facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Secrecy on part of lawmakers should anger Ohio’s taxpayers



Published: Tue, November 2, 2010 @ 12:00 a.m.

If you want to know how much re- spect our state legislators have for us (the private sector taxpayers), consider this comment from Rep. William Batchelder, the Republican minority leader, on the issue of public pensions and his being the Legislature’s biggest double dipper:

“I’m not going to deal with all that. Apparently, the legislative function has escaped you. I vote for traffic laws. I vote for real estate laws that affect me. I’m not going to get into that.”

What was it that got Batchelder’s defenses up?

Questions from the Akron Beacon Journal and The Plain Dealer of Cleveland about his collecting more than $100,000 in retirement benefits from the Public Employees Retirement System and another $86,000 in House leadership pay.

But Batchelder isn’t the only one in the Ohio General Assembly who has decided to tell the state’s major newspapers, which have spent the several months investigating the public pension system, to stuff it. By extension, the legislators are telling the people of Ohio that details of the public pension system aren’t any of their business — even though taxpayers are footing the bill to ensure public employees enjoy a financially comfortable retirement, complete with health care coverage that most private sector workers can only dream about.

Such arrogance on the part of lawmakers in Columbus who are the beneficiaries of this largess must not go unpunished.

Latest summary

In the latest story on the public pension system by the Beacon Journal and the Plain Dealer published in Sunday’s Vindicator, the following paragraph summed up what is going on in the General Assembly:

“Every one of Ohio’s 132 legislators is part of the Public Employees Retirement System and stands to benefit from keeping the fund solvent — and to lose out if benefits are reduced or the required service time is increased.”

The problem is members of the House and Senate want to keep the PERS and the other four public pension funds solvent while keeping the taxpayers, through the Ohio Newspaper Organization, in the dark about such issues as service time, pay and benefits for each of the 400,000 pensioners and the hundreds of thousands of public employees.

The ONO is a collaborative of the state’s largest newspapers, including The Vindicator.

The papers have gone so far as to agree to the names of the pension recipients being excluded from the records. We believe that such an accommodation is overly generous, given that billions of tax dollars are funneled into the public pension plans.

Indeed, state legislators will soon be dealing with proposals from all five Ohio public pensions to shore up their funds, such as raising retirement ages and boosting contributions from public employees and taxpayers. Four of the systems want to change the guaranteed 3 percent annual cost-of-living allowance for their retirees. Two of the funds are seeking hundreds of millions of dollars more from the taxpayers to make up anticipated shortfalls.

No answers

But when the newspapers sent a questionnaire to each legislator seeking information about his or her pension memberships and the number of immediate family members — children, spouses and parents — who were participants in a state pension plan, the response was predictable: Democratic and Republican leaders said they and their members would not answer the survey.

What does that tell you?

We, the private sector taxpayers, are being treated like saps by those who want us to bolster their pensions.

It’s time for citizens groups to join Ohio’s newspapers in putting a stop to this violation of the public’s trust.


Comments

1author50(1121 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

The newspapers have been dormant for years on this issue, because of the amounts of government ads placed in newspapers.

Probably will take an act of the Almighty to change this corrupt system.

Suggest removal:

2Stan(9923 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

Our liberal politicians deserve all that they can fleece from us . They are special .

Suggest removal:

3theotherside(329 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

You get what you pay for. The costs of running government is high. No doubt. Some of that cost includes retirement benefits. If those costs are too high for the public to handle, drop the expenses down or eliminate them and let those who would do the work for the lower cost take those jobs and run the government. Those that refuse to do the work at those costs will then be forced to compete in the private sector for those available jobs and benefits. Seems like a simple example of supply and demand to me.

Suggest removal:

4Traveler(606 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

Got to love how politicians are all for open government and accountability to they start getting asked questions.

Suggest removal:

5frank(9 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

You endorse all school levies. Then you come out with this article on November 2nd. What about STRS ???Do you realize how many administrators in the local school system are double dippers. Why dont you write about that. Approximately 80 to 85% of all dollars within a school system go to wages and benefits and yett yhe Vindicator endorses all local school levies and then beats up on public officials. There are some superintendents in the Mahoning County making over 200k annually when you total their current pension,there current salary and benefits. Why dont you write about that. Batchelder is small potatoes to others who are milking the system here locally. Do your homework !!!

Suggest removal:

6fd6636(255 comments)posted 3 years, 9 months ago

WHEN THE ECONOMY WAS "GOOD" NO ONE CARED ABOUT THE PUBLIC PENSIONS, AND SOME EVEN LAUGHED FROM THE PROFESSIONAL SIDE ABOUT THE " MORSELS" WE WERE MAKING IN OUR TINY LITTLE LIVES. NOW WITH THE ECONOMY GOING SOUTH, MANY OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE SADLY LOOSING THEIR JOBS ARE NOW UPSET THAT WE ARE MAKING MORE THAN THEY ARE! NOW YOU WANT TO CUT OUR PENSIONS BECAUSE YOURS WENT BAD??? YOU CHOOSE YOUR PATH IN LIFE. END.

Suggest removal:

7anothermike(203 comments)posted 3 years, 8 months ago

The majority of our legislators are "fiscal conservatives" until it comes to the public pension plans. They can "double dip" collecting a full pension and a full salary from the same source, yet senior citizens in Ohio are not eligible for unemployment benefits when they are laid off from their private employment.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport