facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Rates increase, not programing



Published: Wed, September 1, 2010 @ 12:00 a.m.

Rates increase, not programing

I am writing in response to the letter to the editor that ran on Aug. 25 regarding the Big Ten Network and Armstrong Cable. There are a few important points that should be mentioned.

If Armstrong wants to keep rates low, why have they raised their rates $8 a month since the Big Ten Network launched in 2007 while not adding one new channel to its expanded basic lineup? Armstrong has collected an average $288 in rate hikes from each of its expanded basic cable subscribers during that time period and yet, Armstrong has not yet delivered the Big Ten Network. That’s what doesn’t make sense.

To date, more than 20 million people in the eight Big Ten states get the network on their expanded basic cable or equivalent from network affiliates. Those companies include some of the largest and smallest television providers in the country — such as Time Warner Cable, which operates in the Youngstown area, and is one of the nation’s largest cable companies — as well as Shen-Heights Cable Company, serving 2,000 subscribers in Pennsylvania. These cable companies have all agreed to carry the network under very similar contract terms. In all, more than 300 cable companies and both satellite companies across the U.S. and Canada offer the network to more than 75 million people.

Ohio State kicks its season off on the network this Thursday against Marshall and Penn State takes on Youngstown State on Saturday — just two of the more than 400 live events network subscribers will see, in addition to all our new studio programming. Armstrong customers should know that they have other options to get the network — and if they haven’t already, they should start pursuing them.

Mark Silverman, Chicago

The writer is president of the Big Ten Network.


Comments

1FalconFighter(37 comments)posted 4 years ago

Mark, what don't you understand about your channel being a ripoff?? How can cable companies possibly justify paying more to carry your network than ESPN? They are the worldwide leader in sports. You are a regional leader of nothing. No thanks on the satellite idea, but I'll keep my Armstrong cable and continue to praise them for not giving in to the greed, I'm not interested in badminton and synchronized swimming. The economy in this valley is in the tank. Luckily, thousands of citizens will patronize local bars and eateries for atleast 3 games this year. The other 400, and I may add, much better and important games, will be available on ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, and the package of ESPN channels. These channels are available on the basic lineup. Yours is not. You may fool others on this topic, but I am highly knowledgable about the TRUTH, if you don"t believe me, feel free to read some of my other posts.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport