facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Campaigns about Issue 2 cost $40M



Published: Sat, December 17, 2011 @ 12:03 a.m.

By Marc Kovac

news@vindy.com

COLUMBUS

The two sides of the heated Senate Bill 5 campaign spent a combined $40 million-plus convincing on Issue 2 last month.

We Are Ohio, the union-backed group and main opponent of the statewide issue, spent about three times as much as Building a Better Ohio, the main Issue 2 proponent group.

According to post- election campaign finance reports filed with the secretary of state’s office Friday, We Are Ohio added cash contributions of about $5.8 million and in-kind contributions of nearly that much during the reporting period.

More than $4.5 million of the cash total was provided in single donations by state and national union groups, including the National Education Association ($1.4 million) and the Ohio Civil Service Employees Association Local 11 ($1.2 million).

Added to early reports, that put total cash contributions at nearly $30 million and in-kind contributions at about $12 million, according to the filings.

We Are Ohio spent a little more than $29 million, including $9.4 million in the last reporting period, leaving a balance of about $730,000.

Dennis Willard, the We Are Ohio spokesman, left open the possibility that We Are Ohio would continue to exist and be involved in future issues and campaigns. He said an announcement could be made on the front early next year.

“Most campaigns — at the end of the campaign — they’re done,” he said. “But we ended this campaign, and we have over 100,000 friends on Facebook. ... We have thousands of email addresses. ... There’s this entire group out there of people who want to stay engaged. I would think that [the remaining campaign balance] is there to continue our next effort.”

Building a Better Ohio reported $3.8 million in cash contributions and $529,000 in in-kind contributions during the reporting period.

Added to earlier totals, that brought the Issue 2 proponent campaign to more than $11.4 million in cash contributions and $568,422 in in-kind contributions.

All of the cash contributions came through the campaign’s nonprofit, a setup that shields the names and donation totals of contributors in campaign- finance reports.

Building a Better Ohio voluntarily released the names of its donors Friday as it did during its filing in October. The list included Eaton Corp., the Ohio Chamber of Commerce, Ohio National Financial Services and Ohioans to Protect Jobs.

Total contributions from each donor were not provided.

Issue 2 was defeated overwhelmingly during last month’s general election, with 62 percent of voters saying “no” to the controversial public-employee collective-bargaining reforms supported by most Republican lawmakers and Gov. John Kasich. It passed in only five of Ohio’s 88 counties.


Comments

1joanburks(2 comments)posted 2 years, 4 months ago

I am sure High Speed Universities will offer an affordable and flexible alternative for any one seeking a higher education degree at an affordable price in a short time.

Suggest removal:

2commoncitizen(949 comments)posted 2 years, 4 months ago

$2.9 million from two unions, where did the rest come from? Why not tell the people? What about the union members that didn't agree with the money being spent for this "cause" and their union dues paid for it? didn't they get voice their opinons?

Suggest removal:

3Phil_EngAmer(32 comments)posted 2 years, 4 months ago

It’s hardly surprising to see such a high number. We saw records of money spent by unions in the recent recall elections that took place in Wisconsin (http://eng.am/rdchdL).

What you hope is that all this money wasn’t spent to mislead people. Clearly people had issues with SB5, but the flat repeal of it hardly solved anything in state. You were seeing districts facing layoffs prior to the vote (http://eng.am/t7B58P), and you continued to see them after the vote as well (http://eng.am/vLgGLx).

You still have districts all over the state struggling to keep their budgets balanced, and in order for any relief to be found you have to look at the way compensation is created. The belief behind SB5 was that you prevent collective bargaining from continually awarding state and local employees total compensation packages that far outstrip those found in the private sector (http://eng.am/pZofYR).

The people decided against that, so the onus is now on public unions to ensure that all the money dumped into this campaign was not just an attempt to keep the compensation imbalance in place.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport