Youngstown News, Psychiatrist: Boy is not amenable to rehabilitation
- Advertisement -
  • Most Commentedmost commented up
  • Most Emailedmost emailed up
  • Popularmost popular up

Cortland


Residential
3 bedroom, 1 bath
$51000


Columbiana


Commercial
bedroom, bath
$1850000


- Advertisement -
 

« News Home

Psychiatrist: Boy is not amenable to rehabilitation


Published: Sat, March 13, 2010 @ 12:05 a.m.

MARY GRZEBIENIAK

news@vindy.com

NEW CASTLE, Pa.

A prosecution psychiatrist says a 12-year-old accused of homicide is not amenable to rehabilitation.

That was part of the testimony given Friday during a hearing before Lawrence County Common Pleas Court Judge Dominick Motto, who must decide by April 1 whether Jordan Brown of New Galilee will be tried as an adult or juvenile in the shooting death of his father’s pregnant girlfriend, Kenzie Houk, 26.

Jordan is charged with two counts of criminal homicide, one for the fetus, in the slayings which took place at the family home Feb. 20, 2009. If convicted as an adult, he would face life in prison without parole and would be the youngest defendant in the nation to be so sentenced. If convicted as a juvenile, he could be held only until he is 21.

Prosecution psychiatrist Dr. John O’Brien of Philadelphia, who evaluated Jordan on Feb. 24, testified Friday that he believes it is unlikely that Jordan is amenable to rehabilitation.

He disputed the testimony of defense psychologist Dr. Kirk Heilbrun who testified in January that he believes Jordan is amenable to treatment in a juvenile facility because of his strong family support, his social involvement and his lack of significant problems prior to the murders.

O’Brien said that avoiding responsibility is a pattern with Jordan and would “complicate the process of rehabilitation.” He said rehabilitation cannot begin until an offender takes responsibility for his behavior. He described Jordan as a “juvenile with significant personality problems complicated by presenting to authority a version of himself which doesn’t include the negative.” He added Jordan also is easily angered.

O’Brien said Jordan is sensitive to feeling that other children were favored. A few years prior to the murders, a problem with the son of another woman that he and his father lived with resulted in Jordan having several sessions of counseling. Jordan at the time perceived that the boy received more Christmas gifts than he did. O’Brien noted that at the time of Houk’s killing, Jordan was being moved out of his bedroom to make room for the baby that Houk and Jordan’s father, Chris Brown, were expecting.

He said Jordan also resented his biological mother, who abandoned him, and complained that she favored a half-sister by spending her tax refund on the girl instead of buying a game he said she had promised him.

O’Brien said Jordan wants to please adults and wants his father’s full attention. He said this dynamic makes it unlikely that Jordan would ever admit to the killings because in doing so, he would risk the rejection of his father and others who support him.

He said that taken together, this tendency to “deny, minimize and shift blame,” and harbor resentment as well as the lack of incentive he has to admit guilt make his amenability to rehabilitation “very limited.”

Under cross-examination by Defense Atty. David Acker, O’Brien said personality traits could remain the same into adulthood but could also change.

The prosecution also called Pennsylvania State Trooper Jeffrey Marti who said that lab tests showed that a “pristine” shell casing found in the driveway at the Brown residence along the path where Jordan walked to the school bus “was fired from Jordan’s gun.” The weapon was a 20-gauge shotgun which the boy had in the house.

After the hearing, Anthony Krastek of the Pennsylvania attorney general’s office said allegations by Jordan’s supporters are not true that police did not investigate a former boyfriend who had made death threats against Houk. He said investigators eliminated the ex-boyfriend as a suspect because when they went to his house, he was just getting into his vehicle and there were no tracks in the fresh snow around the home, indicating he had not left the house that morning.

Krastek said an investigation found no tire tracks consistent with a pick-up truck Jordan reported seeing near the home and that the only tracks in the snow were those that Jordan and Houk’s daughter made when they walked down the driveway to catch the school bus.


Comments

1L0L(489 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

cage this animal

Suggest removal:

2northsideperson(327 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Sounds like the kid's a compulsive liar - thoroughly believes the lies, lies when the truth makes sense.

Suggest removal:

3Stan(9923 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

A shotgun would make a lot of noise and it states that Jordan and Houk’s daughter left for school . Shouldn't this girl be hysterical knowing her mother had been shot ? Very unusual case .

Suggest removal:

4FifthAve(120 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

The killing of a pregnant woman is a double tragedy. Now this psychiatrist is creating yet another tragedy. Giving up on a 12 year old child is just unacceptable. We can do better. Trying children as an adult ought to be against the law.

Suggest removal:

5Hillary(41 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

This Dr. O'Brien is a "forensic psychiatrist/lawyer" and clearly was there to promote the DA's desire to keep the case in adult court. Krasek is looking to get a name off this case. What child does not do the things this doctor describes as abnormal? My children count Christmas gifts. I know a lot of children that count gifts and keep track of who got what. I also know that as children get older they tend to realize that they are being duped by their parents who promise things that never come and they call them out. This is normal stuff that children do at this age. I thought the doctor was there to evaluate the child but instead he laid out a theory of guilt and said Jordan is not amendable because he did not confess. Why should he confess if he is innocent? Is this not why we have trials? I am a little surprised that this doctor would put his name on the line in such an unethical manner, unlike the defense expert who gave educational and scientific facts about the differences between children and adults. To state that Jordan would not be amendable within the juvenile system unless he confessed is tantamount to the abuse of authority that they are portraying in PA.

Suggest removal:

6Lifes2Short(2722 comments)posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Should be in juvenile and then reassessed when he turns 21.

Suggest removal:

7IAmJustSayin(1 comment)posted 1 year, 10 months ago

Everybody hates lawyers. Fine, but lawyers are advocates in an adversarial system. The system needs them. We are always angered by defense attorneys who defend people they should realize are guilty but give prosecutors a pass when they zealously prosecute the innocent because we believe they are good guys fighting for us. Find a psychiatrist "expert" who comes down on either side of the issue from one case to the next or all you have found is a whore. If Mary G. wants to do some investigative reporting, she should look into the "experts" past performances. We know that lawyers are advocates so we take what they say with a grain of salt. Whores sell their opinions while trying to pass themselves off as disinterested experts. The system doesn't need them to be whores. They volunteer that part. And we blame lawyers.

Suggest removal:


News
Opinion
Entertainment
Sports
Marketplace
Classifieds
Records
Discussions
Community
Help
Forms
Neighbors

HomeTerms of UsePrivacy StatementAdvertiseStaff DirectoryHelp
© 2012 Vindy.com. All rights reserved. A service of The Vindicator.
107 Vindicator Square. Youngstown, OH 44503

Phone Main: 330.747.1471 • Interactive Advertising: 330.740.2955 • Classified Advertising: 330.746.6565
Sponsored Links: