facebooktwitterRSS
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up
- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Jury is still out on who was right or wrong about Oakhill



Published: Fri, May 28, 2010 @ 12:00 a.m.

It still sticks in the craw of two present county officials and a former official that a majority on the board of commissioners listened to the county’s building commission rather than them when Mahoning County faced an office-space crisis four years ago.

Or perhaps Commissioner John A. McNally IV, Auditor Michael V. Sciortino and former county Treasurer John B. Reardon have other motivations for holding a press conference Tuesday to announce that they have been exonerated regarding their opposition to the county’s development of Oakhill Renaissance Place as a county office complex. The building is the former South Side Hospital, and today it is being successfully converted into office space for various county offices and other rent-paying tenants.

McNally, Sciortino and Reardon, who is recently returned from Columbus after resigning from the Ohio Commerce Department, were throwing around numbers and hyperbole during their press conference. Some of their calculations certainly appear open to interpretation, and it would appear too early to mathematically prove success or failure. Sciortino’s contention that the Oakhill purchase is the county’s equivalent of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill has the smell of desperation.

The county faced multiple challenges in 2006 and the Oakhill purchase provided a quick solution to the most pressing problems and a long-term opportunity to consolidate various offices.

One issue was the deplorable conditions that had developed at the offices of the county’s Department of Job and Family Services in the Garland Plaza on Youngstown’s East Side. The county was spending more than $1.1 million a year for the Cafaro Co.-owned offices under a lease signed by former commissioners that placed virtually all responsibility for maintenance and repairs on the county.

Employees complained that conditions had deteriorated to the extent that some workers’ health was being affected. At that point, liability issues had become a serious concern for the commissioners — or at least two of them.

At the same time, the Southside Community Development Corp., which was operating Oak–hill, filed for bankruptcy. That meant that various offices already in Oakhill faced eviction, including the county coroner’s office, which was using the old hospital’s morgue facilities.

The action plan

The county picked up the building for a song, sold bonds to finance renovations, avoided having to find an available morgue for the coroner and transferred JFS from Garland to Oakhill.

McNally, Sciortino and Reardon claim that the county would have been better off building a new office, which Reardon estimates would have cost $15 million. That ignores the time crunch the commissioners were under at the time and the fact that renovation is less than half the cost of new construction. Also, the county has been able to get grants for energy-saving improvements that have cut costs.

And, importantly, it ignores the community service that Commissioner Anthony Traficanti and David Ludt, who supported the Oakhill project, performed by preserving a usable community asset. Had Oakhill remained vacant, it would have developed into a monumental eyesore and a hazard on the fringe of downtown.

A grand jury is investigating circumstances surrounding the purchase of Oakhill, but its focus, based on characterizations provided by some of those who have been interviewed by prosecutors, is not on those people who worked in good faith to make the project happen. The grand jury appears more interested in the motives behind those who tried to block it.


Comments

1author50(1121 comments)posted 4 years, 1 month ago

We should call this 'Mutiny on the County'!

Both sides are wrong and the people have and will continue to suffer.

Oakhill is the epitome of a boondoggle and eventually will have to be abandoned because of the high costs and low rents that will eat away the general fund to nothing. That will be Traficanti's, Ludt's and Tablack's legacy.

Looks like ruined political careers and possible jail time will be the legacy of the others.

The people? We get the usual.

Suggest removal:

2burford(95 comments)posted 4 years, 1 month ago

The Vindicator should do some investigating rather than relying on Tablack.

The costs of Oak Hill have been underreported. The budget for the maintenance department for the County alone rose $2,000,000 in the first two years the County purchased Oak Hill.

The costs of utilities are enormous, The workers complain the building is cold because the County can't or won't keep it heated. There is mold in the building. There are lots of tiny offices built for a hospital that cannot be used.

There are back taxes, an unpaid loan on the building, poor parking for the public (the employees get the deck) and it is in the ghetto.

In justifying their support the Vindicator previously said the eyesore was in the central business district. After a lot of posters correctly called them on this they now back peddle and say it is on the fringe of downtown.

The only urgency was moving the Coroner's office? Does that alone justifying buying this dump? And would it really have cost $2,000,000 to relocate the coroner's office? What do you need? An operating table, some surgical tools and a few refrigeration units? C'mon.

Like the Jail and the Annex this will be another waste of precious tax dollars around the neck of this community for the forseeable future.

Suggest removal:

3highcherokee(41 comments)posted 4 years, 1 month ago

Wasn't the building commission formed a couple months AFTER the purchase? So the recommendations were made based upon the fact that the county already owned the property.

Why isn't anyone looking into Gains using his position to get back at these guys for supporting his opponent?

Why isn't anyone looking into T & L doing this deal because they wanted retribution for Cafaro supporting their opponents?

Suggest removal:

4city_resident(508 comments)posted 4 years, 1 month ago

"Wasn't the building commission formed a couple months AFTER the purchase?"

I don't think so... Can you provide a link or something?

Since I'm replying, I'll add that I think the Oakhill purchase was a good idea, and the opposition to the purchase is mainly "political."

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2014 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: Vindy Wheels | Vindy Jobs | Vindy Homes | Pittsburgh International Airport