facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Obama’s task: win back voters



Published: Sun, November 14, 2010 @ 12:00 a.m.

Associated Press

WASHINGTON

Near the midpoint of his presidency, Barack Obama’s diverse voter coalition reveals giant cracks and he faces major work repairing his standing among independents in states crucial to his re-election chances.

Catholics. Older people. Women. Young adults. They shifted toward Republicans in this month’s elections and failed to support Obama’s Democratic Party as they did in 2008.

Two years before voters render judgment on his tenure, Obama’s most critical task may be winning back those who aren’t affiliated with a party but who hold enormous sway in close contests. National exit polls from the midterm elections show these voters broke heavily for Republicans after helping elect Obama and Democrats in the two previous elections.

The trouble with this constituency appears even deeper for Obama in places expected to be closely contested in the next White House race, according to an analysis by The Associated Press of exit polls in 26 states. It shows just how much ground Obama must make up with independents between now and November 2012.

“Over the last two years, we’ve made progress. But clearly too many Americans haven’t felt that progress yet,” the president said after the election. “As president, I take responsibility for that.”

It’s impossible to predict a presidential election based on midterm results. That’s even truer considering that 131.2 million people voted in 2008, when Obama was elected, compared with 87 million this month, based on an AP tally of official and unofficial results.

November’s exit-poll responses provide enough hints that Obama could be in serious trouble if he doesn’t shore up his support in crucial areas.

“I’m not going to lie to you, I’m frustrated, and I blamed him for some of the bad shape this country’s in. We’re struggling,” said Earlene Durham, 32, of St. Louis, sounding like other independents who backed Obama in 2008. “But then I thought, ’Well, he’s trying the best he can.’ The only thing we can do is wait and see what he does in the next two years.”

Exit-poll questionnaires vary state to state, but on several issues that dominated the campaign this year, cross-state analyses are possible.

His job performance rating was more negative than positive among voters in states such as Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Obama won them all in 2008. In Indiana, where Obama was the first Democrat to win the state since 1964, just 37 percent approved.

Among independents:

More said their vote in a Senate race was to express opposition to Obama rather than to show support. This was true in every state where exit polls asked the question, and by margins of 2-to-1 or better in states such as Florida, Iowa, New Hampshire, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Majorities disapprove of Obama in all states but California, Delaware, Hawaii and Vermont, which traditionally lean Democratic during a presidential election. Obama’s job performance rating is lowest in West Virginia, where 76 percent disapprove. In Indiana, 69 percent of independents disapprove, and in perennially contested Ohio, 65 percent disapprove.

Most express broad dissatisfaction with how the federal government is working. Roughly four in 10 are angry in Colorado and Missouri, while about one-third feel that way in Indiana, Ohio, Washington state, New Hampshire, Nevada, Wisconsin, Florida and Pennsylvania.

A chunk said they want the government to do less after two years of Democratic domination in the nation’s capital. That’s almost a direct reversal of how this voting group behaved in 2008. Majorities of independents in each state surveyed except Democratic-leaning Hawaii said the government is doing too many things better left to the private sector and individuals.

Supporters outnumber opponents of the tea party coalition in all but Delaware, Hawaii and Vermont. In Missouri, half of independents call themselves tea party backers, compared with 18 percent who oppose it. Nearly half of independents support the movement in 2008 swing states Colorado, Indiana and Ohio.

More than half say their financial situations got worse in the past two years in Florida, Missouri, New Hampshire, Nevada, Ohio and Wisconsin. One in seven or less across the states said their financial fortunes have improved during Obama’s time in office.

About four in 10 in six states — Arkansas, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, South Carolina and Texas — said the $814 billion economic stimulus package hurt the economy. At least half want the health care bill repealed in 20 of 24 states where the question was asked. The exceptions were California, Delaware, Hawaii and Vermont.


Comments

1UnionForever(1470 comments)posted 3 years, 11 months ago

Obama has lost the middle class independent white voter forever - all the middle class independent white voter has to do is remember his racist comments about the white police officer, and the phoney beer summit at the White House and it's all over for him. Not to mention his Obamacare, Stimulus Earmark Pork Job creation failure, and the Cap & Trade failures. 2013 will see a new GOP President in office.

Suggest removal:

2fedup2010(18 comments)posted 3 years, 11 months ago

To FairandEqual and UnionForever
You two remarks is a few good reasons that this county, state and city will be stuck..The unions is one of the reasons we are in so much bull**** and "unionforever", just because "your GOP" has won a few seats..Whites are become a minority and they are scared, best believe that President Barrak Obama will have another term, so get used to saying President Obama..

Suggest removal:

3VINDYAK(1799 comments)posted 3 years, 11 months ago

Thoughts to ponder - let's not write him off yet. He has 2 years to get himself back together. I see a different opportunity for him, though. If the poeple get turned off by overzealous Congressional actions, you could see the people revolt again in the 2012 election. Even though this guy is hated by many of us, he could quickly jump back into the lead if his "enemies" stumble as well.

These next 2 years will be trying times, as the people want to see positive results, not more talk or a disfunctional Congress. The Great Nobel Peace Prize winner (who did nothing to earn it) has the opportunity to make a mess of things for the Republican controlled House of Representatives, or he could go along with all the Republican programs and use it against them in 2012 if things do not improve. Either way, the cards are in his favor for 2012, as he has a billion dollar war chest building up and the other party has no clear leader yet.

Suggest removal:

4southsidedave(4784 comments)posted 3 years, 10 months ago

Obama states that his administration has made progress...what progress is this?

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport