- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 1 bath
$51000


Columbiana


Commercial
bedroom, bath
$1850000


- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Zero-tolerance plan only gives a perception of fighting crime


Published: Tue, May 25, 2010 @ 12:00 a.m.

Zero-tolerance plan only gives a perception of fighting crime

I must say that the recent zero-tolerance blitz was nothing but a joke in issuing citations to minor traffic offenders. Seriously, in all my years living in Youngstown, I’ve never been pulled over by a Youngstown police officer and never had any past driving issues until recently.

As I was being pulled over, I wondered, what did I do? When the officer came to my car and asked for my license and registration without telling me why he pulled me over, I asked him “aren’t you supposed to tell me what you pulled me over for first?” Supposedly, I “rolled” a stop sign, which basically means I didn’t come to a complete stop. Now, this particular stop sign is not near the corner so it’s hard to realize it‘s there; it’s not like I ran it and just kept going. Later, I came back to this area and watched how other drivers approached this stop sign, and surprisingly they all did the same thing. Therefore, this tells me that this officer could’ve stayed in that spot all day and literally wrote citations for “rolling” a stop sign all day, instead of spending time doing real police work.

This type of policing is a reason why a lot of people dislike police, especially when you live in a high-crime area where some people feel there are more important issues to focus on. I mean, is Youngstown really known for having the highest minor traffic offenses in the country? This type of policing is more what I would expect from Poland, Boardman, Canfield, Austintown, Liberty and Coitsville but not the YPD. These other township police don’t have the challenge of dealing with major crime problems as the YPD does because they are simply not high crime areas. If focusing on minor traffic offenses is to help deter major criminal offenses, I would really like to know where this has worked.

All in all, it seems that right now the YPD is more concerned about minor offenses just to show stats that they are doing something instead of dealing with more major crime issues. They’re building a perception that they are doing everything they can do to deter more violent crimes, when in reality this is not the case.

Matthew Livingston, Youngstown


Comments

1madasheck(64 comments)posted 2 years ago

although the zero toleracne blitz does keep the real criminals hiding in the house for a day or two I think the actual purpose was to increase revenue

Suggest removal:

2Woody(413 comments)posted 2 years ago

Well Matt,

I would encourage you to go back and read the definition of the word STOP.

While it may seem like something minor, thise little traffic stops can go a long way to preventing crime. A police stop for a moving violation can turn into an arrest for narcotics, weapons, or other major violations.

Suggest removal:

3woolyd(578 comments)posted 2 years ago

Woody the reality is 99.9% of the time the police have no legitimate reason to search a vehicle they pull over for a minor traffic violation. The reality is that most citizens dont understand their rights and voluntarily allow their car to be searched. And trust me when the police search a car anything can become "drug paraphenalia". Sandwich bags, a broken antenna, rolling papers, an old medicine bottle, lighter, etc,etc,etc.

Suggest removal:

4Rokscout(310 comments)posted 2 years ago

Stops lead to arrests, and without the actual drug, or tested/confirmed residue, it's not paraphernalia, but otherwise good job on knowing how to do the job, but not actually stepping up and doing it.

Suggest removal:

5SouthSideScanner(12 comments)posted 2 years ago

WOW! The editor really chopped up my letter...lol. But here is the original:
-
I must say, that the zero tolerance blitz this past week was nothing but a joke in issuing citations to minor traffic offenders. Seriously, in all my years living in Youngstown I’ve never been pulled over by a Youngstown police officer and never had any past driving issues until recently. As I was being pulled over I thought is was funny because I’ve never been pulled over before and then I thought to myself, what did I do? It was even more funnier when the officer came to my car and asked for my license and registration without telling me what he pulled me over for. So, I asked him “aren’t you suppose to tell me what you pulled me over for first? Supposedly, I “rolled” a stop sign which basically means I didn’t come to a complete stop when coming to this stop sign. Now, this particular stop sign is not near the corner so it’s hard to realize it‘s there, it’s not like I ran it and just kept going. Later, I came back to this area and watched how other drivers approached this stop sign and surprisingly they all did the same thing. Therefore, this tells me that this officer could’ve stayed in that spot all day and literally wrote citations for “rolling” a stop sign all day. In this city, instead of doing this when was he going to spend time doing real police work?

This type of policing is a reason why a lot of people dislike police, especially when you live in a more high crime area some people feel that don’t they have more important issues to focus on. I mean, is Youngstown really known for having the highest minor traffic offenses in the country? This type of policing is more what I would expect from Poland, Boardman, Canfield, Austintown, Liberty and Coitsville but not the YPD. These other township police don’t have the challenge of dealing with major crime problems as the YPD does because they are simply not high crime areas. If focusing on minor traffic offenses is to help deter major criminal offenses, I would really like to know where this has worked.

All in all, it seems that right now the YPD is more concerned about minor offenses just to show stats that they are doing something instead of dealing with more major crime issues. Why? I’m sure it’s easier to deal with, make a case of and solve compared to a major crime. The perception is to have the public thinking that they are doing everything they can do to deter more violent crimes when in reality this is not the case. Lets just say this is the case, well then why did it take all these years for Youngstown to implement such a strict policy? Is it possibly because of the horrible death of Angeline Fimognari? Sorry to say, but this should not be the number one reasoning why. It’s not like before her death Youngstown didn’t have a major crime problem.

Matthew Livingston, Youngstown

Suggest removal:

6SouthSideScanner(12 comments)posted 2 years ago

On one hand, one can say we have to follow the law and no matter how minor or major it is it’s still the law. On the other hand, one can say in this country and in other countries around the world, the law doesn’t follow the law.

Suggest removal:

7FifthAve(155 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

I totally agree with Livingston. Zero tolerance does not reduce crime; it does, however, raise money for the city of Youngstown on the backs of people who can least afford to pay.

Suggest removal:

8FifthAve(155 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Woody, I can't believe that you buy the words you put on paper! These little stops do not impact crime at all, but they prove to be a hardship on those of us who are stopped for nothing!

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: