a caregiver for Burke.

In documents Burke signed in October 2008, the Veneroses obtained authority to handle Burke’s finances and health-care decisions if Burke became unable to handle her own affairs.

In February 2009, Judge Belinky voided those documents and froze Burke’s bank accounts after he said social workers and law-enforcement personnel expressed concerns about Burke’s living environment, care and finances.

In a settlement last month of a concealment-of-assets complaint in probate court, which was brought against him by Children and Family Services Inc., Burke’s emergency guardian, David Venerose agreed to reimburse $67,560 in legal fees and restitution to Burke’s guardianship estate over the next 16 years.

Edith Venerose was dismissed from the concealment complaint by visiting Probate Judge Denny Clunk.

Judge Clunk said there was “no finding of guilt” against David Venerose in the concealment case because there was a settlement agreement and no trial.

No criminal charges have arisen out of the concealment case.


1author50(1121 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

No theft charges? If he couldn't pay the rent, how does Judge Clunk(er) think that he is going to pay back Ms. Burke $67,000+? If I recall, in Clunk(er)s findings there is no punishment to Venerose if he fails to pay except for not being able to be a caretaker.

Maybe Mahoning County Probate Judge Mark Belinky could be a little more open and tell us exactly who, what and where Venerose lied about.

Suggest removal:

2smokey9911(6 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

What makes you think you have any right to know who, what, and where this guy lied? Its none of your biz!!! All you people who post here on the site think you know it all and can solve it all!!!! I believe YOU people are Ytowns problem! You sit around calling for justice but do nothing about it. You people make me sick!!!

Suggest removal:

3exposed(66 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

Slow down smokey. People have a right to wonder what is going on in a town where things have been swept under the rug for years.

I wonder if this guy admitted to taking $67,000 why he was charged with theft? And what about all those officeholders, Dellick, Hunter, Traficanti and Swierz who were connected to this guy. What was their role in all this nonsense.

Suggest removal:

4exposed(66 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

I meant why he was NOT charged with theft.

Suggest removal:

5Lifes2Short(3882 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

smokey says:

"I believe YOU people are Ytowns problem! You sit around calling for justice but do nothing about it. You people make me sick!!!"

People who post on the vindy are Youngstowns problem? smokie what are you really smoking?
I think the "criminals" are Y'towns problem, don't you smokie?

Suggest removal:

6TAXEDOFF(118 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

I think judge Belinky and his court deserve a lot of credit for exposing this guy and protecting the rights of this communities most vulnerable.people


Hunter should come clean!!

Suggest removal:

7Nunya(1356 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

@ smokey9911


Where not asking " Why " in favor of merely accepting that you're well within your right to express yourself.

However, in summary you're just managed to ensconce yourself as incorrect, combative, quirky, defensive and irrelevant all at the same time.

Where in my perspective every poster here excluding you has made very sensible inquiries bearing logical preponderances.

Hence your proverbial position as going beyond the Perineum as to be so anal retentive. Is so profound that one can only deride that your shirking your reticent posture. Solely in favor of reveling in such ribald rhetoric that reeks of implicit guilt

Suggest removal:

8henryviii1509(274 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

Ignorance of proper grammer cannot be camoflaged by multi-syllabic sentences!

Suggest removal:

9Nunya(1356 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

@ henryviii1509

How profound,..

Is that quirk anything like you telegraphing your non-substantive stupidity. With displaying such an individualistic idiocy of dare thinking it's an affable effort of trying to attempt to hide or deny it?,... ROTFFLMAO !!!

Suggest removal:

10southsidedave(5199 comments)posted 5 years, 6 months ago

This guy is scum. Lock him up for awhile.

Suggest removal:


HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2016 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes