facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Closing of mail center is expected next spring



Published: Tue, December 6, 2011 @ 12:05 a.m.

By Karl Henkel

khenkel@vindy.com

YOUNGSTOWN

On a day when the U.S. Postal Service announced plans to delay mail delivery, Youngstown was hit with more somber news.

A local postal union leader told The Vindicator on Monday the city’s distribution and processing postal center — home to about 500 employees — could close as early as March.

It is one of about 250 such processing centers across the country expected to close.

“All they are going to have left in Ohio is Columbus and Cleveland,” said Dominic Corso, president of the American Postal Workers’ Union Local 443, which represents postal clerks.

“They are going to totally change their delivery standards.”

David Van Allen, a post office spokesman, rebuked that claim, saying that the facility remains under consideration for consolidation.

He said a public forum regarding the closing is tentatively scheduled for Dec. 28, but that there is no time line for a closure.

The national closing plan technically must await an advisory opinion from the independent Postal Regulatory Commission, slated for next March. But that opinion is nonbinding, and only substantial pressure from Congress, businesses or the public might deter or lessen the far-reaching cuts.

A letter from USPS to Youngstown union representatives obtained by The Vindicator shows that USPS is preparing to move some Youngstown workers to other regional facilities such as Pittsburgh.

“They’ve already put the cart before the horse,” said Corso, who said the post office closures nationwide will continue until Congress makes a change to previous post-office legislation.

The letter outlines potential involuntary reassignments for 87 Youngstown workers and included a map showing a region within a 100-mile radius of Youngstown where USPS could transfer those workers.

The Youngstown facility is home to about 500 workers who contribute $500,000 in city income taxes.

The office of U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Avon, was disappointed to hear the news.

“Sen. Brown is concerned that the closing of the Youngstown mail processing center, along with nine other centers across Ohio, will lead to a degradation of mail service, significant job losses, and an undue burden on Ohio residents and businesses that rely on timely mail delivery,” said Allison Preiss, Brown’s press secretary.

Meanwhile, USPS announced Monday plans to push back mail delivery.

First-class mail is normally delivered in one to three days; the proposal will push that back to two to three days.

The move is expected to save USPS $2.1 billion because of a “significant consolidation of the postal network in terms of facilities, processing equipment, vehicles and employee work force,” the postal service said.

Corso said the announcement is a precursor to facility closings, which could cause Youngstown mail to travel to Pittsburgh and therefore could not be delivered in the standard one to three days.

There are a couple of reasons for the USPS cost-saving proposals.

The postal service still delivers more than 168 billion pieces of mail annually, a 20 percent decline from 2006, when USPS delivered a record 213 billion pieces, but The Boston Consulting Group Inc. expects mail volume to decrease to 150 billion pieces by 2020.

Declining mail volume is one reason the postal service has racked up multi-billion dollar deficits the past two years.

The most substantial reason, however, is the government-mandated retiree health-care benefit prefunding program.

Every year, the postal service starts with a deficit of $5.5 billion, as stipulated in the 2006 Postal Accountability Enhancement Act, which requires USPS to fund retiree health-care benefits 75 years in advance.

That is in addition to $7 billion in expenditures for current benefits.

This year’s $5.5 billion payment, originally due this fall, faces a Dec. 18 deadline.

The USPS has borrowed $12 billion from the U.S. Treasury and earlier this year it bargained with the postal workers’ union for 3.5 percent pay increases during the next 41/2 years.

The postal service receives no taxpayer money for operating expenses. Instead, it relies on the sale of stamps, which cost 44 cents (and will cost 45 cents beginning Jan. 22).

Congress has discussed two bills aimed at improving the viability of the postal service.

A bipartisan Senate bill introduced last month calls for the return of $7 billion of prefunded retiree-health benefits to USPS to pay for debts. It also calls for two years of studies on ending Saturday mail delivery.

A Republican-led House bill targets ending Saturday delivery and closing post offices. It also seeks to implement a post office financial control board.

U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan of Niles, D-17th, who is one of 200 supporters of a House bill to keep the postal service solvent, said he disagreed with USPS’ announcement Monday.

“Postal cuts to services, facilities, or jobs are the wrong approach to fix the USPS,” he said in a statement.

“I co-sponsored legislation to fix the pension system so the Postal Service would not have to make these cuts, and I wish the rest of Congress would join me so we could save these jobs and maintain the quality of service people depend upon from their local post offices.”

Youngstown’s postal headquarters, 99 S. Walnut St., first opened in 1977.

The $8 million facility was designed by P. Arthur D’Orazio of Youngstown and George S. Rider of Cleveland.

It was built by Youngstown-based B&B Construction Co. of Ohio.


Comments

1scrappy(20 comments)posted 3 years ago

Why do they have to be funded for 75 years? State worker pension systems only have to be funded for 30 years. Who lives for 75 years after they retire?

Suggest removal:

2author50(1121 comments)posted 3 years ago

I understand that The Lemon Grove is going to expand to the old Post Office Building next spring with oddles of taxpayers monies to pay for everything!

Suggest removal:

3Superstar7(122 comments)posted 3 years ago

The Downtown center is always very busy. Lines of people waiting for a clerk. The phone is always busy.

ANSWERS:
1. Don't close the Post Office, close the Union!
2. If we had political representation instead of Democrats that own this area, representation would focus on ending the 75 year pension funding.
3. Instead of raises offered during the next 4-5 years, CUT wages & expenses. Employs and pensions are the #1 expense and MUST be cut.
4. Moves to Cleveland & Columbus will only delay the problem & drive more to The Internet, away from using USPS.
5. CUT EXPENSES:
heat never higher than 66 degrees, A/C never cooler than 77 degrees.
6. Raise stamp, P.O. Box prices but CUT SALARIES!

Suggest removal:

4AnotherAverageCitizen(1175 comments)posted 3 years ago

How can you blame the local Dems and local unions for the closing of 250 postal processing centers? You want smaller Govt, now you are geting it. But now I hear people bit(I mean whine) and complain about the closure in Y-town.

superstar
1. you want your service but not have your neighbor have a good salary.
2 are local Dems responsible for 250 closures? Really?
3. I agree some pay cuts and freeze.
4. There will still be postoffices in the valley. You may just have to drive a little further.
5. they are cutting expenses by combining centers.
6. people allready complain about spending .44 cents for door to door service.

People want smaller Govt and no new taxes, are the ones complaining about the closure. Just remember folks, be careful what you ask for, you just may get it.

Suggest removal:

5dant3et(3 comments)posted 3 years ago

Congress has been told repeatedly that the extra 5.5 billion dollar burden, to cover medical benefits for retirees seventy five years in the future, would hurt the post office.

They still mandated this amount with out changes, since 2007. Why do you think this was done?

Why did the US Postal Service also have to over pay it's share of the Civil Service retirement money in the past?

Was all this money taken from the US Postal Service's budget, because the US Postal Service is a revenue generator for the Federal Government?

Suggest removal:

6Bigben(1996 comments)posted 3 years ago

Cutting salaries isn't the answer. The Post office has operated on a very tight budget and has been robbed of its surpluses for years. This was an intentional decision years ago to phase them out.

Suggest removal:

7hurrdurr(98 comments)posted 3 years ago

Watch who lines up to buy (I think steal is a more appropriate term here though) these abandoned distribution and processing centers. Fed Ex? DHL? UPS? A new entity?

It's a privatization scheme, folks. It's not driven by necessity, but by ideology. None of this had to happen.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes