facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

‘No one wins in a strike’ is a phrase worth remembering



Published: Fri, August 26, 2011 @ 12:00 a.m.

Conventional wisdom holds that no one wins in a strike, but surely there would be easily identifiable losers in a strike by faculty members at Youngstown State University.

First among them, the students — consumers who have already paid for the service they anticipate receiving. They would be denied that service until the strike is settled.

The students chose to go to YSU — and even to pay an additional 3.5 percent this year over last. Their loyalty should not be rewarded by a faculty that refuses to recognize the economic reality of the day.

After faculty rejected what the university said was its final offer Thursday, a faculty spokesman said there would be pickets at YSU this morning and no teachers in class for opening day of the semester Monday.

Then late Thursday night came an e-mail in which the spokesman announced that while the faculty rejected the offer, they were not striking.

Levels of sacrifice

Those members of the faculty who supported a strike claim that they are being asked to sacrifice too much. But, apparently, there is no limit to the sacrifices that students should be expected to make.

After the board of trustees rejected a fact-finder’s recommendation for pay raises that would have cost the university $1.3 million, Stanley Guzell, the union’s chief negotiator, shared an observation. The cost would be less than half the amount generated by the most recent tuition increase, which cost each student $250. Mere bagatelle. After all, a student earning minimum wage would only have to work an additional 18 hours or so to cover his or her share of the contract offered the faculty. Perhaps if each worked an additional 25 or 30 hours during the school year, they could provide enough extra cash to satisfy YSU-Ohio Education Association demands.

Faculty are fond of pointing out that they — not the buildings or the books or the computers or the laboratories — are the heart of a university. But even if true, that doesn’t mean it is all about them.

Challenges of the job

We would acknowledge that almost anybody’s job looks easier to those who aren’t doing it than to those who are. Any faculty member would be able to cite tasks they perform and responsibilities they carry that would escape the attention of those of us outside academia.

But there are a lot of people going to work every day — some doing even harder and more challenging work than YSU professors and instructors— who feel they are underpaid. But they’ve chosen a career path for a variety of reasons, and while they might grumble and complain, they do the work that is expected of them.

The minimum salaries for faculty are $75,674 for professors, $64,215 for associate professors, $51,238 for assistant professors and $38,689 for instructors. Those are higher than average salaries, but, of course, the people earning them are more highly educated than the average. Still, it’s not a bad wage in the Mahoning Valley. The fringe benefits are not inconsequential, even if members would start paying 10 or 15 percent of the cost of their health care. And there are payments in addition to the base for some, particularly through very attractive summer school assignments, the scaling back of which became a sticking point in negotiations.

The bottom line is that most faculty are being asked to take a two-year wage freeze, with a 2 percent increase in the third and to begin paying a share of their health-care costs that would still be on the low end of what most employees in the private sector pay.

Future is unknown

Given the financial challenges facing the university — some of which can only be imagined with the impending restructuring of Ohio’s commitment to higher education — the board of trustees is only being prudent in seeking the concessions presented to the faculty.

Obviously some majority of the faculty disagrees, and obviously the 40 students who marched in support of the faculty while the vote was being taken would disagree. But the faculty should be asking itself what most of students — the silent and probable majority — as well as the rest of the community, believe.

The faculty was ill-advised to reject the university’s last offer on Thursday and to set the stage for a possible strike. Announcing that they are not on strike is encouraging, but raises questions about the status of a faculty that is now without a contract.

For a few hours Thursday night the faculty had dug themselves into a deep hole with the strike announcement. The subsequent retraction got them only partially out of that hole.

Over the weekend, they would do well to find their way to daylight by holding another ratification vote and approving a contract, even one not to their liking.

As we’ve already observed, it isn’t all about them.


Comments

1penguinfan1(29 comments)posted 3 years ago

I am so tired of the slant that the Vindicator puts on all issues YSU. This supposed professional media outlet does nothing but bash YSU. When it is convenient it is the unions they bash. Other times it is the administration. Let's be real here, without YSU, Youngstown will die a fast death, with little chance of growth.

It is a shame the only newspaper in town hates everything about YSU.

Truth be told, this last contract offer left open the amount that faculty would pay for their health care. How can anyone sign a contract that does not prescribe exactly what they would be paying for their healthcare? When asked what they would be paying the administration gave them no answer. I certainly would not sign anything like that. Why would anyone???

The faculty at YSU are among some of the lowest paid in the state. Look it up. I know we are among the poorest cities in Ohio, but YSU's tuition (even with the most recent increase) is still the lowest of the state universities in Ohio.

We all know this is about SB5 and nothing more. Kasich is pulling the Board of Trustees strings to push for a strike so public backlash helps those who support SB5. The admin wants to lock them into a crappy contract before SB5 goes down. We all know that. Let's all wait until the vote. If it passes, these issues will disappear because the unions will have absolutely no power. If SB5 is shot down the faculty can negotiate a fair contract. Let's not forget that the fact finder states the university is not in as much financial trouble as they are saying. Nobody mentions that. Let's also mention that the admin has stated they are taking a pay freeze for the upcoming year. There is a big difference between a pay freeze AND a pay cut. The administrators make the most money of the employees on campus. Why do they only take a freeze and not a cut? They also say they will pay the same as the faculty for their healthcare. Not the same percentage, but the same dollar figure. How is that fair? They make so much more money, but pay the same health care? Come on people, read between the lines. The admin wants everyone to takes cuts except themselves. Look at their raises. And no one is even mentioning ACE right now. Their contract is up too.

Suggest removal:

2pgurney(274 comments)posted 3 years ago

Sounds a lot like our government. Congress wants everything cut except THEIR salaries.

Suggest removal:

3bikerdadbmw(12 comments)posted 3 years ago

This has been a short coming of man from the beginning of time. One watching another, thinking the other has a better situation. They performed out of survival, today that's not the case.

The article above was in my estimation was written well and with no bias. After reading the post of Penguinfan1 I sense bias in the post not the article. A journalist reports the facts in a clear, concise fashion, no matter personal feelings. If any bias, it's in the readers take of the facts.

The State Treasury is in sad shape, many more than officially reported out of work. People are doing less with less because that is what you do to survive. In this climate we find those who want their world to just continue on as if nothing were amiss. Close your books people and come out in the light of day, look at what the rest of us are living with.

Suggest removal:

4penguinfan1(29 comments)posted 3 years ago

@bikerdadbmw - there probably is some bias, having lived in this area and been pro union my entire life. But I believe that this newspaper, does not report the facts in an unbiased manner. They bash YSU at every turn. They bash the Unions even more. To this newspaper YSU is nothing more than a punching bag, and as I said before, without YSU Youngstown would be in some terrible shape.

Obviously we cannot be told everything, but selective journalism is not something I want from the only newspaper in Youngstown.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport