facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

2 face death penalty in Martin killing



Published: Fri, October 1, 2010 @ 12:10 a.m.

photo

Paul Brooks

photo

Robert Brooks

photo

Grant Cooper

ACTION and other community groups plan a vigil to remember the lives of Youngstown murder victims Thomas Repchic, Vivian Martin and Angeline Fimognari.

WHAT: South Side Vigil

WHEN: 6 p.m. Saturday

WHERE: St. Dominic Church, 77 E. Lucius Ave., Youngstown.

RELATED: • Murder suspect's father faces burglary charges

• Mahoning commissioner says vigilance is needed

• Vigil for victims

By John W. Goodwin Jr.

By John W. GOODWIN Jr.

jgoodwin@vindy.com

YOUNGSTOWN

Two men accused of targeting real estate agents for robbery – and one murder – will face the death penalty at trial.

Robert Brooks, 25, of Castalia Avenue and Grant Cooper, 21, of Sulgrave Drive, Brookfield, have been indicted by a Mahoning County grand jury on charges of aggravated murder, aggravated robbery, kidnapping and aggravated arson. The charges have death penalty specifications.

The charges stem from the robbery and murder of real estate agent Vivian Martin in a home on the city’s East Side. Martin, 67, was robbed and murdered in the Nelson Avenue home before the building was set on fire with her body inside.

Paul Brooks, 27, of Castalia Avenue, the brother of Robert Brooks, has been indicted on charges of aggravated robbery and kidnapping in connection with the robbery of a real-estate agent in Boardman Township. He is not charged in the murder of Martin.

Investigators with the Mahoning County Coroner’s office determined that Martin had been strangled to death before the fire at the home had been set. County Prosecutor Paul Gains said it is believed that Robert Brooks and Cooper shared equally in the murder.

“The evidence is that both individuals actively participated in actions that led to the death of Mrs. Martin,” said Gains. “There is strong evidence that Paul Brooks was not present during the murder of Vivian Martin.”

According to Gains, the death-penalty specification came into play because Robert Brooks and Cooper are believed to be the principal offenders in Martin’s death or committed the aggravated murder “with prior calculation or design.” The death-penalty specification also comes into play because the men are believed to have committed the murder to escape apprehension on the robbery and kidnapping of Martin.

If convicted of the aggravated murder with specifications, Robert Brooks and Cooper face potential sentences of death, life without parole, life with parole after 30 years or life with parole after 25 years.

Paul Brooks faces a potential 23 years in prison if convicted of the charges he faces. Paul Brooks is on parole for aggravated robbery out of Wisconsin and likely will face additional time in that state before or after serving any time in Ohio.

Gains said the alleged actions of the men, particularly the murder charge, must be dealt with decisively.

“This homicide I find personally offensive. This woman was going about her business trying to make a living and was killed through no fault of her own,” he said. “The actions of this office should make it very clear that these actions will not be tolerated and will be dealt with as strongly as the law permits.”

Gains said the Brooks brothers encountered a Boardman real estate agent Sept. 15 under the pretense of looking at apartments. The brothers ultimately held the agent at gunpoint, robbed her of a cell phone, money and other possessions, then warned her to remain in the apartment as they fled.

According to Gains, Robert Brooks and Cooper arranged to meet Martin at the Nelson Avenue location by falsely showing interest in purchasing the home on Sept. 20. Both men, he said, physically attacked Martin, robbed her, strangled her, then set the home on fire before fleeing.


Comments

1Stormieangel(136 comments)posted 4 years ago

BIG DEAL!!!! Facing the death penalty. And does anyone believe that will happen? Even if they are given the death penalty, they have years left to get a reprieve. If this had been a cop killed, it would have been more likely that a death penalty would be a given. But this was just an ordinary woman doing her job, being a positive in this miserable world.
Face it...we have a LEGAL system that is not necessarily a JUSTICE system. All we need to do is look at the ones on death row and how long the taxpayers have supported them. This is time, years that the victims' families wait for JUSTICE.
I think a well-placed bullet to their heads, upon their conviction of course, is a way to end the problem and save a ton of money.

Suggest removal:

2bouyantkym(30 comments)posted 4 years ago

these men desrve what they get!, there was no reason for anything here.BUT, on the posts here ,lets keep the racial remarks out!

Suggest removal:

3henryviii1509(274 comments)posted 4 years ago

These beasts are white! So what? Call them what you want, racially slurred or not. Noone is jumping to defend them for what they did and certainly noone cares if they are labeled 'white trash', it obviously doesn't bother normal white folks when racial epithets are used towards a white person who has done wrong! Why do the same things upset the black community?

Suggest removal:

4Siouxi(122 comments)posted 4 years ago

My sympathies to her family.

These 3 pieces of worthless human waste should get the death penalty.

Suggest removal:

5henryviii1509(274 comments)posted 4 years ago

I can only assume that, by not responding to my earlier question, the black community's only reason for acting upset over the use of racial epithets to descibe black criminals is for selfish reasons with the hopes of garnering some type of pity towards themselves and thereby blaming 'white racists' for the piss-poor behavior displayed by its' members

Suggest removal:

6redvert(2074 comments)posted 4 years ago

censoredship, I think this case has gotten enough publicity that Gains has no choice but to do his job.

Now, the question is, what will the judicial do when they are found guilty?

Now what will the defense say if the jury is all black? Will the lawyer claim they were biased against a white that murdered a black? After all the defense for the black that murdered the white lady in the church parking lot may use that argument if his jury is all white.

Interesting possibilities!

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport