- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 1 bath
$51000


Columbiana


Commercial
bedroom, bath
$1850000


- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Warren schools chief: No more excuses


Published: Thu, December 1, 2011 @ 12:11 a.m.

By Ed Runyan

runyan@vindy.com

WARREN

photo

Thomas

Superintendent Bruce Thomas says there is a “cultural shift” going on in the Warren City Schools that is hard on the school district’s 800 employees, but it’s a shift that has to take place if student achievement is going to improve.

First, he’s trying to banish use of the words “can’t” and “but,” — such as, when employees say students can’t succeed because of problems at home.

“I don’t want to hear it anymore,” Thomas said Tuesday to a group of community members who have agreed to sit down with Thomas and his administration periodically to discuss issues.

The 15 people are part of the Superintendent’s Advisory Council. About 10 staff members also attended the lunchtime meeting. Another will be in about six weeks.

“‘Can’t’ and ‘but’ have to disappear from our vocabulary. They can’t use the excuses anymore,” Thomas said of employees. “I don’t want to hear one more time that they didn’t go to preschool. Please don’t tell me what’s wrong. Tell me what you’re going to do about it.”

He added, “If I hear one more time that they [students] are two years behind when they get here, I’m going to vomit.”

“We are responsible,” Thomas said. “It starts yesterday, and these kids deserve better than what they’ve gotten.”

Thomas said the new expectations for employees has made “a great portion of them extremely uncomfortable.”

Thomas, who became superintendent Aug. 1 after former superintendent Kathryn Hellweg resigned last February, has been meeting each week with a handful of students with disciplinary problems because he’s handling expulsion matters personally.

In a hearing Monday, Thomas showed a sixth-grader the discipline form that indicated what he had done wrong. It became clear the young man couldn’t read the words on it.

“If they get to sixth grade and can’t read, that’s a problem,” Thomas said. “It’s no wonder they get into trouble. Who let them get to the sixth grade and couldn’t read?

“Kids need to be loved, liked and taught,” including the ones with blue hair, lots of tattoos and babies at home, Thomas continued.

One of the community members participating Tuesday was the Rev. Robert Stringer, who said he wishes there was a way for the community to re-establish close ties with the schools.

“There’s a lack of communication,” the Rev. Mr. Stringer said.

Melissa Watson, the district’s executive director of teaching and learning, said there are indications that achievement is already improving. Scores on the third-grade achievement test taken by third-graders in all four K-8 buildings in early October showed that 41 percent were proficient, an increase over last year’s number of 24 percent.

Watson attributed the improvement to extra learning programs put into place for the students last year when they were second-graders. She said the score is an encouragement to students, staff and parents “that we’re moving in the right direction.”


Comments

1doowoptokidrock(225 comments)posted 5 months, 4 weeks ago

This guy knows the right things to say but can he back it up? Making kids learn who don't want to learn by threatening teachers is one that will be interesting.

Suggest removal:

2Miki(71 comments)posted 5 months, 4 weeks ago

A 6th grader that was found to not be able to read. My question is what did Mr. Thomas do to correct this? Is the student being assigned to someone to teach him to read? Did Mr. Thomas do an assessment of this student class, looking for others that can't read? I bet there are more with this same deficiency close by. * What makes someone think that this kid doesn't want to learn? It could be that no one took the time.

Suggest removal:

3gdog4766(105 comments)posted 5 months, 3 weeks ago

Well, Im curious then what is teachers responsibility to a student whose parents could care less about their studies. A teacher cant control a students home life yet the powers that be always ignore that fact. If a child has learning problems or just needs guidance and help and gets none at home, how can a teacher be held responsible. Just explain that. You can take teachers from some of the most affluent school systems in the state, place them in the at risk school systems and you will see no change.

Suggest removal:

4southsidedave(1902 comments)posted 5 months, 3 weeks ago

Bruce Thomas has admirable ideas; however, he lacks the means to produce results.

If parents are not concerned; why should the burden of education fall upon educators?

Suggest removal:

5reallywow(1 comment)posted 5 months, 3 weeks ago

“If they get to sixth grade and can’t read, that’s a problem,” Thomas said. “It’s no wonder they get into trouble. Who let them get to the sixth grade and couldn’t read?"

~I believe the administration did... Teachers have tried for years, unsuccessfully, to retain children who can not read at grade level. Current grading policies make it practically impossible for kids to fail. Perhaps instead of blaming his hard working, underpaid, and unappreciated teachers, he should look at the administrative policies that allow non-readers to be promoted to the next grade level.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: